Engage: A bystander intervention training for U.S. Army soldiers.

IF 1.3 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Ian A Gutierrez, Shelby N Anderson, Coleen L Crouch, Amy B Adler
{"title":"Engage: A bystander intervention training for U.S. Army soldiers.","authors":"Ian A Gutierrez, Shelby N Anderson, Coleen L Crouch, Amy B Adler","doi":"10.1080/08995605.2025.2497573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Drug and alcohol misuse, sexual misconduct, and suicidal behaviors can negatively affect the well-being of personnel in high-risk occupations and compromise organizational effectiveness. While the U.S. Army has established policies, programs, and a professional prevention workforce to reduce the occurrence of these behaviors, soldiers who are in the presence of their at-risk peers are best positioned to intervene. Thus, to leverage the impact of peer-based bystander intervention, the Army developed a two-hour training entitled \"Engage.\" Engage provides soldiers with instruction on fostering awareness of risky behaviors, taking responsibility in situations where such behaviors may occur, and having a plan of action for intervening on behalf of those at risk. A longitudinal quasi-randomized evaluation of Engage was conducted with active-duty soldiers over a nine-month period. Eight companies were assigned to receive Engage, and eight companies were assigned to a control condition. Surveys assessed training acceptability, knowledge related to bystander behaviors, confidence in intervening, and perceptions of unit engagement. Soldiers found the training to be acceptable, evidenced improved knowledge of bystander intervention concepts following training, and perceived their units to be more engaged in bystander practices over time. Longitudinal assessment of soldiers' confidence in intervening was moderate to high at baseline; while confidence remained stable over multiple follow-up assessments, no significant changes were observed due to training. These findings highlight the potential value of tailoring bystander intervention training for service members. Results also provide direction for improving such training for the military and other high-risk occupations.</p>","PeriodicalId":18696,"journal":{"name":"Military Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Military Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2025.2497573","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Drug and alcohol misuse, sexual misconduct, and suicidal behaviors can negatively affect the well-being of personnel in high-risk occupations and compromise organizational effectiveness. While the U.S. Army has established policies, programs, and a professional prevention workforce to reduce the occurrence of these behaviors, soldiers who are in the presence of their at-risk peers are best positioned to intervene. Thus, to leverage the impact of peer-based bystander intervention, the Army developed a two-hour training entitled "Engage." Engage provides soldiers with instruction on fostering awareness of risky behaviors, taking responsibility in situations where such behaviors may occur, and having a plan of action for intervening on behalf of those at risk. A longitudinal quasi-randomized evaluation of Engage was conducted with active-duty soldiers over a nine-month period. Eight companies were assigned to receive Engage, and eight companies were assigned to a control condition. Surveys assessed training acceptability, knowledge related to bystander behaviors, confidence in intervening, and perceptions of unit engagement. Soldiers found the training to be acceptable, evidenced improved knowledge of bystander intervention concepts following training, and perceived their units to be more engaged in bystander practices over time. Longitudinal assessment of soldiers' confidence in intervening was moderate to high at baseline; while confidence remained stable over multiple follow-up assessments, no significant changes were observed due to training. These findings highlight the potential value of tailoring bystander intervention training for service members. Results also provide direction for improving such training for the military and other high-risk occupations.

参与:美国陆军士兵的旁观者干预训练。
药物和酒精滥用、不当性行为和自杀行为会对高风险职业人员的福祉产生负面影响,并损害组织效率。虽然美国陆军已经制定了政策、计划和专业的预防工作人员来减少这些行为的发生,但与有风险的同伴在一起的士兵最有资格进行干预。因此,为了利用基于同伴的旁观者干预的影响,陆军开发了一项名为“参与”的两小时培训。参与为士兵提供指导,培养对危险行为的认识,在可能发生此类行为的情况下承担责任,并制定行动计划,以代表处于危险中的人进行干预。对现役士兵进行了为期9个月的纵向准随机评估。8个公司被分配到交战状态,8个公司被分配到控制状态。调查评估了培训的可接受性、与旁观者行为相关的知识、干预的信心和对单位参与的感知。士兵们发现训练是可以接受的,证明了训练后对旁观者干预概念的了解有所提高,并且随着时间的推移,他们认为自己的部队更参与旁观者实践。士兵干预信心的纵向评价在基线时为中高水平;虽然信心在多次随访评估中保持稳定,但没有观察到由于培训而产生的显著变化。这些发现突出了为服务人员量身定制的旁观者干预培训的潜在价值。研究结果也为改善军事和其他高风险职业的此类训练提供了方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Military Psychology
Military Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Military Psychology is the quarterly journal of Division 19 (Society for Military Psychology) of the American Psychological Association. The journal seeks to facilitate the scientific development of military psychology by encouraging communication between researchers and practitioners. The domain of military psychology is the conduct of research or practice of psychological principles within a military environment. The journal publishes behavioral science research articles having military applications in the areas of clinical and health psychology, training and human factors, manpower and personnel, social and organizational systems, and testing and measurement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信