Inclusion of patient-centered, non-microbiological endpoints and biomarkers in tuberculosis drug trials.

Frontiers in antibiotics Pub Date : 2025-05-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frabi.2025.1570989
Andrew R DiNardo, Wilbert Sabiiti, Stephen H Gillespie, Sophia B Georghiou, Norbert Heinrich, Norbert Hittel, Sami Taghlabi, Danna Carrero Longlax, Mikashmi Kohli, Ursula Panzner, Collins Musia, Christoph Lange, Anca Vasiliu, Rob J W Arts, Anna M Mandalakas, Morten Ruhwald, Lieven J Stuyver, Reinout van Crevel
{"title":"Inclusion of patient-centered, non-microbiological endpoints and biomarkers in tuberculosis drug trials.","authors":"Andrew R DiNardo, Wilbert Sabiiti, Stephen H Gillespie, Sophia B Georghiou, Norbert Heinrich, Norbert Hittel, Sami Taghlabi, Danna Carrero Longlax, Mikashmi Kohli, Ursula Panzner, Collins Musia, Christoph Lange, Anca Vasiliu, Rob J W Arts, Anna M Mandalakas, Morten Ruhwald, Lieven J Stuyver, Reinout van Crevel","doi":"10.3389/frabi.2025.1570989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tuberculosis drug trials are primarily designed to identify antibiotic regimens with the strongest potency to kill <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i>. However, microbiologic cure is not synonymous with improved health and recovery. Beyond antimicrobial efficacy, parameters such as morbidity and mortality related to lung function, cardiovascular health, and cancer should be prioritized. This narrative review emphasizes the critical need to emphasize clinical outcomes as much, if not more, than microbiological endpoints. We examine the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and determinants of non-microbiological outcomes in tuberculosis, providing a synthesis of current knowledge. While there is growing evidence for some biomarkers to risk stratify TB patients for risk of all-cause mortality, relapse, or lung damage, no evidence was found on TB-associated cancer or cardiovascular disease. In addition to monitoring microbiologic outcomes, clinical trials and treatment cohorts need to capture patient-centered health dimensions more broadly. Finally, we highlight key research gaps and opportunities to evaluate non-microbiological biomarkers, aiming to improve patient monitoring and enable stratified approaches to tuberculosis management.</p>","PeriodicalId":73065,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in antibiotics","volume":"4 ","pages":"1570989"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12140437/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in antibiotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frabi.2025.1570989","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tuberculosis drug trials are primarily designed to identify antibiotic regimens with the strongest potency to kill Mycobacterium tuberculosis. However, microbiologic cure is not synonymous with improved health and recovery. Beyond antimicrobial efficacy, parameters such as morbidity and mortality related to lung function, cardiovascular health, and cancer should be prioritized. This narrative review emphasizes the critical need to emphasize clinical outcomes as much, if not more, than microbiological endpoints. We examine the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and determinants of non-microbiological outcomes in tuberculosis, providing a synthesis of current knowledge. While there is growing evidence for some biomarkers to risk stratify TB patients for risk of all-cause mortality, relapse, or lung damage, no evidence was found on TB-associated cancer or cardiovascular disease. In addition to monitoring microbiologic outcomes, clinical trials and treatment cohorts need to capture patient-centered health dimensions more broadly. Finally, we highlight key research gaps and opportunities to evaluate non-microbiological biomarkers, aiming to improve patient monitoring and enable stratified approaches to tuberculosis management.

在结核病药物试验中纳入以患者为中心的非微生物终点和生物标志物。
结核病药物试验的主要目的是确定具有最强杀伤结核分枝杆菌效力的抗生素方案。然而,微生物疗法并不是改善健康和康复的同义词。除抗菌效果外,应优先考虑与肺功能、心血管健康和癌症相关的发病率和死亡率等参数。这篇叙述性综述强调了强调临床结果的迫切需要,即使不是更多,也要比微生物终点强调得更多。我们研究了结核病的潜在病理生理机制和非微生物预后的决定因素,提供了当前知识的综合。虽然越来越多的证据表明,一些生物标志物可以根据全因死亡、复发或肺损伤的风险对结核病患者进行风险分层,但没有发现与结核病相关的癌症或心血管疾病相关的证据。除了监测微生物结果外,临床试验和治疗队列还需要更广泛地捕捉以患者为中心的健康维度。最后,我们强调了评估非微生物生物标志物的关键研究差距和机会,旨在改善患者监测并实现分层结核病管理方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信