Reliability of Preoperative MRI in the Prediction of ACL Tear Type.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2025-06-04 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1177/23259671251339491
David E Kantrowitz, Christon N Darden, Dennis M Bienstock, Hulaimatu Jalloh, Ashley M Rosenberg, Sean McMillan, James N Gladstone, Shawn G Anthony
{"title":"Reliability of Preoperative MRI in the Prediction of ACL Tear Type.","authors":"David E Kantrowitz, Christon N Darden, Dennis M Bienstock, Hulaimatu Jalloh, Ashley M Rosenberg, Sean McMillan, James N Gladstone, Shawn G Anthony","doi":"10.1177/23259671251339491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are common among active patients and can be managed with primary repair or reconstruction. The most important predictor of good outcomes after primary repair is a more proximal tear location. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guides surgical decision making, but the accuracy of MRI in identifying tear location is understudied.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the accuracy of preoperative MRI in identifying ACL tear location.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent ACL reconstruction or repair by 2 surgeons at a single, urban academic medical center between 2019 and 2024 were collected. Exclusion criteria included previous ACL surgery and inadequate preoperative or intraoperative imaging. The location of the ACL tear on preoperative MRI scan was retrospectively graded using the modified Sherman classification in a blinded manner. Reference diagnosis was the tear location as noted in the surgeon's operative note and confirmed with arthroscopic images. The primary endpoint was the accuracy of MRI for predicting intraoperative tear type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 203 patients were included in this study. MRI accurately predicted the ACL tear type seen arthroscopically only 35.5% (72/203) of the time. When MRI did not match the arthroscopic diagnosis, the MRI was within 1 classification grade 74.8% (98/131) of the time. Of the incorrect gradings, 71.0% (93/131) were overclassifications (MRI tear classification more distal than found during arthroscopy). MRI was more sensitive in detecting proximal third (type II) and midsubstance (type III) tears (43.7% and 51.6%, respectively) than it was for detecting proximal avulsion (type I) tears (2.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MRI was unreliable for determining the precise location of an ACL tear. MRI tended to overestimate how distal a tear was compared with arthroscopic findings, which may influence patient counseling, preoperative planning, and surgical decision making.</p>","PeriodicalId":19646,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"13 6","pages":"23259671251339491"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12138214/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671251339491","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are common among active patients and can be managed with primary repair or reconstruction. The most important predictor of good outcomes after primary repair is a more proximal tear location. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guides surgical decision making, but the accuracy of MRI in identifying tear location is understudied.

Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of preoperative MRI in identifying ACL tear location.

Study design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

Methods: Patients who underwent ACL reconstruction or repair by 2 surgeons at a single, urban academic medical center between 2019 and 2024 were collected. Exclusion criteria included previous ACL surgery and inadequate preoperative or intraoperative imaging. The location of the ACL tear on preoperative MRI scan was retrospectively graded using the modified Sherman classification in a blinded manner. Reference diagnosis was the tear location as noted in the surgeon's operative note and confirmed with arthroscopic images. The primary endpoint was the accuracy of MRI for predicting intraoperative tear type.

Results: A total of 203 patients were included in this study. MRI accurately predicted the ACL tear type seen arthroscopically only 35.5% (72/203) of the time. When MRI did not match the arthroscopic diagnosis, the MRI was within 1 classification grade 74.8% (98/131) of the time. Of the incorrect gradings, 71.0% (93/131) were overclassifications (MRI tear classification more distal than found during arthroscopy). MRI was more sensitive in detecting proximal third (type II) and midsubstance (type III) tears (43.7% and 51.6%, respectively) than it was for detecting proximal avulsion (type I) tears (2.5%).

Conclusion: MRI was unreliable for determining the precise location of an ACL tear. MRI tended to overestimate how distal a tear was compared with arthroscopic findings, which may influence patient counseling, preoperative planning, and surgical decision making.

术前MRI预测ACL撕裂类型的可靠性。
背景:前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤在运动患者中很常见,可以通过初级修复或重建来处理。初次修复后良好预后的最重要预测因素是撕裂位置更近。术前磁共振成像(MRI)指导手术决策,但MRI识别撕裂位置的准确性尚待研究。目的:评价术前MRI识别前交叉韧带撕裂位置的准确性。研究设计:队列研究(诊断);证据等级2。方法:收集2019年至2024年间在单一城市学术医疗中心接受2名外科医生重建或修复ACL的患者。排除标准包括既往ACL手术和术前或术中影像学检查不充分。术前MRI扫描的ACL撕裂位置采用改进的Sherman分级,采用盲法回顾性分级。参考诊断是在外科医生的手术记录中记录的撕裂位置,并通过关节镜图像确认。主要终点是MRI预测术中撕裂类型的准确性。结果:本研究共纳入203例患者。MRI准确预测关节镜下ACL撕裂类型的概率仅为35.5%(72/203)。当MRI与关节镜诊断不匹配时,74.8%(98/131)的MRI在1级以内。在不正确的分级中,71.0%(93/131)被过度分类(MRI撕裂分类比关节镜检查发现的远端撕裂分类更多)。MRI检测近端三分型(II型)和中分型(III型)撕裂(分别为43.7%和51.6%)比检测近端撕脱型(I型)撕裂(2.5%)更敏感。结论:MRI对于确定前交叉韧带撕裂的精确位置是不可靠的。与关节镜检查结果相比,MRI倾向于高估远端撕裂的程度,这可能会影响患者咨询、术前计划和手术决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
876
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (OJSM), developed by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), is a global, peer-reviewed, open access journal that combines the interests of researchers and clinical practitioners across orthopaedic sports medicine, arthroscopy, and knee arthroplasty. Topics include original research in the areas of: -Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, including surgical and nonsurgical treatment of orthopaedic sports injuries -Arthroscopic Surgery (Shoulder/Elbow/Wrist/Hip/Knee/Ankle/Foot) -Relevant translational research -Sports traumatology/epidemiology -Knee and shoulder arthroplasty The OJSM also publishes relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信