Continuous positive airway pressure versus usual care for obstructive sleep apnoea in pregnancy: a two-step pilot trial.

IF 1.5 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Rachael Nugent, Caroline de Costa, Leonie Callaway, Shiv Erigadoo, Elise Gilbertson, Chris Brown, Joanna Perry-Keene, Rebekah Shakhovskoy, Lauren Kearney
{"title":"Continuous positive airway pressure versus usual care for obstructive sleep apnoea in pregnancy: a two-step pilot trial.","authors":"Rachael Nugent, Caroline de Costa, Leonie Callaway, Shiv Erigadoo, Elise Gilbertson, Chris Brown, Joanna Perry-Keene, Rebekah Shakhovskoy, Lauren Kearney","doi":"10.1186/s40814-025-01645-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is associated with increasing body mass index (BMI) and affects up to 15% of pregnant women. OSA in pregnancy can be associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) may be an effective treatment for OSA during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine the feasibility and acceptability of screening women with a BMI ≥ 35 kg/m<sup>2</sup> for OSA in pregnancy, followed by randomisation to treatment with CPAP or no CPAP for women diagnosed with moderate to severe OSA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a single-centre, two-stage pilot study. Firstly, all consenting participants were screened for OSA and then, only if diagnosed with moderate to severe OSA (AHI ≥ 15), randomised to CPAP or no CPAP. The feasibility of the OSA screening was determined by recruitment rates. A priori criteria of > 20% recruitment to the sleep study were considered feasible. The acceptability of the sleep study was examined using the completion rate and reasons for withdrawal prior to the sleep study. The acceptability of CPAP randomisation was assessed by completion rates for women randomised, adherence to CPAP, reasons for withdrawal, and the review of quality-of-life measures over the course of pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-six women with a BMI ≥ 35 kg/m<sup>2</sup> before 26 completed weeks of pregnancy were invited to participate from the Sunshine Coast University Hospital and Health Service. Overall, 36 women enrolled, giving a recruitment rate of 37%. A total of 75% (n = 26) of recruited women completed OSA screening (clinical history, questionnaires, and formal sleep study). Subsequently, six (6%) of invited women had an apnoea hypopnoea index (AHI) ≥ 15/h and were diagnosed with moderate to severe OSA and underwent randomisation to receive treatment with CPAP (n = 4) or no CPAP (n = 1) until birth. One woman withdrew after randomisation to treatment. Nine women withdrew prior to full completion of OSA screening and one following an inconclusive sleep study. Women who had a sleep study found it acceptable, and in women randomised to CPAP, adherence averaged 4.86 h/night. Quality-of-life measures were similar when measured over two time points in pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>A definitive trial screening women for OSA and subsequent randomisation to treatment or no treatment may be feasible. Future trials should be resourced to expand inclusion criteria, improve accessibility for participants, evaluate clinical and cost-effectiveness, and investigate partial treatment effects.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ACTRN, ACTRN12621001523897. Registered 9 September 2021 - retrospectively registered, https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Update/Step8_Update.aspx?id=382640.</p>","PeriodicalId":20176,"journal":{"name":"Pilot and Feasibility Studies","volume":"11 1","pages":"79"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12139340/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pilot and Feasibility Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-025-01645-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is associated with increasing body mass index (BMI) and affects up to 15% of pregnant women. OSA in pregnancy can be associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) may be an effective treatment for OSA during pregnancy.

Aim: To examine the feasibility and acceptability of screening women with a BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 for OSA in pregnancy, followed by randomisation to treatment with CPAP or no CPAP for women diagnosed with moderate to severe OSA.

Methods: This study was a single-centre, two-stage pilot study. Firstly, all consenting participants were screened for OSA and then, only if diagnosed with moderate to severe OSA (AHI ≥ 15), randomised to CPAP or no CPAP. The feasibility of the OSA screening was determined by recruitment rates. A priori criteria of > 20% recruitment to the sleep study were considered feasible. The acceptability of the sleep study was examined using the completion rate and reasons for withdrawal prior to the sleep study. The acceptability of CPAP randomisation was assessed by completion rates for women randomised, adherence to CPAP, reasons for withdrawal, and the review of quality-of-life measures over the course of pregnancy.

Results: Ninety-six women with a BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 before 26 completed weeks of pregnancy were invited to participate from the Sunshine Coast University Hospital and Health Service. Overall, 36 women enrolled, giving a recruitment rate of 37%. A total of 75% (n = 26) of recruited women completed OSA screening (clinical history, questionnaires, and formal sleep study). Subsequently, six (6%) of invited women had an apnoea hypopnoea index (AHI) ≥ 15/h and were diagnosed with moderate to severe OSA and underwent randomisation to receive treatment with CPAP (n = 4) or no CPAP (n = 1) until birth. One woman withdrew after randomisation to treatment. Nine women withdrew prior to full completion of OSA screening and one following an inconclusive sleep study. Women who had a sleep study found it acceptable, and in women randomised to CPAP, adherence averaged 4.86 h/night. Quality-of-life measures were similar when measured over two time points in pregnancy.

Discussion: A definitive trial screening women for OSA and subsequent randomisation to treatment or no treatment may be feasible. Future trials should be resourced to expand inclusion criteria, improve accessibility for participants, evaluate clinical and cost-effectiveness, and investigate partial treatment effects.

Trial registration: ACTRN, ACTRN12621001523897. Registered 9 September 2021 - retrospectively registered, https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Update/Step8_Update.aspx?id=382640.

妊娠期阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的持续气道正压与常规护理:两步先导试验
背景:阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)与体重指数(BMI)增加有关,影响高达15%的孕妇。妊娠期阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停可能与孕产妇和新生儿的不良结局有关。持续气道正压通气(CPAP)可能是妊娠期OSA的有效治疗方法。目的:探讨对BMI≥35 kg/m2的妊娠期OSA女性进行筛查的可行性和可接受性,随后对诊断为中重度OSA的女性进行CPAP治疗或不进行CPAP治疗的随机分组。方法:本研究为单中心、两阶段的先导研究。首先,对所有同意的参与者进行OSA筛查,然后,只有被诊断为中度至重度OSA (AHI≥15)的参与者,随机分配到CPAP组或无CPAP组。OSA筛查的可行性由招募率决定。我们认为,在睡眠研究中招募bbb - 20%的先验标准是可行的。使用睡眠研究前的完成率和退出原因来检查睡眠研究的可接受性。CPAP随机化的可接受性通过随机化妇女的完成率、对CPAP的依从性、停药原因和妊娠期间生活质量测量的回顾来评估。结果:从阳光海岸大学医院和卫生服务中心邀请96名怀孕26周前BMI≥35 kg/m2的妇女参加。总共有36名女性入学,录取率为37%。共有75% (n = 26)的招募女性完成了OSA筛查(临床病史、问卷调查和正式睡眠研究)。随后,6名(6%)受邀女性的呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)≥15/h,并被诊断为中度至重度OSA,随机分组接受CPAP治疗(n = 4)或不接受CPAP治疗(n = 1),直到出生。一名妇女在随机分组后退出治疗。九名妇女在完全完成OSA筛查之前退出,一名妇女在进行了一项不确定的睡眠研究后退出。接受睡眠研究的女性发现它是可以接受的,在随机接受CPAP的女性中,依从性平均为4.86小时/夜。怀孕期间两个时间点的生活质量测量结果相似。讨论:一项明确的试验筛选女性阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停,随后随机分配治疗或不治疗可能是可行的。未来的试验应扩大纳入标准,提高参与者的可及性,评估临床和成本效益,并调查部分治疗效果。试验注册号:ACTRN, ACTRN12621001523897。注册于2021年9月9日-追溯注册,https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Update/Step8_Update.aspx?id=382640。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Pilot and Feasibility Studies Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
241
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Pilot and Feasibility Studies encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of pilot and feasibility studies in biomedicine. The journal publishes research articles that are intended to directly influence future clinical trials or large scale observational studies, as well as protocols, commentaries and methodology articles. The journal also ensures that the results of all well-conducted, peer-reviewed, pilot and feasibility studies are published, regardless of outcome or significance of findings. Pilot and feasibility studies are increasingly conducted prior to a full randomized controlled trial. However, these studies often lack clear objectives, many remain unpublished, and there is confusion over the meanings of the words “pilot” and “feasibility”. Pilot and Feasibility Studies provides a forum for discussion around this key aspect of the scientific process, and seeks to ensure that these studies are published, so as to complete the publication thread for clinical research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信