Functional pelvic tilt frequently differs from the anterior pelvic plane in non-arthritic hip disorders : implications for 3D motion analysis.

IF 2.8 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Mark R J Jenkinson, Calvin Cheung, Alastair G Dick, Johan Witt, Jonathan Hutt
{"title":"Functional pelvic tilt frequently differs from the anterior pelvic plane in non-arthritic hip disorders : implications for 3D motion analysis.","authors":"Mark R J Jenkinson, Calvin Cheung, Alastair G Dick, Johan Witt, Jonathan Hutt","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.66.BJO-2024-0265.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Hip preservation surgeons are increasingly using commercially available 3D motion analysis software to investigate areas of impingement and quantify femoral head coverage. Variations in functional pelvic tilt will affect the position of the acetabular rim and projected femoral head coverage, but currently the majority of available software standardizes sagittal rotation to the anterior pelvic plane (APP). The study hypothesis was that the APP does not correlate well with patient-specific pelvic position.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 60 patients were selected from an institutional database: 20 with acetabular retroversion (AR), 20 with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), and 20 with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Multiplanar CT reformats were created and the sagittal rotation was aligned to the APP. The sagittal pelvic orientation was then corrected until the anteroposterior (AP) projection mirrored that of their preoperative supine and standing plain radiographs. The change in sagittal pelvic tilt angle required was measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean deviation from the APP in the AR group was 11.55° (SD 4.96°) for supine radiographs and 3.28° (SD 8.66°) for standing radiographs. The mean deviation from the APP in the DDH group was 12.2° (SD 4.26°) for supine radiographs and 6.96° (SD 3.43°) for standing radiographs. The main deviation from the APP in the FAI group was 8.63° (SD 5.21°) for supine radiographs and -1.28° (SD 7.31°) for standing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a wide variation in patients' functional pelvic positioning in both supine and standing radiographs, in all different subgroups, which rarely correlates with the APP. Commercial 3D motion analysis may therefore give misleading results for both the extent and location of hip impingement as well as femoral head coverage, which may affect surgical decision-making. Consideration should be given to incorporating this into the software algorithms.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"6 6","pages":"651-657"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12140813/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.66.BJO-2024-0265.R1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Hip preservation surgeons are increasingly using commercially available 3D motion analysis software to investigate areas of impingement and quantify femoral head coverage. Variations in functional pelvic tilt will affect the position of the acetabular rim and projected femoral head coverage, but currently the majority of available software standardizes sagittal rotation to the anterior pelvic plane (APP). The study hypothesis was that the APP does not correlate well with patient-specific pelvic position.

Methods: In total, 60 patients were selected from an institutional database: 20 with acetabular retroversion (AR), 20 with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), and 20 with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Multiplanar CT reformats were created and the sagittal rotation was aligned to the APP. The sagittal pelvic orientation was then corrected until the anteroposterior (AP) projection mirrored that of their preoperative supine and standing plain radiographs. The change in sagittal pelvic tilt angle required was measured.

Results: The mean deviation from the APP in the AR group was 11.55° (SD 4.96°) for supine radiographs and 3.28° (SD 8.66°) for standing radiographs. The mean deviation from the APP in the DDH group was 12.2° (SD 4.26°) for supine radiographs and 6.96° (SD 3.43°) for standing radiographs. The main deviation from the APP in the FAI group was 8.63° (SD 5.21°) for supine radiographs and -1.28° (SD 7.31°) for standing.

Conclusion: There is a wide variation in patients' functional pelvic positioning in both supine and standing radiographs, in all different subgroups, which rarely correlates with the APP. Commercial 3D motion analysis may therefore give misleading results for both the extent and location of hip impingement as well as femoral head coverage, which may affect surgical decision-making. Consideration should be given to incorporating this into the software algorithms.

在非关节炎性髋关节疾病中,功能性骨盆倾斜经常不同于前骨盆平面:对3D运动分析的影响。
目的:髋关节保护外科医生越来越多地使用市售的3D运动分析软件来调查撞击区域并量化股骨头覆盖范围。功能性骨盆倾斜的变化会影响髋臼缘的位置和股骨头的投影覆盖范围,但目前大多数可用的软件都将矢状面旋转标准化到骨盆前平面(APP)。该研究的假设是APP与患者特定的骨盆位置没有很好的相关性。方法:共从机构数据库中选择60例患者:20例髋臼后翻(AR), 20例髋关节发育不良(DDH), 20例凸轮型股髋臼撞击(FAI)。创建多平面CT重新格式化,矢状面旋转与APP对齐。然后纠正骨盆矢状面方向,直到前后位(AP)投影反映术前仰卧位和站立位平片。测量骨盆矢状面所需倾斜角的变化。结果:AR组仰卧位片与APP的平均偏差为11.55°(SD 4.96°),站立位片的平均偏差为3.28°(SD 8.66°)。DDH组仰卧位片与APP的平均偏差为12.2°(SD 4.26°),站立位片与APP的平均偏差为6.96°(SD 3.43°)。FAI组仰卧位片与APP的主要偏差为8.63°(SD 5.21°),站立位片与APP的主要偏差为-1.28°(SD 7.31°)。结论:在所有不同亚组中,患者仰卧位和站立位的功能性骨盆定位存在很大差异,这与APP很少相关。因此,商业化的3D运动分析可能会对髋关节撞击的程度和位置以及股骨头覆盖范围给出误导性的结果,这可能会影响手术决策。应考虑将其纳入软件算法中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Open
Bone & Joint Open ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信