José Luis P. Calle , Tomasz Dymerski , Marta Ferreiro-González , Miguel Palma
{"title":"Smart portable electronic nose system in combination with machine learning algorithms for the intelligent discrimination of fire debris","authors":"José Luis P. Calle , Tomasz Dymerski , Marta Ferreiro-González , Miguel Palma","doi":"10.1016/j.chemolab.2025.105459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The identification and discrimination of ignitable liquid residues (ILRs) in fire debris are crucial in forensic research for determining the intentionality of a fire. This study presents a new method using a portable sensor-based electronic nose (eNose) combined with machine learning (ML) algorithms for automated ILR classification. Six substrates (vinyl, nylon, linoleum, polyester, wood, and cotton) were burned with different ignitable liquids (gasoline, diesel, ethanol, and charcoal starter with kerosene), and samples were collected at intervals from 0 to 48 h after the fire had extinguished. Sensor responses from multiple sensors (SO<sub>2</sub>, H<sub>2</sub>S, CO, IRR, NO<sub>2</sub>, TBM, NH<sub>3</sub>, and ethanol) were collected over a duration of 140 s. The data were preprocessed using the first derivative and Savitsky-Golay filter, followed by low-level data fusion. A variable selection using the Boruta algorithm was applied, and both reduced and non-reduced matrices were used to train ML models. For detecting the presence of ILRs, random forest (RF) and support vector machine (SVM) models achieved 100 % accuracy. For discriminating between ILR types, the best performance was achieved by the RF model using the reduced matrix, correctly classifying 94.44 % of the samples. Only four sensors (SO<sub>2</sub>, H<sub>2</sub>S, CO, IRR) were necessary, indicating the potential for an optimized eNose design. This method offers advantages over traditional techniques, such as faster analysis, lower cost, and greater portability. Additionally, a web application was developed to allow users to automatically characterize fire debris using the algorithms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9774,"journal":{"name":"Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems","volume":"264 ","pages":"Article 105459"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169743925001443","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The identification and discrimination of ignitable liquid residues (ILRs) in fire debris are crucial in forensic research for determining the intentionality of a fire. This study presents a new method using a portable sensor-based electronic nose (eNose) combined with machine learning (ML) algorithms for automated ILR classification. Six substrates (vinyl, nylon, linoleum, polyester, wood, and cotton) were burned with different ignitable liquids (gasoline, diesel, ethanol, and charcoal starter with kerosene), and samples were collected at intervals from 0 to 48 h after the fire had extinguished. Sensor responses from multiple sensors (SO2, H2S, CO, IRR, NO2, TBM, NH3, and ethanol) were collected over a duration of 140 s. The data were preprocessed using the first derivative and Savitsky-Golay filter, followed by low-level data fusion. A variable selection using the Boruta algorithm was applied, and both reduced and non-reduced matrices were used to train ML models. For detecting the presence of ILRs, random forest (RF) and support vector machine (SVM) models achieved 100 % accuracy. For discriminating between ILR types, the best performance was achieved by the RF model using the reduced matrix, correctly classifying 94.44 % of the samples. Only four sensors (SO2, H2S, CO, IRR) were necessary, indicating the potential for an optimized eNose design. This method offers advantages over traditional techniques, such as faster analysis, lower cost, and greater portability. Additionally, a web application was developed to allow users to automatically characterize fire debris using the algorithms.
期刊介绍:
Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems publishes original research papers, short communications, reviews, tutorials and Original Software Publications reporting on development of novel statistical, mathematical, or computer techniques in Chemistry and related disciplines.
Chemometrics is the chemical discipline that uses mathematical and statistical methods to design or select optimal procedures and experiments, and to provide maximum chemical information by analysing chemical data.
The journal deals with the following topics:
1) Development of new statistical, mathematical and chemometrical methods for Chemistry and related fields (Environmental Chemistry, Biochemistry, Toxicology, System Biology, -Omics, etc.)
2) Novel applications of chemometrics to all branches of Chemistry and related fields (typical domains of interest are: process data analysis, experimental design, data mining, signal processing, supervised modelling, decision making, robust statistics, mixture analysis, multivariate calibration etc.) Routine applications of established chemometrical techniques will not be considered.
3) Development of new software that provides novel tools or truly advances the use of chemometrical methods.
4) Well characterized data sets to test performance for the new methods and software.
The journal complies with International Committee of Medical Journal Editors'' Uniform requirements for manuscripts.