Junxiong Ma, Shuhong Bi, Runming Du, Wangteng Jiao, Zhisheng Liang, Qinfeng Zhou, Shuduo Zhou, Yuhang Pan, Wen Tang, Haibin Zhang, Zhijie Zheng, Ming Xu, Tao Wang, Gordon G Liu, Zhenyu Zhang
{"title":"Toward a greener healthcare: unveiling the carbon costs of dialysis in China and the path to sustainability.","authors":"Junxiong Ma, Shuhong Bi, Runming Du, Wangteng Jiao, Zhisheng Liang, Qinfeng Zhou, Shuduo Zhou, Yuhang Pan, Wen Tang, Haibin Zhang, Zhijie Zheng, Ming Xu, Tao Wang, Gordon G Liu, Zhenyu Zhang","doi":"10.1093/intqhc/mzaf050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The healthcare sector plays a significant role in greenhouse gas emissions, hospitals contributed about 5.2% of the global carbon footprint, totaling 10.8 billion tons. It highlights China's healthcare emissions and the potential benefits of energy-efficient technologies in medical settings, including different dialysis treatments. The healthcare sector, a major emissions source, could reduce its impact through sustainable practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cross-sectional study evaluated the annual carbon footprint of patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD). We analyzed demographic characteristics and carbon consumption across both groups, distinguishing the environmental impacts of HD and PD. Linear regression models were used to identify factors influencing carbon emissions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 271 dialysis patients, comprising 143 HD and 128 PD cases. The annual carbon footprints of HD and PD were 3063.1 kg CO2-eq and 436.4 kg CO2-eq, respectively. For HD, the largest contributors to carbon emissions were equipment power consumption (43%) and medical consumables (23%), while for PD, discharge medication (49%) and medical supplies (48%) dominated. The carbon footprint of HD remained stable at 2500-3500 kg CO2-eq per year, while PD ranged from 200-800 kg CO2-eq per year, with no significant changes over extended dialysis periods. Factors such as age, occupation, and geographical location showed varying effects on the carbon footprints of HD and PD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study offers a framework for quantifying ecological benefits from optimized clinical pathways. The findings suggest that promoting peritoneal dialysis could significantly reduce the healthcare sector's carbon footprint, advancing efforts toward sustainability and environmentally responsible healthcare delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":520651,"journal":{"name":"International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzaf050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The healthcare sector plays a significant role in greenhouse gas emissions, hospitals contributed about 5.2% of the global carbon footprint, totaling 10.8 billion tons. It highlights China's healthcare emissions and the potential benefits of energy-efficient technologies in medical settings, including different dialysis treatments. The healthcare sector, a major emissions source, could reduce its impact through sustainable practices.
Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study evaluated the annual carbon footprint of patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD). We analyzed demographic characteristics and carbon consumption across both groups, distinguishing the environmental impacts of HD and PD. Linear regression models were used to identify factors influencing carbon emissions.
Results: The study included 271 dialysis patients, comprising 143 HD and 128 PD cases. The annual carbon footprints of HD and PD were 3063.1 kg CO2-eq and 436.4 kg CO2-eq, respectively. For HD, the largest contributors to carbon emissions were equipment power consumption (43%) and medical consumables (23%), while for PD, discharge medication (49%) and medical supplies (48%) dominated. The carbon footprint of HD remained stable at 2500-3500 kg CO2-eq per year, while PD ranged from 200-800 kg CO2-eq per year, with no significant changes over extended dialysis periods. Factors such as age, occupation, and geographical location showed varying effects on the carbon footprints of HD and PD.
Conclusions: This study offers a framework for quantifying ecological benefits from optimized clinical pathways. The findings suggest that promoting peritoneal dialysis could significantly reduce the healthcare sector's carbon footprint, advancing efforts toward sustainability and environmentally responsible healthcare delivery.
背景:医疗保健行业在温室气体排放中发挥着重要作用,医院贡献了全球约5.2%的碳足迹,总计108亿吨。报告强调了中国医疗行业的碳排放,以及医疗环境中节能技术(包括不同的透析治疗)的潜在好处。医疗保健部门是一个主要的排放源,可通过可持续做法减少其影响。方法:本回顾性横断面研究评估了血液透析(HD)和腹膜透析(PD)患者的年碳足迹。我们分析了两组的人口统计学特征和碳消耗,区分了HD和PD的环境影响。采用线性回归模型识别影响碳排放的因素。结果:共纳入271例透析患者,其中HD 143例,PD 128例。HD和PD的年碳足迹分别为3063.1 kg CO2-eq和436.4 kg CO2-eq。对于HD来说,碳排放的最大贡献者是设备功耗(43%)和医疗耗材(23%),而对于PD来说,出院药物(49%)和医疗用品(48%)占主导地位。HD患者的碳足迹稳定在每年2500-3500千克二氧化碳当量,而PD患者的碳足迹在每年200-800千克二氧化碳当量之间,随着透析时间的延长,碳足迹没有显著变化。年龄、职业、地理位置等因素对HD和PD的碳足迹影响不同。结论:本研究为量化优化临床途径的生态效益提供了一个框架。研究结果表明,推广腹膜透析可以显著减少医疗保健部门的碳足迹,促进可持续发展和对环境负责的医疗保健服务。