{"title":"Breaking trust? International partnership exit and learning about opportunities","authors":"Joanne Wright , Antje Fiedler , Benjamin P. Fath","doi":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates how exiting key international partnerships affects trust and subsequent learning about opportunities in international markets. We identify three distinct exit approaches using qualitative data from small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The first approach focuses on contractual exit provisions, which destroy affective trust but maintain cognitive trust as a basis for ongoing learning about opportunities in foreign markets. In the second approach, SMEs exit partnerships by claiming control, thus eroding affective and cognitive trust, turning former partners into adversaries and limiting the ability to learn from new relationships. The third approach, a consensual exit, maintains affective trust, offering future opportunities for market learning. This study advances the understanding of the role of trust in SME internationalisation by identifying the effects of exit approaches on post-exit opportunities through the preservation of residual trust. Crucially, the study reveals that learning about opportunities in foreign markets can endure beyond partnership exit.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51352,"journal":{"name":"International Business Review","volume":"34 4","pages":"Article 102451"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969593125000642","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study investigates how exiting key international partnerships affects trust and subsequent learning about opportunities in international markets. We identify three distinct exit approaches using qualitative data from small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The first approach focuses on contractual exit provisions, which destroy affective trust but maintain cognitive trust as a basis for ongoing learning about opportunities in foreign markets. In the second approach, SMEs exit partnerships by claiming control, thus eroding affective and cognitive trust, turning former partners into adversaries and limiting the ability to learn from new relationships. The third approach, a consensual exit, maintains affective trust, offering future opportunities for market learning. This study advances the understanding of the role of trust in SME internationalisation by identifying the effects of exit approaches on post-exit opportunities through the preservation of residual trust. Crucially, the study reveals that learning about opportunities in foreign markets can endure beyond partnership exit.
期刊介绍:
The International Business Review (IBR) stands as a premier international journal within the realm of international business and proudly serves as the official publication of the European International Business Academy (EIBA). This esteemed journal publishes original and insightful papers addressing the theory and practice of international business, encompassing a broad spectrum of topics such as firms' internationalization strategies, cross-border management of operations, and comparative studies of business environments across different countries. In essence, IBR is dedicated to disseminating research that informs the international operations of firms, whether they are SMEs or large MNEs, and guides the actions of policymakers in both home and host countries. The journal warmly welcomes conceptual papers, empirical studies, and review articles, fostering contributions from various disciplines including strategy, finance, management, marketing, economics, HRM, and organizational studies. IBR embraces methodological diversity, with equal openness to papers utilizing quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-method approaches.