Clear Liquid Fasting Guidelines for Pediatric Patients: A Survey of the Society for Pediatric Anesthesia.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Todd A Glenski, Michelle Wu, Christian Taylor, Emily Weisberg, Nichole Doyle
{"title":"Clear Liquid Fasting Guidelines for Pediatric Patients: A Survey of the Society for Pediatric Anesthesia.","authors":"Todd A Glenski, Michelle Wu, Christian Taylor, Emily Weisberg, Nichole Doyle","doi":"10.1111/pan.15140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Recently, several international anesthesia societies have updated their guidelines by shortening the NPO clear liquid time from 2 to 1 h in children. When the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) released their interim update to the preoperative fasting guidelines, they maintained the 2-h clear liquid fasting recommendation, while advising the use of clinical judgment for cases involving PO intake within 2 h. Given international support for decreased NPO times, we aimed to evaluate the current practice and opinions of the Society for Pediatric Anesthesia (SPA) members regarding clear liquid NPO times.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 17-question survey was developed by members of Children's Mercy Kansas City Department of Anesthesiology and submitted to the SPA Research Committee for review. After approval, a survey link and QR code were distributed to all SPA members.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 430 surveys (9.85%) were completed. Seventy-three percent indicated that their department follows a 2-h NPO policy for clear liquids, while 24% reported a 1-h policy. Overall, 71% of respondents felt that 1-h is the ideal NPO time for clear liquids. Of the respondents whose department follows a 2-h policy, 86% believe their NPO policy would be shortened if ASA guidelines were updated to 1-h. Forty-nine percent of respondents reported that NPO instructions to patients are congruent with departmental policies, while 33% reported that NPO instructions differ from departmental NPO policies.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The results demonstrate that although only a small number of respondents practice a 1-h policy, most respondents believe that a 1-h policy is ideal. This discrepancy is potentially due to adherence to ASA practice guidelines/recommendations, as 86% of respondents who have an NPO policy of 2 or more hours indicated that their departments would switch to 1-h if the ASA were to revise their guideline.</p>","PeriodicalId":19745,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.15140","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Recently, several international anesthesia societies have updated their guidelines by shortening the NPO clear liquid time from 2 to 1 h in children. When the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) released their interim update to the preoperative fasting guidelines, they maintained the 2-h clear liquid fasting recommendation, while advising the use of clinical judgment for cases involving PO intake within 2 h. Given international support for decreased NPO times, we aimed to evaluate the current practice and opinions of the Society for Pediatric Anesthesia (SPA) members regarding clear liquid NPO times.

Methods: A 17-question survey was developed by members of Children's Mercy Kansas City Department of Anesthesiology and submitted to the SPA Research Committee for review. After approval, a survey link and QR code were distributed to all SPA members.

Results: A total of 430 surveys (9.85%) were completed. Seventy-three percent indicated that their department follows a 2-h NPO policy for clear liquids, while 24% reported a 1-h policy. Overall, 71% of respondents felt that 1-h is the ideal NPO time for clear liquids. Of the respondents whose department follows a 2-h policy, 86% believe their NPO policy would be shortened if ASA guidelines were updated to 1-h. Forty-nine percent of respondents reported that NPO instructions to patients are congruent with departmental policies, while 33% reported that NPO instructions differ from departmental NPO policies.

Discussion: The results demonstrate that although only a small number of respondents practice a 1-h policy, most respondents believe that a 1-h policy is ideal. This discrepancy is potentially due to adherence to ASA practice guidelines/recommendations, as 86% of respondents who have an NPO policy of 2 or more hours indicated that their departments would switch to 1-h if the ASA were to revise their guideline.

儿科患者清饮指南:儿科麻醉学会调查
最近,几个国际麻醉学会更新了他们的指南,将儿童NPO清液时间从2小时缩短到1小时。当美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)发布了他们的中期更新术前禁食指南时,他们维持了2小时清液禁食的建议,同时建议在2小时内摄入PO的病例使用临床判断。鉴于国际上对减少NPO时间的支持,我们旨在评估儿科麻醉学会(SPA)成员关于透明液体NPO时间的现行做法和意见。方法:由堪萨斯城儿童慈善医院麻醉科成员编制了一份包含17个问题的调查问卷,并提交给美国儿科协会研究委员会审查。通过审核后,将调查链接和二维码分发给所有SPA会员。结果:共完成调查430份(9.85%)。73%的人表示,他们的部门遵循清洁液体的2小时NPO政策,而24%的人报告了1小时的政策。总体而言,71%的受访者认为1小时是清洁液体的理想NPO时间。在遵循2小时政策的部门中,86%的受访者认为,如果ASA指南更新为1小时,他们的NPO政策将缩短。49%的受访者表示,对患者的NPO指示与部门政策一致,而33%的受访者表示,NPO指示与部门的NPO政策不同。讨论:结果表明,尽管只有少数受访者实行1小时政策,但大多数受访者认为1小时政策是理想的。这种差异可能是由于遵守ASA实践指南/建议,因为86%的NPO政策为2小时或更长时间的受访者表示,如果ASA修改其指南,他们的部门将改为1小时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Anesthesia
Pediatric Anesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
222
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Devoted to the dissemination of research of interest and importance to practising anesthetists everywhere, the scientific and clinical content of Pediatric Anesthesia covers a wide selection of medical disciplines in all areas relevant to paediatric anaesthesia, pain management and peri-operative medicine. The International Editorial Board is supported by the Editorial Advisory Board and a team of Senior Advisors, to ensure that the journal is publishing the best work from the front line of research in the field. The journal publishes high-quality, relevant scientific and clinical research papers, reviews, commentaries, pro-con debates, historical vignettes, correspondence, case presentations and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信