Cognitive debriefing of the Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis.

IF 1.4 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Dinesh Khanna, George J Greene, Chelsea Rose Perschon, Marzieh Jamali, Virginia Steen, Thomas Medsger, Gurkirpal Singh, David Cella
{"title":"Cognitive debriefing of the Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis.","authors":"Dinesh Khanna, George J Greene, Chelsea Rose Perschon, Marzieh Jamali, Virginia Steen, Thomas Medsger, Gurkirpal Singh, David Cella","doi":"10.1177/23971983251334162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Systemic sclerosis (scleroderma) is associated with functional disability and poor quality of life. Patient-reported outcome measures provide valuable insights into patients' experiences, symptoms, and perceptions of their health. The Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and the Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (S-HAQ) are widely used patient-reported outcome measures in scleroderma research and clinical care. However, there is lack of data to (a) ensure and document patients with systemic sclerosis understand the concepts contained in these measure and (b) demonstrate face, item, and content validity for these items and measures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted cognitive debriefing of the S-HAQ in patients with diffuse cutaneous systemc sclerosis (dcSSc). The S-HAQ includes the HAQ-DI, a 20-item questionnaire that assesses functional ability for performing day-to-day activities, four systemic sclerosis-specific items that assess scleroderma symptoms, and one item on overall scleroderma-related limitations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total sample of patients with dcSSc (N = 20) had a mean age of 57.6 years and average disease duration of 3.4 years. For the HAQ-DI, the participants understood the concepts and the items were clear. In addition, majority (60%-100%) of participants reported using aids and devices to perform activities of daily living and/or utilizing assistance from another person. The systemic sclerosis-specific items of the S-HAQ were relevant to participants but required revisions to item wording and response options, including a change from the visual analog scales to numerical rating scales.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The HAQ-DI and S-HAQ systemic sclerosis-specific items demonstrated content and item validity, respectively. Several minor modifications were made to the S-HAQ instructions, item wording, and rating scales.</p>","PeriodicalId":17036,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Scleroderma and Related Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"23971983251334162"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12133776/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Scleroderma and Related Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23971983251334162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Systemic sclerosis (scleroderma) is associated with functional disability and poor quality of life. Patient-reported outcome measures provide valuable insights into patients' experiences, symptoms, and perceptions of their health. The Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and the Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (S-HAQ) are widely used patient-reported outcome measures in scleroderma research and clinical care. However, there is lack of data to (a) ensure and document patients with systemic sclerosis understand the concepts contained in these measure and (b) demonstrate face, item, and content validity for these items and measures.

Methods: We conducted cognitive debriefing of the S-HAQ in patients with diffuse cutaneous systemc sclerosis (dcSSc). The S-HAQ includes the HAQ-DI, a 20-item questionnaire that assesses functional ability for performing day-to-day activities, four systemic sclerosis-specific items that assess scleroderma symptoms, and one item on overall scleroderma-related limitations.

Results: The total sample of patients with dcSSc (N = 20) had a mean age of 57.6 years and average disease duration of 3.4 years. For the HAQ-DI, the participants understood the concepts and the items were clear. In addition, majority (60%-100%) of participants reported using aids and devices to perform activities of daily living and/or utilizing assistance from another person. The systemic sclerosis-specific items of the S-HAQ were relevant to participants but required revisions to item wording and response options, including a change from the visual analog scales to numerical rating scales.

Conclusion: The HAQ-DI and S-HAQ systemic sclerosis-specific items demonstrated content and item validity, respectively. Several minor modifications were made to the S-HAQ instructions, item wording, and rating scales.

弥漫性皮肤系统性硬化症患者硬皮病健康评估问卷的认知述评。
背景:系统性硬化症(硬皮病)与功能障碍和生活质量差有关。患者报告的结果测量为患者的经历、症状和对其健康的看法提供了宝贵的见解。健康评估问卷-残疾指数(HAQ-DI)和硬皮病健康评估问卷(S-HAQ)是硬皮病研究和临床护理中广泛使用的患者报告结果指标。然而,缺乏数据来(a)确保和记录系统性硬化症患者理解这些测量中包含的概念,以及(b)证明这些项目和测量的表面、项目和内容效度。方法:我们对弥漫性皮肤系统硬化症(dcSSc)患者的S-HAQ进行认知汇报。S-HAQ包括HAQ-DI,这是一份包含20个项目的问卷,用于评估日常活动的功能能力,四个系统性硬化症特定项目用于评估硬皮病症状,一个项目用于评估硬皮病相关的总体限制。结果:本组患者共20例,平均年龄57.6岁,平均病程3.4年。对于HAQ-DI,参与者理解概念,项目清晰。此外,大多数(60%-100%)参与者报告使用辅助设备和设备进行日常生活活动和/或利用他人的帮助。S-HAQ的系统性硬化症特异性项目与参与者相关,但需要修改项目措辞和回答选项,包括从视觉模拟量表改为数字评定量表。结论:HAQ-DI和S-HAQ系统性硬化症专项量表分别具有较高的内容和效度。对S-HAQ的说明、项目措辞和评定量表进行了几项小的修改。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信