Where Can Artificial Intelligence Assist Cancer Care?: Examining Patient-Centered Communication Dimension Effects.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Qiwei Luna Wu, Yue Liao, Grace Ellen Brannon
{"title":"Where Can Artificial Intelligence Assist Cancer Care?: Examining Patient-Centered Communication Dimension Effects.","authors":"Qiwei Luna Wu, Yue Liao, Grace Ellen Brannon","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore how aspects of patient-centered communication (PCC) may directly or indirectly predict patients' preferences for artificial intelligences (AIs) versus human medical professionals, based on the stimulus-organism-response model.</p><p><strong>Study setting and design: </strong>As AI gains popularity and researchers explore its application in the medical context, it is important to understand how current patient-provider dynamics involving high technology (e.g., telehealth communication) may shape patients' perceptions of future use of AI, especially in the context of cancer care where patient satisfaction and sense of care continuity are important. Participants were recruited from an online panel in China (June 2024). Structural equation modeling analyzed the relationships among variables, including six PCC dimensions (i.e., exchanging information, fostering healing relationships, making decisions, managing uncertainty, responding to emotions, and enabling patient self-management), communication outcomes (i.e., patient satisfaction, sense of care continuity), and patients' preference of AIs vs. human medical professionals.</p><p><strong>Data sources and analytic sample: </strong>Primary data were collected from an online panel of 495 Chinese cancer patients in China, representative of the gender and age distribution of the overall Chinese population due to quota sampling.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>Direct predictors of preference for replacing human medical professionals with AIs included lower patient satisfaction (β = -11, p < 0.05), lower ease of use (β = -0.1, p < 0.05), better care continuity (β = 0.15, p < 0.01), providers' attending to emotions (β = 0.17, p < 0.05), and less enablement in self-management (β = -0.17, p < 0.01). Patient satisfaction, ease of use, and care continuity mediated the relationships between different PCC dimensions and patients' preferences for AI use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PCC and communication outcomes are associated with cancer patients' preferences in future AI use. Our study sheds light on how clinicians may improve their communication to educate patients on navigating the cancer care continuum using AI technology.</p>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":"e14653"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14653","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore how aspects of patient-centered communication (PCC) may directly or indirectly predict patients' preferences for artificial intelligences (AIs) versus human medical professionals, based on the stimulus-organism-response model.

Study setting and design: As AI gains popularity and researchers explore its application in the medical context, it is important to understand how current patient-provider dynamics involving high technology (e.g., telehealth communication) may shape patients' perceptions of future use of AI, especially in the context of cancer care where patient satisfaction and sense of care continuity are important. Participants were recruited from an online panel in China (June 2024). Structural equation modeling analyzed the relationships among variables, including six PCC dimensions (i.e., exchanging information, fostering healing relationships, making decisions, managing uncertainty, responding to emotions, and enabling patient self-management), communication outcomes (i.e., patient satisfaction, sense of care continuity), and patients' preference of AIs vs. human medical professionals.

Data sources and analytic sample: Primary data were collected from an online panel of 495 Chinese cancer patients in China, representative of the gender and age distribution of the overall Chinese population due to quota sampling.

Principal findings: Direct predictors of preference for replacing human medical professionals with AIs included lower patient satisfaction (β = -11, p < 0.05), lower ease of use (β = -0.1, p < 0.05), better care continuity (β = 0.15, p < 0.01), providers' attending to emotions (β = 0.17, p < 0.05), and less enablement in self-management (β = -0.17, p < 0.01). Patient satisfaction, ease of use, and care continuity mediated the relationships between different PCC dimensions and patients' preferences for AI use.

Conclusions: PCC and communication outcomes are associated with cancer patients' preferences in future AI use. Our study sheds light on how clinicians may improve their communication to educate patients on navigating the cancer care continuum using AI technology.

人工智能在哪些方面可以帮助癌症治疗?研究以患者为中心的沟通维度效应。
目的:探讨基于刺激-机体-反应模型的以患者为中心的沟通(PCC)的各个方面如何直接或间接地预测患者对人工智能(ai)与人类医疗专业人员的偏好。研究设置和设计:随着人工智能越来越受欢迎,研究人员探索其在医疗领域的应用,了解当前涉及高科技(例如,远程医疗通信)的患者-提供者动态如何影响患者对未来使用人工智能的看法是很重要的,特别是在癌症护理的背景下,患者满意度和护理连续性感很重要。参与者是从中国的一个在线小组中招募的(2024年6月)。结构方程模型分析了变量之间的关系,包括六个PCC维度(即交换信息、培养治疗关系、做出决策、管理不确定性、应对情绪和实现患者自我管理)、沟通结果(即患者满意度、护理连续性感)以及患者对人工智能与人类医疗专业人员的偏好。数据来源和分析样本:主要数据来自495名中国癌症患者的在线小组,由于配额抽样,代表了中国总体人口的性别和年龄分布。主要发现:用人工智能取代人类医疗专业人员的偏好的直接预测因素包括较低的患者满意度(β = -11, p)。结论:PCC和沟通结果与癌症患者对未来人工智能使用的偏好相关。我们的研究揭示了临床医生如何改善他们的沟通,以教育患者使用人工智能技术进行癌症治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信