Primary Care Physician Characteristics and Low-Value Care Provision in Japan.

IF 9.5 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Atsushi Miyawaki, John N Mafi, Kazuhiro Abe, Alexandra Klomhaus, Rei Goto, Kei Kitajima, Daichi Sato, Yusuke Tsugawa
{"title":"Primary Care Physician Characteristics and Low-Value Care Provision in Japan.","authors":"Atsushi Miyawaki, John N Mafi, Kazuhiro Abe, Alexandra Klomhaus, Rei Goto, Kei Kitajima, Daichi Sato, Yusuke Tsugawa","doi":"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.1430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Evidence is limited regarding the physician characteristics associated with the provision of low-value services in primary care, especially outside of the US.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To measure physician-level use of 10 low-value care services that provide no net clinical benefit and to investigate the characteristics of primary care physicians who frequently provide low-value care in Japan.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cross-sectional analysis used a nationwide electronic health record database linked with claims data in Japan to assess visits by adult patients (age ≥18 years) to a solo-practice primary care physician from October 1, 2022, through September 30, 2023. Data analysis was performed from June 2024 to February 2025.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Multivariable-adjusted composite rate of low-value care services delivered per 100 patients per year, aggregated across 10 low-value measures, after accounting for case mix and other characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 2 542 630 patients (mean [SD] age, 51.6 [19.8] years; 58.2% female) treated by 1019 primary care physicians (mean [SD] age 56.4 [10.2] years; 90.4% male), 436 317 low-value care services were identified (17.2 cases per 100 patients overall). Nearly half of these low-value care services were provided by 10% of physicians. After accounting for patient case mix, older physicians (age ≥60 years) delivered 2.1 per 100 patients (95% CI, 1.0-3.3) more low-value care services than those younger than 40 years; not board-certified physicians delivered 0.8 per 100 patients (95% CI, 0.2-1.5) more than general internal medicine board-certified physicians; physicians with higher patient volumes delivered 2.3 per 100 patients (95% CI, 1.5-3.2) more than those with low patient volumes; and physicians practicing in Western Japan delivered 1.0 per 100 patients (95% CI, 0.5-1.5) more than those in Eastern Japan.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The findings of this cross-sectional analysis suggest that low-value care services were common and concentrated among a small number of primary care physicians in Japan, with older physicians and not board-certified physicians being more likely to provide low-value care. Policy interventions targeting at a small number of certain types of physicians providing large quantities of low-value care may be more effective and efficient than those targeting all physicians uniformly.</p>","PeriodicalId":53180,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Health Forum","volume":"6 6","pages":"e251430"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12144622/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Health Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.1430","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Evidence is limited regarding the physician characteristics associated with the provision of low-value services in primary care, especially outside of the US.

Objective: To measure physician-level use of 10 low-value care services that provide no net clinical benefit and to investigate the characteristics of primary care physicians who frequently provide low-value care in Japan.

Design, setting, and participants: This cross-sectional analysis used a nationwide electronic health record database linked with claims data in Japan to assess visits by adult patients (age ≥18 years) to a solo-practice primary care physician from October 1, 2022, through September 30, 2023. Data analysis was performed from June 2024 to February 2025.

Main outcomes and measures: Multivariable-adjusted composite rate of low-value care services delivered per 100 patients per year, aggregated across 10 low-value measures, after accounting for case mix and other characteristics.

Results: Among 2 542 630 patients (mean [SD] age, 51.6 [19.8] years; 58.2% female) treated by 1019 primary care physicians (mean [SD] age 56.4 [10.2] years; 90.4% male), 436 317 low-value care services were identified (17.2 cases per 100 patients overall). Nearly half of these low-value care services were provided by 10% of physicians. After accounting for patient case mix, older physicians (age ≥60 years) delivered 2.1 per 100 patients (95% CI, 1.0-3.3) more low-value care services than those younger than 40 years; not board-certified physicians delivered 0.8 per 100 patients (95% CI, 0.2-1.5) more than general internal medicine board-certified physicians; physicians with higher patient volumes delivered 2.3 per 100 patients (95% CI, 1.5-3.2) more than those with low patient volumes; and physicians practicing in Western Japan delivered 1.0 per 100 patients (95% CI, 0.5-1.5) more than those in Eastern Japan.

Conclusions and relevance: The findings of this cross-sectional analysis suggest that low-value care services were common and concentrated among a small number of primary care physicians in Japan, with older physicians and not board-certified physicians being more likely to provide low-value care. Policy interventions targeting at a small number of certain types of physicians providing large quantities of low-value care may be more effective and efficient than those targeting all physicians uniformly.

日本初级保健医生的特点和低价值保健的提供。
重要性:关于初级保健中提供低价值服务的医生特征的证据有限,特别是在美国以外。目的:测量医生对10种无净临床效益的低价值护理服务的使用情况,并调查日本经常提供低价值护理的初级保健医生的特征。设计、环境和参与者:本横断面分析使用与日本索赔数据相关的全国电子健康记录数据库来评估成年患者(年龄≥18岁)在2022年10月1日至2023年9月30日期间就诊于单独执业的初级保健医生的情况。数据分析时间为2024年6月至2025年2月。主要结局和衡量指标:每年每100名患者提供的低价值护理服务的多变量调整综合比率,在考虑病例组合和其他特征后,通过10个低价值衡量指标汇总。结果:2 542 630例患者(平均[SD]年龄51.6[19.8]岁;58.2%为女性),接受过1019名初级保健医生的治疗(平均[SD]年龄56.4[10.2]岁;90.4%为男性),436 317个低价值护理服务(每100名患者中有17.2例)。近一半的低价值护理服务是由10%的医生提供的。在考虑了患者病例组合后,年龄≥60岁的老年医生比年龄小于40岁的医生每100名患者提供2.1个低价值护理服务(95% CI, 1.0-3.3);非委员会认证医师每100名患者接生0.8例(95% CI, 0.2-1.5),比普通内科委员会认证医师多;患者数量较多的医生比患者数量较少的医生每100例患者多交付2.3例(95% CI, 1.5-3.2);在日本西部执业的医生每100名患者接生1.0个(95% CI, 0.5-1.5)比在日本东部执业的医生多。结论和相关性:本横断面分析的结果表明,低价值护理服务在日本很常见,集中在少数初级保健医生中,年龄较大的医生和未获得委员会认证的医生更有可能提供低价值护理。针对提供大量低价值护理的少数特定类型医生的政策干预可能比针对所有医生的政策干预更有效和高效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAMA Health Forum is an international, peer-reviewed, online, open access journal that addresses health policy and strategies affecting medicine, health, and health care. The journal publishes original research, evidence-based reports, and opinion about national and global health policy. It covers innovative approaches to health care delivery and health care economics, access, quality, safety, equity, and reform. In addition to publishing articles, JAMA Health Forum also features commentary from health policy leaders on the JAMA Forum. It covers news briefs on major reports released by government agencies, foundations, health policy think tanks, and other policy-focused organizations. JAMA Health Forum is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. The journal presents curated health policy content from across the JAMA Network, including journals such as JAMA and JAMA Internal Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信