Bland-Altman Plot for Censored Variables.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Anne Lotz, Thomas Behrens, Karl-Heinz Jöckel, Dirk Taeger
{"title":"Bland-Altman Plot for Censored Variables.","authors":"Anne Lotz, Thomas Behrens, Karl-Heinz Jöckel, Dirk Taeger","doi":"10.1002/sim.70147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The comparison of two measurement methods turns out to be a statistical challenge if some of the observations are below the limit of quantification or detection. Here we show how the Bland-Altman plot can be modified for censored variables. The reference lines (bias and limits of agreement) in the Bland-Altman plot have to be estimated for censored variables. In a simulation study, we compared three different estimation methods: Restricting the data set to fully quantifiable pairs of observations (complete case analysis), naïvely substituting missing values with half of the limit of quantification, and a multiple imputation procedure based on a maximum likelihood approach for bivariate lognormally distributed variables with censoring. The results show that simple ad-hoc solutions may lead to bias in the results when comparing two measurement methods with censored observations, whereas the presented multiple imputation approach of the Bland-Altman method allows adequate consideration of censored variables. The method works similarly for other distribution assumptions.</p>","PeriodicalId":21879,"journal":{"name":"Statistics in Medicine","volume":"44 13-14","pages":"e70147"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12141777/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.70147","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The comparison of two measurement methods turns out to be a statistical challenge if some of the observations are below the limit of quantification or detection. Here we show how the Bland-Altman plot can be modified for censored variables. The reference lines (bias and limits of agreement) in the Bland-Altman plot have to be estimated for censored variables. In a simulation study, we compared three different estimation methods: Restricting the data set to fully quantifiable pairs of observations (complete case analysis), naïvely substituting missing values with half of the limit of quantification, and a multiple imputation procedure based on a maximum likelihood approach for bivariate lognormally distributed variables with censoring. The results show that simple ad-hoc solutions may lead to bias in the results when comparing two measurement methods with censored observations, whereas the presented multiple imputation approach of the Bland-Altman method allows adequate consideration of censored variables. The method works similarly for other distribution assumptions.

删减变量的Bland-Altman图。
如果某些观测值低于量化或检测的极限,则两种测量方法的比较将是一项统计挑战。在这里,我们展示了如何对删减变量修改Bland-Altman图。Bland-Altman图中的参考线(偏差和一致限度)必须对删减变量进行估计。在一项模拟研究中,我们比较了三种不同的估计方法:将数据集限制为完全可量化的观测对(完整的案例分析),naïvely用量化极限的一半替换缺失值,以及基于最大似然方法对二元对数正态分布变量进行多重输入程序。结果表明,当比较两种测量方法与屏蔽观测值时,简单的特设解可能导致结果偏差,而所提出的Bland-Altman方法的多重imputation方法可以充分考虑屏蔽变量。该方法同样适用于其他分布假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Statistics in Medicine
Statistics in Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
334
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal aims to influence practice in medicine and its associated sciences through the publication of papers on statistical and other quantitative methods. Papers will explain new methods and demonstrate their application, preferably through a substantive, real, motivating example or a comprehensive evaluation based on an illustrative example. Alternatively, papers will report on case-studies where creative use or technical generalizations of established methodology is directed towards a substantive application. Reviews of, and tutorials on, general topics relevant to the application of statistics to medicine will also be published. The main criteria for publication are appropriateness of the statistical methods to a particular medical problem and clarity of exposition. Papers with primarily mathematical content will be excluded. The journal aims to enhance communication between statisticians, clinicians and medical researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信