Examining the dimensions of inhibition and its relations to early academic skills and externalizing behaviors in a preschool-age sample

IF 3.2 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Eric D. Hand , Christopher J. Lonigan
{"title":"Examining the dimensions of inhibition and its relations to early academic skills and externalizing behaviors in a preschool-age sample","authors":"Eric D. Hand ,&nbsp;Christopher J. Lonigan","doi":"10.1016/j.ecresq.2025.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Inhibitory processes have been consistently linked to children’s academic and behavioral outcomes. Researchers have argued that response inhibition (i.e., the ability to suppress a prepotent response) and interference suppression (i.e., the ability to ignore task-irrelevant information) represent two distinct constructs in preschool-age children and may be differentially related to children’s academic and behavioral outcomes. However, due to issues with study design, the structure of inhibitory processes and their specific relations to academic and behavioral outcomes remains unclear. The goals of this study were to determine the structure of inhibitory processes with preschool-age children using tasks counterbalanced by measurement method (i.e., computerized vs. non-computerized) and to examine their relations to children’s early academic and behavioral outcomes. In this study, 167 preschool-age children were assessed on measures of response inhibition, interference suppression, and early academic skills (i.e., phonological awareness and early math). Teachers of participating children completed a measure of externalizing behaviors (i.e., the CTRS-15). Contrary to the reported results of other studies of preschool-age children, a two-factor model consisting of separate response inhibition and interference suppression factors did not provide a better fit than a one-factor model of inhibition. Results indicated that the unitary Inhibition factor was similarly related to phonological awareness and early math skills. The unitary Inhibition factor was significantly associated with ADHD-related behaviors but not oppositional-defiant behaviors. Implications of findings and future directions are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48348,"journal":{"name":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","volume":"73 ","pages":"Pages 39-48"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885200625000468","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inhibitory processes have been consistently linked to children’s academic and behavioral outcomes. Researchers have argued that response inhibition (i.e., the ability to suppress a prepotent response) and interference suppression (i.e., the ability to ignore task-irrelevant information) represent two distinct constructs in preschool-age children and may be differentially related to children’s academic and behavioral outcomes. However, due to issues with study design, the structure of inhibitory processes and their specific relations to academic and behavioral outcomes remains unclear. The goals of this study were to determine the structure of inhibitory processes with preschool-age children using tasks counterbalanced by measurement method (i.e., computerized vs. non-computerized) and to examine their relations to children’s early academic and behavioral outcomes. In this study, 167 preschool-age children were assessed on measures of response inhibition, interference suppression, and early academic skills (i.e., phonological awareness and early math). Teachers of participating children completed a measure of externalizing behaviors (i.e., the CTRS-15). Contrary to the reported results of other studies of preschool-age children, a two-factor model consisting of separate response inhibition and interference suppression factors did not provide a better fit than a one-factor model of inhibition. Results indicated that the unitary Inhibition factor was similarly related to phonological awareness and early math skills. The unitary Inhibition factor was significantly associated with ADHD-related behaviors but not oppositional-defiant behaviors. Implications of findings and future directions are discussed.
研究抑制的维度及其与学龄前儿童早期学术技能和外化行为的关系
抑制过程一直与儿童的学业和行为结果有关。研究人员认为,反应抑制(即抑制阳性反应的能力)和干扰抑制(即忽略与任务无关的信息的能力)在学龄前儿童中代表了两种截然不同的构念,并且可能与儿童的学业和行为结果有不同的关系。然而,由于研究设计的问题,抑制过程的结构及其与学术和行为结果的具体关系尚不清楚。本研究的目的是通过测量方法(即计算机化与非计算机化)来确定学龄前儿童抑制过程的结构,并研究它们与儿童早期学业和行为结果的关系。本研究对167名学龄前儿童进行了反应抑制、干扰抑制和早期学术技能(即语音意识和早期数学)的评估。参与儿童的教师完成了一项外化行为测量(即CTRS-15)。与其他学龄前儿童研究报告的结果相反,由单独的反应抑制因子和干扰抑制因子组成的双因素模型并不比单因素抑制模型提供更好的拟合。结果表明,单一抑制因子与语音意识和早期数学技能有相似的关系。单一抑制因子与adhd相关行为显著相关,而与对立违抗行为无关。讨论了研究结果的意义和未来的发展方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
8.10%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: For over twenty years, Early Childhood Research Quarterly (ECRQ) has influenced the field of early childhood education and development through the publication of empirical research that meets the highest standards of scholarly and practical significance. ECRQ publishes predominantly empirical research (quantitative or qualitative methods) on issues of interest to early childhood development, theory, and educational practice (Birth through 8 years of age). The journal also occasionally publishes practitioner and/or policy perspectives, book reviews, and significant reviews of research. As an applied journal, we are interested in work that has social, policy, and educational relevance and implications and work that strengthens links between research and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信