Adding immune checkpoint inhibitors to chemotherapy in elderly cancer patients: Beneficial for many but not all?

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Tumori Pub Date : 2025-06-06 DOI:10.1177/03008916251328539
Fausto Petrelli, Antonio Ghidini, Italo Sarno, Alessandro Iaculli, Angeli Irene, Giovanna Moleri, Mauro Rossitto, Lorenzo Dottorini
{"title":"Adding immune checkpoint inhibitors to chemotherapy in elderly cancer patients: Beneficial for many but not all?","authors":"Fausto Petrelli, Antonio Ghidini, Italo Sarno, Alessandro Iaculli, Angeli Irene, Giovanna Moleri, Mauro Rossitto, Lorenzo Dottorini","doi":"10.1177/03008916251328539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The strategic addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to chemotherapy (CT) offers a potential paradigm shift in the treatment of elderly cancer patients. This systematic review evaluates the impact of ICIs combined with CT on the overall survival (OS) of patients aged 65 and older.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Using the terms \"immune checkpoint inhibitors\" and (PD-1 or PD-L1 or CTLA-4) and (\"cancer\" or \"carcinoma\") and (\"elderly\" or \"older\" or \"65 years\" or \"70 years\"), we searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library through March 2024. We selected only English language, phase II-III randomized controlled trials comparing first-line CT + ICIs vs. CT alone for metastatic cancers, with subgroups reporting outcomes of elderly patients (according to the authors' cutoff of at least 65 years). Hazard ratios (HR) for OS with relative 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were extracted from each study. Summary HR was calculated using random- or fixed-effects models, depending on the heterogeneity of the included studiesResults:The study synthesizes data from 46 phase III randomized controlled trials, focusing on first-line treatments for metastatic cancers, where ICIs plus CT are compared against CT. The meta-analysis reveals that the combination therapy significantly improves OS in certain cancer types like lung cancers (HR=0.79, 95%CI 0.73-0.86; P<0.01), esophageal (HR=0.68, 95%CI 0.6-0.77; P<0.01) and gastric carcinomas (HR=0,8, 95%CI 0.63-0.88; P<0.01). In other cancers, evidence is less strong (e.g, gynecological, breast, genitourinary, head and neck, and skin cancers).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that while the addition of ICIs can enhance survival outcomes in a subset of elderly cancer patients, its efficacy is highly contingent upon the cancer type and the specific patient's health profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":23349,"journal":{"name":"Tumori","volume":" ","pages":"3008916251328539"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tumori","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03008916251328539","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The strategic addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to chemotherapy (CT) offers a potential paradigm shift in the treatment of elderly cancer patients. This systematic review evaluates the impact of ICIs combined with CT on the overall survival (OS) of patients aged 65 and older.

Material and methods: Using the terms "immune checkpoint inhibitors" and (PD-1 or PD-L1 or CTLA-4) and ("cancer" or "carcinoma") and ("elderly" or "older" or "65 years" or "70 years"), we searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library through March 2024. We selected only English language, phase II-III randomized controlled trials comparing first-line CT + ICIs vs. CT alone for metastatic cancers, with subgroups reporting outcomes of elderly patients (according to the authors' cutoff of at least 65 years). Hazard ratios (HR) for OS with relative 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were extracted from each study. Summary HR was calculated using random- or fixed-effects models, depending on the heterogeneity of the included studiesResults:The study synthesizes data from 46 phase III randomized controlled trials, focusing on first-line treatments for metastatic cancers, where ICIs plus CT are compared against CT. The meta-analysis reveals that the combination therapy significantly improves OS in certain cancer types like lung cancers (HR=0.79, 95%CI 0.73-0.86; P<0.01), esophageal (HR=0.68, 95%CI 0.6-0.77; P<0.01) and gastric carcinomas (HR=0,8, 95%CI 0.63-0.88; P<0.01). In other cancers, evidence is less strong (e.g, gynecological, breast, genitourinary, head and neck, and skin cancers).

Conclusions: These findings suggest that while the addition of ICIs can enhance survival outcomes in a subset of elderly cancer patients, its efficacy is highly contingent upon the cancer type and the specific patient's health profile.

在老年癌症患者化疗中加入免疫检查点抑制剂:对许多人有益,但不是全部?
免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)在化疗(CT)中的策略性添加为老年癌症患者的治疗提供了潜在的范式转变。本系统综述评估了ICIs联合CT对65岁及以上患者总生存率(OS)的影响。材料和方法:使用术语“免疫检查点抑制剂”和(PD-1或PD-L1或CTLA-4)和(“癌症”或“癌”)和(“老年”或“老年”或“65岁”或“70岁”),我们检索了PubMed, Embase和Cochrane图书馆至2024年3月。我们只选择了英语语言,II-III期随机对照试验,比较一线CT + ICIs与单独CT治疗转移性癌症,亚组报告老年患者的结果(根据作者至少65岁的截止日期)。从每个研究中提取OS的相对95%可信区间(95% ci)的风险比(HR)。根据纳入研究的异质性,使用随机效应或固定效应模型计算HR。结果:该研究综合了46项III期随机对照试验的数据,重点是转移性癌症的一线治疗,其中将ICIs + CT与CT进行比较。荟萃分析显示,联合治疗可显著改善某些癌症类型的OS,如肺癌(HR=0.79, 95%CI 0.73-0.86;结论:这些发现表明,虽然添加ICIs可以提高一部分老年癌症患者的生存结果,但其疗效在很大程度上取决于癌症类型和特定患者的健康状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tumori
Tumori 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Tumori Journal covers all aspects of cancer science and clinical practice with a strong focus on prevention, translational medicine and clinically relevant reports. We invite the publication of randomized trials and reports on large, consecutive patient series that investigate the real impact of new techniques, drugs and devices inday-to-day clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信