Optimising the use of certification findings to support healthcare quality measurement and improvement.

IF 1.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jerome Ng, Jacky Chan, Jerson Valencia, Kaushik Kaushik, Fran Voykovich, Marama Tauranga, Andrew Connolly, Vanessa Thornton
{"title":"Optimising the use of certification findings to support healthcare quality measurement and improvement.","authors":"Jerome Ng, Jacky Chan, Jerson Valencia, Kaushik Kaushik, Fran Voykovich, Marama Tauranga, Andrew Connolly, Vanessa Thornton","doi":"10.26635/6965.6939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Certification is one of several regulatory tools intended to support and ensure the safe provision of health and disability services, such as hospitals and rest homes, to the public. Health and disability service providers must be certified and meet all relevant service standards if they are to provide healthcare services. Not surprisingly, service providers, regulators and auditors spend a significant amount of effort and resources to prepare for, undertake, administer and report the audits. Given the substantial investment by all involved, it is essential to optimise the use of the findings to support system learning and quality improvement. However, in reality and practice, the qualitative and narrative nature of the audit findings means that they are unable to be used to optimise their return for the commensurate effort. In this viewpoint article, we propose and describe a complementary quantitative approach to using certification data to enable and support clinical governance and quality improvement in and across organisations. We reflect on our proposed approach in practice and consider its limitations and implications on practice, research and policy.</p>","PeriodicalId":48086,"journal":{"name":"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL","volume":"138 1616","pages":"99-106"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26635/6965.6939","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Certification is one of several regulatory tools intended to support and ensure the safe provision of health and disability services, such as hospitals and rest homes, to the public. Health and disability service providers must be certified and meet all relevant service standards if they are to provide healthcare services. Not surprisingly, service providers, regulators and auditors spend a significant amount of effort and resources to prepare for, undertake, administer and report the audits. Given the substantial investment by all involved, it is essential to optimise the use of the findings to support system learning and quality improvement. However, in reality and practice, the qualitative and narrative nature of the audit findings means that they are unable to be used to optimise their return for the commensurate effort. In this viewpoint article, we propose and describe a complementary quantitative approach to using certification data to enable and support clinical governance and quality improvement in and across organisations. We reflect on our proposed approach in practice and consider its limitations and implications on practice, research and policy.

优化认证结果的使用,以支持医疗保健质量测量和改进。
认证是旨在支持和确保向公众安全提供医疗和残疾服务(如医院和养老院)的若干监管工具之一。保健和残疾服务提供者如果要提供保健服务,就必须获得认证并符合所有相关的服务标准。毫不奇怪,服务提供商、监管机构和审计师花费了大量的精力和资源来准备、进行、管理和报告审计。鉴于所有相关人员的大量投资,优化研究结果以支持系统学习和质量改进是至关重要的。然而,在现实和实践中,审计结果的定性和叙述性质意味着它们无法用于优化相应努力的回报。在这篇观点文章中,我们提出并描述了一种互补的定量方法,使用认证数据来启用和支持组织内和跨组织的临床治理和质量改进。我们在实践中反思我们提出的方法,并考虑其局限性和对实践、研究和政策的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL
NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
23.50%
发文量
229
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信