"We were already there where the narrow path …" Benign tracheal stenosis treatment: narrative review on the state of the art and future direction.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Giacomo Cusumano, Daniele Salvatore Paternò, Alberto Terminella, Massimiliano Sorbello, Luigi La Via
{"title":"\"We were already there where the narrow path …\" Benign tracheal stenosis treatment: narrative review on the state of the art and future direction.","authors":"Giacomo Cusumano, Daniele Salvatore Paternò, Alberto Terminella, Massimiliano Sorbello, Luigi La Via","doi":"10.1007/s13304-025-02234-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acquired benign tracheal stenosis represents a challenging condition characterized by narrowing of the tracheal lumen, with post-intubation and post-tracheostomy stenosis accounting for approximately 90% of acquired cases. This comprehensive review examines current treatment strategies, from conservative management to surgical reconstruction, highlighting their indications, limitations, and outcomes based on recent clinical evidence. Conservative management, including humidification, corticosteroid therapy, and treatment of underlying conditions, plays a crucial role in selected cases with mild stenosis. Endoscopic techniques, such as dilation, laser treatment, and airway stenting, offer minimally invasive options with success rates varying from 40 to 80%, depending on patient selection. Surgical approaches, including tracheal resection with primary anastomosis and laryngotracheal reconstruction, remain the gold standard for definitive treatment, with success rates exceeding 90% in specialized centers. The choice of treatment modality depends on various factors, including stenosis length, location, severity, and patient characteristics. Emerging treatments, including tracheal replacement, bioengineered tracheal replacements, three-dimensional printing technology, and cell therapy approaches, show promise in addressing the limitations of traditional techniques, though long-term data remains limited. The integration of various biotechnology approaches has led to the development of hybrid solutions, combining 3D-printed scaffolds with cellular components and growth factors. However, significant challenges remain in the translation of these technologies to clinical practice, including issues of vascularization, immune response, and long-term stability. This review provides an up-to-date analysis of available treatment options and future directions in tracheal stenosis management.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02234-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acquired benign tracheal stenosis represents a challenging condition characterized by narrowing of the tracheal lumen, with post-intubation and post-tracheostomy stenosis accounting for approximately 90% of acquired cases. This comprehensive review examines current treatment strategies, from conservative management to surgical reconstruction, highlighting their indications, limitations, and outcomes based on recent clinical evidence. Conservative management, including humidification, corticosteroid therapy, and treatment of underlying conditions, plays a crucial role in selected cases with mild stenosis. Endoscopic techniques, such as dilation, laser treatment, and airway stenting, offer minimally invasive options with success rates varying from 40 to 80%, depending on patient selection. Surgical approaches, including tracheal resection with primary anastomosis and laryngotracheal reconstruction, remain the gold standard for definitive treatment, with success rates exceeding 90% in specialized centers. The choice of treatment modality depends on various factors, including stenosis length, location, severity, and patient characteristics. Emerging treatments, including tracheal replacement, bioengineered tracheal replacements, three-dimensional printing technology, and cell therapy approaches, show promise in addressing the limitations of traditional techniques, though long-term data remains limited. The integration of various biotechnology approaches has led to the development of hybrid solutions, combining 3D-printed scaffolds with cellular components and growth factors. However, significant challenges remain in the translation of these technologies to clinical practice, including issues of vascularization, immune response, and long-term stability. This review provides an up-to-date analysis of available treatment options and future directions in tracheal stenosis management.

“我们已经在狭窄的道路上了……”良性气管狭窄治疗:对现状和未来方向的叙述性回顾。
获得性气管良性狭窄是一种具有挑战性的疾病,其特征是气管管腔狭窄,气管插管和气管切开术后狭窄约占获得性病例的90%。这篇综合综述检查了目前的治疗策略,从保守治疗到手术重建,强调了它们的适应症、局限性和基于最近临床证据的结果。保守治疗,包括湿化、皮质类固醇治疗和治疗基础疾病,在轻度狭窄的病例中起着至关重要的作用。内镜技术,如扩张、激光治疗和气道支架置入术,提供了微创选择,成功率从40%到80%不等,取决于患者的选择。手术方法,包括气管切除加一期吻合和喉气管重建,仍然是最终治疗的金标准,在专业中心成功率超过90%。治疗方式的选择取决于多种因素,包括狭窄长度、位置、严重程度和患者特征。新兴的治疗方法,包括气管置换术、生物工程气管置换术、三维打印技术和细胞治疗方法,显示出解决传统技术局限性的希望,尽管长期数据仍然有限。各种生物技术方法的整合导致了混合解决方案的发展,将3d打印支架与细胞成分和生长因子相结合。然而,在将这些技术转化为临床实践方面仍然存在重大挑战,包括血管化、免疫反应和长期稳定性问题。这篇综述提供了最新的可用的治疗方案和未来的方向在气管狭窄的管理分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Updates in Surgery
Updates in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
208
期刊介绍: Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future. Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts. Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信