Genomic Evaluation in Nellore Cattle for Reproductive Traits: Multiple Ways to Account for Missing Pedigrees.

IF 1.9 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Larissa Temp, Gabriel Gubiani, Ludmilla Brunes, Claudio Magnabosco, Fernando Bussiman, Jorge Hidalgo, Daniela Lourenco, Fernando Baldi
{"title":"Genomic Evaluation in Nellore Cattle for Reproductive Traits: Multiple Ways to Account for Missing Pedigrees.","authors":"Larissa Temp, Gabriel Gubiani, Ludmilla Brunes, Claudio Magnabosco, Fernando Bussiman, Jorge Hidalgo, Daniela Lourenco, Fernando Baldi","doi":"10.1111/jbg.12947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Missing pedigrees are a common problem in most populations. Animals with unknown ancestors are usually treated as founders; however, this can underestimate inbreeding, not properly account for different base populations, and bias breeding values. We aimed to assess the use of unknown parent groups (UPG) or metafounders (MF) to model missing pedigrees in a beef cattle population. Phenotypic and genotypic data from the Nellore improvement programme of the Brazilian Breeders and Researchers Association were used. The pedigree contained 3.8 M animals born between 1970 and 2022, of which 51,752 were genotyped. Records for scrotal circumference at 365 days old (SC365, N = 239,806), age at first calving (AFC, N = 560,785) and accumulated cow productivity (ACP, N = 269,330) were used. Four models were implemented: single-step GBLUP without explicitly dealing with missing pedigree (G0), with UPG (G1), with MF (G2) and with <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>G</mi></mrow> <annotation>$$ \\mathbf{G} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> accounting for group-specific allele frequencies (G3). UPG and MF were assigned based on commercial and registered herds (S1), uncertain paternity (S2) and patriarchs (S3). The accuracy and bias of predictions were assessed using the linear regression (LR) method. Linear, single-trait animal models were used for SC365 and AFC, and multi-trait for ACP. Heritability estimates ranged from 0.07 to 0.40. Compared to G0, accuracy was slightly higher in G2<sub>S2</sub> and G2<sub>S3</sub> (0.70 vs. 0.71) for SC365, G2<sub>S3</sub> (0.49 vs. 0.51) for AFC, G1<sub>S2</sub> for ACP (0.67 vs. 0.71). Bias was small in all the scenarios (≤ 0.06 SD), except of ACP that presented a great bias, including MF. Overall, G1 and G2 had similar accuracy, possibly because of the limited number of genotyped animals linked to MF. Centring the genomic relationship matrix by patriarchs' allelic frequencies resulted in similar accuracy and bias to the MF models. Replicating the study with a larger database containing more genotyped animals connected to MF could help improve the MF estimates, and thus, prediction accuracy and bias.</p>","PeriodicalId":54885,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12947","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Missing pedigrees are a common problem in most populations. Animals with unknown ancestors are usually treated as founders; however, this can underestimate inbreeding, not properly account for different base populations, and bias breeding values. We aimed to assess the use of unknown parent groups (UPG) or metafounders (MF) to model missing pedigrees in a beef cattle population. Phenotypic and genotypic data from the Nellore improvement programme of the Brazilian Breeders and Researchers Association were used. The pedigree contained 3.8 M animals born between 1970 and 2022, of which 51,752 were genotyped. Records for scrotal circumference at 365 days old (SC365, N = 239,806), age at first calving (AFC, N = 560,785) and accumulated cow productivity (ACP, N = 269,330) were used. Four models were implemented: single-step GBLUP without explicitly dealing with missing pedigree (G0), with UPG (G1), with MF (G2) and with G $$ \mathbf{G} $$ accounting for group-specific allele frequencies (G3). UPG and MF were assigned based on commercial and registered herds (S1), uncertain paternity (S2) and patriarchs (S3). The accuracy and bias of predictions were assessed using the linear regression (LR) method. Linear, single-trait animal models were used for SC365 and AFC, and multi-trait for ACP. Heritability estimates ranged from 0.07 to 0.40. Compared to G0, accuracy was slightly higher in G2S2 and G2S3 (0.70 vs. 0.71) for SC365, G2S3 (0.49 vs. 0.51) for AFC, G1S2 for ACP (0.67 vs. 0.71). Bias was small in all the scenarios (≤ 0.06 SD), except of ACP that presented a great bias, including MF. Overall, G1 and G2 had similar accuracy, possibly because of the limited number of genotyped animals linked to MF. Centring the genomic relationship matrix by patriarchs' allelic frequencies resulted in similar accuracy and bias to the MF models. Replicating the study with a larger database containing more genotyped animals connected to MF could help improve the MF estimates, and thus, prediction accuracy and bias.

内洛尔牛生殖性状的基因组评估:解释缺失谱系的多种方法。
在大多数人群中,缺少系谱是一个常见的问题。祖先未知的动物通常被视为创始人;然而,这可能低估了近亲繁殖,没有适当地考虑到不同的基础群体,并偏差育种值。我们的目的是评估使用未知亲本群体(UPG)或元创始人(MF)来模拟肉牛种群中缺失的谱系。表型和基因型数据来自巴西育种和研究人员协会的Nellore改良计划。该谱系包含380万只1970年至2022年间出生的动物,其中51752只进行了基因分型。使用365日龄阴囊周长(SC365, N = 239,806)、初产犊龄(AFC, N = 560,785)和奶牛累积生产力(ACP, N = 269,330)的记录。实现了四种模型:未明确处理缺失谱系的单步GBLUP (G0), UPG (G1), MF (G2)和G $$ \mathbf{G} $$ (G3),用于组特异性等位基因频率。UPG和MF是根据商业和登记的畜群(S1)、不确定的父系(S2)和族长(S3)来分配的。采用线性回归(LR)方法评估预测的准确性和偏差。SC365和AFC采用线性单性状动物模型,ACP采用多性状动物模型。遗传率估计在0.07到0.40之间。与G0相比,SC365的G2S2和G2S3的准确性略高(0.70比0.71),AFC的G2S3(0.49比0.51),ACP的G1S2(0.67比0.71)。除包括MF在内的ACP出现较大偏倚外,所有情景的偏倚均较小(≤0.06 SD)。总体而言,G1和G2具有相似的准确性,可能是因为与MF相关的基因型动物数量有限。以父系等位基因频率为中心的基因组关系矩阵与MF模型具有相似的准确性和偏差。用包含更多与MF相关的基因型动物的更大数据库复制该研究可以帮助提高MF估计,从而提高预测的准确性和偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics
Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.80%
发文量
58
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics publishes original articles by international scientists on genomic selection, and any other topic related to breeding programmes, selection, quantitative genetic, genomics, diversity and evolution of domestic animals. Researchers, teachers, and the animal breeding industry will find the reports of interest. Book reviews appear in many issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信