Utility of plasma GFAP as a secondary endpoint for clinical trials in Alzheimer's disease.

IF 4.3 Q2 BUSINESS
Sarah Abbas, Pamela C L Ferreira, Bruna Bellaver, Guilherme Povala, Francieli Rohden, Cristiano Schaffer Aguzzoli, Hussein Zalzale, João Pedro Ferrari-Souza, Douglas T Leffa, Firoza Z Lussier, Carolina Soares, Guilherme Bauer-Negrini, Markley Silva Oliveira-Junior, Matheus Scarpatto Rodrigues, Pampa Saha, Emma Ruppert, Marina Scop Medeiros, Cécile Tissot, Joseph Therriault, Nesrine Rahmouni, Stijn Servaes, Andrea L Benedet, Nicholas J Ashton, Dana L Tudorascu, Serge Gauthier, Helmet Karim, Chang Hyung Hong, Hyun Woong Roh, Eduardo R Zimmer, Thomas K Karikari, Henrik Zetterberg, Kaj Blennow, Anum Saeed, Sang Joon Son, Pedro Rosa-Neto, Tharick Pascoal
{"title":"Utility of plasma GFAP as a secondary endpoint for clinical trials in Alzheimer's disease.","authors":"Sarah Abbas, Pamela C L Ferreira, Bruna Bellaver, Guilherme Povala, Francieli Rohden, Cristiano Schaffer Aguzzoli, Hussein Zalzale, João Pedro Ferrari-Souza, Douglas T Leffa, Firoza Z Lussier, Carolina Soares, Guilherme Bauer-Negrini, Markley Silva Oliveira-Junior, Matheus Scarpatto Rodrigues, Pampa Saha, Emma Ruppert, Marina Scop Medeiros, Cécile Tissot, Joseph Therriault, Nesrine Rahmouni, Stijn Servaes, Andrea L Benedet, Nicholas J Ashton, Dana L Tudorascu, Serge Gauthier, Helmet Karim, Chang Hyung Hong, Hyun Woong Roh, Eduardo R Zimmer, Thomas K Karikari, Henrik Zetterberg, Kaj Blennow, Anum Saeed, Sang Joon Son, Pedro Rosa-Neto, Tharick Pascoal","doi":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical trials have recently incorporated plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) as an exploratory endpoint. To include plasma GFAP as a secondary endpoint, it is essential to characterize its longitudinal progression in target populations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the potential use of plasma GFAP changes as a secondary endpoint in Alzheimer's disease trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We longitudinally evaluated plasma GFAP in individuals with amyloid-beta (Aβ)-PET scans at baseline in three well-characterized cohorts. Cox proportional hazards regression tested the association between changes in plasma GFAP and cognitive function. Analysis of the 95 % confidence interval of annualized change in plasma GFAP provided statistical inference for a significant longitudinal change. Effect size was calculated as the group mean divided by the standard deviation (SD). We estimated the sample size needed to test a 25% drug effect with 80% power on reducing changes in GFAP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We assessed 487 individuals [176 cognitively unimpaired (CU; 29% Aβ positive) and 311 cognitively impaired (CI; 51% Aβ positive)] with some degree of cerebrovascular disease (Fazekas 1-3), over a mean (SD) follow-up of 1.84 (0.46) years. Changes in plasma GFAP were significantly associated with worsening in Clinical Dementia Rating sum of boxes (CDR-SB) score across the population (p < 0.0001). In CU, only Aβ positive individuals showed significant changes in GFAP (p < 0.001). On the other hand, both CI Aβ positive and negative individuals showed longitudinal progression in GFAP levels (p < 0.0001). The effect size of changes in plasma GFAP was higher in CU Aβ positive (0.44), followed by CI Aβ positive (0.42) and CI Aβ negative (0.38). Clinical trials focusing on CU Aβ positive would require 1320 individuals per study arm, while focusing on CI Aβ positive would require 1440 individuals per study arm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Plasma GFAP increased in parallel with cognitive decline, making it a candidate for monitoring disease progression in trials aimed at mitigating cognitive deterioration. Although Aβ positivity significantly accelerated GFAP progression, the fact that GFAP was increased in CI Aβ negative with cerebrovascular disease supports its potential use as a secondary endpoint in this population as well.</p>","PeriodicalId":22711,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"100205"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical trials have recently incorporated plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) as an exploratory endpoint. To include plasma GFAP as a secondary endpoint, it is essential to characterize its longitudinal progression in target populations.

Objective: To evaluate the potential use of plasma GFAP changes as a secondary endpoint in Alzheimer's disease trials.

Methods: We longitudinally evaluated plasma GFAP in individuals with amyloid-beta (Aβ)-PET scans at baseline in three well-characterized cohorts. Cox proportional hazards regression tested the association between changes in plasma GFAP and cognitive function. Analysis of the 95 % confidence interval of annualized change in plasma GFAP provided statistical inference for a significant longitudinal change. Effect size was calculated as the group mean divided by the standard deviation (SD). We estimated the sample size needed to test a 25% drug effect with 80% power on reducing changes in GFAP.

Results: We assessed 487 individuals [176 cognitively unimpaired (CU; 29% Aβ positive) and 311 cognitively impaired (CI; 51% Aβ positive)] with some degree of cerebrovascular disease (Fazekas 1-3), over a mean (SD) follow-up of 1.84 (0.46) years. Changes in plasma GFAP were significantly associated with worsening in Clinical Dementia Rating sum of boxes (CDR-SB) score across the population (p < 0.0001). In CU, only Aβ positive individuals showed significant changes in GFAP (p < 0.001). On the other hand, both CI Aβ positive and negative individuals showed longitudinal progression in GFAP levels (p < 0.0001). The effect size of changes in plasma GFAP was higher in CU Aβ positive (0.44), followed by CI Aβ positive (0.42) and CI Aβ negative (0.38). Clinical trials focusing on CU Aβ positive would require 1320 individuals per study arm, while focusing on CI Aβ positive would require 1440 individuals per study arm.

Conclusion: Plasma GFAP increased in parallel with cognitive decline, making it a candidate for monitoring disease progression in trials aimed at mitigating cognitive deterioration. Although Aβ positivity significantly accelerated GFAP progression, the fact that GFAP was increased in CI Aβ negative with cerebrovascular disease supports its potential use as a secondary endpoint in this population as well.

血浆GFAP作为阿尔茨海默病临床试验的次要终点的效用。
背景:临床试验最近将血浆胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)作为探索性终点。为了将血浆GFAP作为次要终点,有必要确定其在目标人群中的纵向进展。目的:评估血浆GFAP变化作为阿尔茨海默病试验的次要终点的潜在用途。方法:我们在三个特征良好的队列中纵向评估了基线时进行淀粉样蛋白- β (Aβ)-PET扫描的个体血浆GFAP。Cox比例风险回归检验血浆GFAP变化与认知功能之间的关系。血浆GFAP年化变化95%置信区间的分析为显著的纵向变化提供了统计推断。效应量计算为组均值除以标准差(SD)。我们估计测试25%的药物效应和80%的减少GFAP变化的能力所需的样本量。结果:我们评估了487名个体[176名认知未受损(CU;29% Aβ阳性),311例认知障碍(CI;51% a β阳性)]伴有一定程度的脑血管疾病(Fazekas 1-3),平均(SD)随访时间为1.84(0.46)年。血浆GFAP的变化与人群中临床痴呆评分(CDR-SB)评分的恶化显著相关(p < 0.0001)。在CU中,只有Aβ阳性个体GFAP有显著变化(p < 0.001)。另一方面,CI Aβ阳性和阴性个体的GFAP水平均呈纵向进展(p < 0.0001)。血浆GFAP变化效应大小以CU Aβ阳性组高(0.44),其次为CI Aβ阳性组(0.42),CI Aβ阴性组(0.38)。侧重于CU Aβ阳性的临床试验将需要每个研究组1320人,而侧重于CI Aβ阳性的临床试验将需要每个研究组1440人。结论:血浆GFAP与认知能力下降并行增加,使其成为旨在减轻认知能力恶化的试验中监测疾病进展的候选药物。尽管a β阳性显著加速了GFAP的进展,但在脑血管疾病的CI a β阴性患者中,GFAP增加的事实也支持了其作为该人群的次要终点的潜在用途。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The JPAD Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer’Disease will publish reviews, original research articles and short reports to improve our knowledge in the field of Alzheimer prevention including: neurosciences, biomarkers, imaging, epidemiology, public health, physical cognitive exercise, nutrition, risk and protective factors, drug development, trials design, and heath economic outcomes.JPAD will publish also the meeting abstracts from Clinical Trial on Alzheimer Disease (CTAD) and will be distributed both in paper and online version worldwide.We hope that JPAD with your contribution will play a role in the development of Alzheimer prevention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信