Retreatment With Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Pleural Mesothelioma Following Disease Progression After a Durable Response: Case Series

IF 3.5 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Illaa Smesseim MD , Paul Baas MD, PhD , Jacobus A. Burgers MD, PhD
{"title":"Retreatment With Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Pleural Mesothelioma Following Disease Progression After a Durable Response: Case Series","authors":"Illaa Smesseim MD ,&nbsp;Paul Baas MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Jacobus A. Burgers MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The CheckMate 743 trial established nivolumab and ipilimumab as the standard first-line treatment for unresectable pleural mesothelioma. However, optimal management following disease progression after a durable response to dual immunotherapy remains unclear. We report two cases of patients with pleural mesothelioma (epithelioid subtype) initially treated with nivolumab-ipilimumab, achieving prolonged disease control. Both patients experienced disease progression several years after treatment discontinuation and were subsequently retreated with nivolumab-ipilimumab on regulatory approval. In both cases, retreatment resulted in stable disease for at least 12 months. However, immune-related toxicities occurred, with one patient developing recurrent colitis and the other experiencing nephrotic syndrome, ultimately leading to treatment discontinuation. These cases suggest that retreatment with dual immunotherapy may be a viable strategy for selected patients with previous durable responses, although the risk of immune-related toxicity remains significant. Given the lack of prospective data, further research is needed to determine whether rechallenge with nivolumab-ipilimumab offers superior outcomes compared with chemotherapy or best supportive care in this setting. Rechallenging patients with pleural mesothelioma with nivolumab-ipilimumab after a durable response is feasible but associated with immune-related toxicity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17675,"journal":{"name":"JTO Clinical and Research Reports","volume":"6 7","pages":"Article 100835"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTO Clinical and Research Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666364325000517","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The CheckMate 743 trial established nivolumab and ipilimumab as the standard first-line treatment for unresectable pleural mesothelioma. However, optimal management following disease progression after a durable response to dual immunotherapy remains unclear. We report two cases of patients with pleural mesothelioma (epithelioid subtype) initially treated with nivolumab-ipilimumab, achieving prolonged disease control. Both patients experienced disease progression several years after treatment discontinuation and were subsequently retreated with nivolumab-ipilimumab on regulatory approval. In both cases, retreatment resulted in stable disease for at least 12 months. However, immune-related toxicities occurred, with one patient developing recurrent colitis and the other experiencing nephrotic syndrome, ultimately leading to treatment discontinuation. These cases suggest that retreatment with dual immunotherapy may be a viable strategy for selected patients with previous durable responses, although the risk of immune-related toxicity remains significant. Given the lack of prospective data, further research is needed to determine whether rechallenge with nivolumab-ipilimumab offers superior outcomes compared with chemotherapy or best supportive care in this setting. Rechallenging patients with pleural mesothelioma with nivolumab-ipilimumab after a durable response is feasible but associated with immune-related toxicity.
Nivolumab和Ipilimumab治疗胸膜间皮瘤在持续缓解后疾病进展:病例系列
CheckMate 743试验建立了nivolumab和ipilimumab作为不可切除胸膜间皮瘤的标准一线治疗方法。然而,在对双重免疫治疗产生持久反应后,疾病进展后的最佳管理仍不清楚。我们报告了两例胸膜间皮瘤(上皮样亚型)患者最初使用尼伏单抗-伊匹单抗治疗,实现了长期的疾病控制。两名患者在停药几年后均出现疾病进展,随后经监管部门批准使用尼伏单抗-伊匹单抗进行治疗。在这两个病例中,再治疗导致疾病稳定至少12个月。然而,发生了免疫相关的毒性,一名患者出现复发性结肠炎,另一名患者出现肾病综合征,最终导致治疗中断。这些病例表明,尽管免疫相关毒性的风险仍然很大,但对于先前有持久反应的选定患者,双重免疫治疗可能是一种可行的策略。鉴于缺乏前瞻性数据,需要进一步的研究来确定在这种情况下,与化疗或最佳支持治疗相比,nivolumab-ipilimumab的再挑战是否能提供更好的结果。对胸膜间皮瘤患者在持久反应后再用纳武单抗-伊匹单抗治疗是可行的,但与免疫相关的毒性有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
145
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信