Association Between Cardiometabolic Index and Blood Pressure: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the NHANES 2015-2018 Data.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine Pub Date : 2025-05-20 eCollection Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.31083/RCM37359
Lingyan He, Ling Sun, Haihua Pan, Changlin Zhai
{"title":"Association Between Cardiometabolic Index and Blood Pressure: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the NHANES 2015-2018 Data.","authors":"Lingyan He, Ling Sun, Haihua Pan, Changlin Zhai","doi":"10.31083/RCM37359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and is closely related to metabolic abnormalities. The cardiometabolic index (CMI) integrates lipid profiles and anthropometric indicators, reflecting overall cardiometabolic health. However, the CMI and blood pressure (BP) relationship is poorly understood. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the correlation between CMI and clinical BP and evaluate the potential of using this correlation as a cardiovascular risk indicator.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data from 2015 to 2018 were used to calculate the CMI based on the triglycerides to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio and the waist-to-height ratio. The relationship between CMI and systolic blood pressure (SBP)/diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was analyzed using multivariate regression, threshold effect analysis, and subgroup analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study cohort of 4240 participants, CMI positively correlated with SBP and DBP. After adjusting for age, gender, and race, the partial correlation for SBP was 0.56 (95% CI: 0.19-0.93; <i>p</i> < 0.01), while for DBP, it was 1.15 (95% CI: 0.60-1.71; <i>p</i> < 0.001). The threshold effect analysis revealed a positive association with SBP when the CMI was below 6.83 (β = 1.44, 95% CI: 0.64-2.24; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and a negative association when the CMI was above 6.83 (β = -1.52, 95% CI: -2.77- -0.28; <i>p</i> = 0.0123). For the DBP, a positive correlation was found when the CMI was below 2.81 (β = 1.45, 95% CI: 0.10-2.79; <i>p</i> = 0.0345), and a negative correlation when the CMI was above 2.81 (β = -1.92, 95% CI: -3.08- -0.77; <i>p</i> = 0.0012). A strong interaction was observed between the CMI and gender for the SBP (<i>p</i> = 0.0054) and a trend for the interaction between CMI and age for the DBP (<i>p</i> = 0.1667).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found a significant positive correlation between the CMI and BP, with threshold effects supporting a non-linear relationship. The strong interaction between the CMI and gender for SBP suggests that the influence of the CMI on BP may be gender-dependent. These results highlight the importance of utilizing CMI in personalized cardiovascular risk stratification and underscore the relevance of considering patient factors such as gender in managing hypertension.</p>","PeriodicalId":20989,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","volume":"26 5","pages":"37359"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12135655/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/RCM37359","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and is closely related to metabolic abnormalities. The cardiometabolic index (CMI) integrates lipid profiles and anthropometric indicators, reflecting overall cardiometabolic health. However, the CMI and blood pressure (BP) relationship is poorly understood. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the correlation between CMI and clinical BP and evaluate the potential of using this correlation as a cardiovascular risk indicator.

Methods: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data from 2015 to 2018 were used to calculate the CMI based on the triglycerides to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio and the waist-to-height ratio. The relationship between CMI and systolic blood pressure (SBP)/diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was analyzed using multivariate regression, threshold effect analysis, and subgroup analysis.

Results: In this study cohort of 4240 participants, CMI positively correlated with SBP and DBP. After adjusting for age, gender, and race, the partial correlation for SBP was 0.56 (95% CI: 0.19-0.93; p < 0.01), while for DBP, it was 1.15 (95% CI: 0.60-1.71; p < 0.001). The threshold effect analysis revealed a positive association with SBP when the CMI was below 6.83 (β = 1.44, 95% CI: 0.64-2.24; p < 0.001) and a negative association when the CMI was above 6.83 (β = -1.52, 95% CI: -2.77- -0.28; p = 0.0123). For the DBP, a positive correlation was found when the CMI was below 2.81 (β = 1.45, 95% CI: 0.10-2.79; p = 0.0345), and a negative correlation when the CMI was above 2.81 (β = -1.92, 95% CI: -3.08- -0.77; p = 0.0012). A strong interaction was observed between the CMI and gender for the SBP (p = 0.0054) and a trend for the interaction between CMI and age for the DBP (p = 0.1667).

Conclusions: This study found a significant positive correlation between the CMI and BP, with threshold effects supporting a non-linear relationship. The strong interaction between the CMI and gender for SBP suggests that the influence of the CMI on BP may be gender-dependent. These results highlight the importance of utilizing CMI in personalized cardiovascular risk stratification and underscore the relevance of considering patient factors such as gender in managing hypertension.

心脏代谢指数与血压之间的关系:NHANES 2015-2018数据的横断面分析
背景:高血压是心血管疾病(cvd)的主要危险因素,与代谢异常密切相关。心脏代谢指数(CMI)综合了脂质谱和人体测量指标,反映了整体的心脏代谢健康。然而,CMI与血压(BP)的关系尚不清楚。因此,本研究旨在探讨CMI与临床血压的相关性,并评估将这种相关性作为心血管危险指标的潜力。方法:采用2015 - 2018年全国健康与营养调查(NHANES)数据,基于甘油三酯与高密度脂蛋白胆固醇比值和腰高比计算CMI。采用多因素回归、阈值效应分析和亚组分析分析CMI与收缩压/舒张压的关系。结果:在4240名参与者的研究队列中,CMI与收缩压和舒张压呈正相关。在调整了年龄、性别和种族后,收缩压的偏相关为0.56 (95% CI: 0.19-0.93;p < 0.01), DBP为1.15 (95% CI: 0.60-1.71;P < 0.001)。阈值效应分析显示,CMI低于6.83时与收缩压呈正相关(β = 1.44, 95% CI: 0.64-2.24;p < 0.001),当CMI大于6.83时呈负相关(β = -1.52, 95% CI: -2.77 ~ -0.28;P = 0.0123)。当CMI < 2.81时,DBP呈正相关(β = 1.45, 95% CI: 0.10-2.79;p = 0.0345),当CMI > 2.81时呈负相关(β = -1.92, 95% CI: -3.08 ~ -0.77;P = 0.0012)。在收缩压方面,CMI和性别之间有很强的相互作用(p = 0.0054),在DBP方面,CMI和年龄之间有相互作用的趋势(p = 0.1667)。结论:本研究发现CMI与BP之间存在显著正相关,阈值效应支持非线性关系。CMI和性别对收缩压的强相互作用表明CMI对BP的影响可能是性别依赖的。这些结果强调了在个性化心血管风险分层中使用CMI的重要性,并强调了在高血压管理中考虑患者因素(如性别)的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
377
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RCM is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal. RCM publishes research articles, review papers and short communications on cardiovascular medicine as well as research on cardiovascular disease. We aim to provide a forum for publishing papers which explore the pathogenesis and promote the progression of cardiac and vascular diseases. We also seek to establish an interdisciplinary platform, focusing on translational issues, to facilitate the advancement of research, clinical treatment and diagnostic procedures. Heart surgery, cardiovascular imaging, risk factors and various clinical cardiac & vascular research will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信