Mehmet Berksun Tutan, Ramazan Topcu, İbrahim Tayfun Şahiner
{"title":"Differences between xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis and gallbladder adenocarcinoma: an 11-year retrospective study.","authors":"Mehmet Berksun Tutan, Ramazan Topcu, İbrahim Tayfun Şahiner","doi":"10.1007/s11739-025-04007-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis (XGC) is a benign yet locally aggressive inflammatory condition that often mimics gallbladder adenocarcinoma (GBC) in clinical, radiological, and intraoperative presentation, leading to diagnostic uncertainty and potential overtreatment. This retrospective study aimed to identify distinguishing features between XGC and GBC by analyzing demographic, clinical, biochemical, radiological, and histopathological data from 133 patients who underwent cholecystectomy between 2013 and 2024. Among them, 115 were diagnosed with XGC and 18 with GBC. Gallbladder wall thickness ≥ 7.5 mm was identified as the most powerful predictor of malignancy, demonstrating 94.4% sensitivity, 84.3% specificity, and a 99% negative predictive value. Additional parameters associated with GBC included advanced age (≥ 65.5 years), anemia (hemoglobin ≤ 11.45 g/dL), thrombocytopenia (platelet count ≤ 215 × 10⁹/L), and mild hyponatremia (sodium ≤ 137.5 mmol/L), though their individual diagnostic performance was limited. Gallbladder polyps were significantly more prevalent in GBC cases. While conversion to open surgery was frequent in both groups due to technical complexity, it was not significantly different. These findings highlight the critical role of gallbladder wall thickness as a non-invasive, reliable diagnostic marker, particularly when combined with patient age and laboratory indicators. Incorporating these parameters into the preoperative assessment may improve diagnostic accuracy, reduce unnecessary radical procedures in benign conditions such as XGC, and facilitate timely intervention in malignancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":13662,"journal":{"name":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-025-04007-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis (XGC) is a benign yet locally aggressive inflammatory condition that often mimics gallbladder adenocarcinoma (GBC) in clinical, radiological, and intraoperative presentation, leading to diagnostic uncertainty and potential overtreatment. This retrospective study aimed to identify distinguishing features between XGC and GBC by analyzing demographic, clinical, biochemical, radiological, and histopathological data from 133 patients who underwent cholecystectomy between 2013 and 2024. Among them, 115 were diagnosed with XGC and 18 with GBC. Gallbladder wall thickness ≥ 7.5 mm was identified as the most powerful predictor of malignancy, demonstrating 94.4% sensitivity, 84.3% specificity, and a 99% negative predictive value. Additional parameters associated with GBC included advanced age (≥ 65.5 years), anemia (hemoglobin ≤ 11.45 g/dL), thrombocytopenia (platelet count ≤ 215 × 10⁹/L), and mild hyponatremia (sodium ≤ 137.5 mmol/L), though their individual diagnostic performance was limited. Gallbladder polyps were significantly more prevalent in GBC cases. While conversion to open surgery was frequent in both groups due to technical complexity, it was not significantly different. These findings highlight the critical role of gallbladder wall thickness as a non-invasive, reliable diagnostic marker, particularly when combined with patient age and laboratory indicators. Incorporating these parameters into the preoperative assessment may improve diagnostic accuracy, reduce unnecessary radical procedures in benign conditions such as XGC, and facilitate timely intervention in malignancy.
期刊介绍:
Internal and Emergency Medicine (IEM) is an independent, international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal designed for internists and emergency physicians. IEM publishes a variety of manuscript types including Original investigations, Review articles, Letters to the Editor, Editorials and Commentaries. Occasionally IEM accepts unsolicited Reviews, Commentaries or Editorials. The journal is divided into three sections, i.e., Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment, with three separate editorial boards. In the Internal Medicine section, invited Case records and Physical examinations, devoted to underlining the role of a clinical approach in selected clinical cases, are also published. The Emergency Medicine section will include a Morbidity and Mortality Report and an Airway Forum concerning the management of difficult airway problems. As far as Critical Care is becoming an integral part of Emergency Medicine, a new sub-section will report the literature that concerns the interface not only for the care of the critical patient in the Emergency Department, but also in the Intensive Care Unit. Finally, in the Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment section brief discussions of topics of evidence-based medicine (Cochrane’s corner) and Research updates are published. IEM encourages letters of rebuttal and criticism of published articles. Topics of interest include all subjects that relate to the science and practice of Internal and Emergency Medicine.