Impact of image reconstruction on cerebral blood flow measured with 15O-water positron emission tomography.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Elin Bäck, My Jonasson, Elin Lindström, Andreas Tolf, Joachim Burman, Lieuwe Appel, Mark Lubberink
{"title":"Impact of image reconstruction on cerebral blood flow measured with <sup>15</sup>O-water positron emission tomography.","authors":"Elin Bäck, My Jonasson, Elin Lindström, Andreas Tolf, Joachim Burman, Lieuwe Appel, Mark Lubberink","doi":"10.1186/s40658-025-00760-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong><sup>15</sup>O-water positron emission tomography (PET) is considered the gold standard method for non-invasive measurement of cerebral blood flow (CBF). However, previously published average CBF values in healthy subjects have varied greatly and the cause of these variations remains unclear. This study investigates how image reconstruction methods and spatial resolution affect CBF measurements with <sup>15</sup>O-water PET.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight healthy subjects each underwent dynamic <sup>15</sup>O-water PET scans with continuous arterial blood sampling. Images were reconstructed using two different algorithms; ordered subset expectation maximisation and block sequential regularised expectation maximalisation with varying reconstruction parameters. CBF was estimated for the whole brain, grey matter, and central white matter. Reconstruction-specific effective spatial resolution was estimated using phantom measurements and simulations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean whole brain CBF was 0.48 mL/cm<sup>3</sup>/min and showed little dependence on the image reconstruction method. Grey matter CBF varied between 0.52 and 0.57 mL/cm<sup>3</sup>/min, and central white matter CBF between 0.20 and 0.28 mL/cm<sup>3</sup>/min. Regional CBF showed great dependence on effective spatial resolution with a negative correlation between grey matter CBF and resolution (r = -0.96) and a positive correlation between central white matter and resolution (r = 0.93).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study concludes that grey matter and central white matter CBF, but not whole brain CBF measured with quantitative <sup>15</sup>O-water PET is reconstruction method dependent, mainly due to varying spatial resolution with consequent partial volume effects. Variations in published CBF values cannot be explained solely by reconstruction methods or spatial resolution.</p>","PeriodicalId":11559,"journal":{"name":"EJNMMI Physics","volume":"12 1","pages":"52"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12144024/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJNMMI Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-025-00760-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: 15O-water positron emission tomography (PET) is considered the gold standard method for non-invasive measurement of cerebral blood flow (CBF). However, previously published average CBF values in healthy subjects have varied greatly and the cause of these variations remains unclear. This study investigates how image reconstruction methods and spatial resolution affect CBF measurements with 15O-water PET.

Methods: Eight healthy subjects each underwent dynamic 15O-water PET scans with continuous arterial blood sampling. Images were reconstructed using two different algorithms; ordered subset expectation maximisation and block sequential regularised expectation maximalisation with varying reconstruction parameters. CBF was estimated for the whole brain, grey matter, and central white matter. Reconstruction-specific effective spatial resolution was estimated using phantom measurements and simulations.

Results: The mean whole brain CBF was 0.48 mL/cm3/min and showed little dependence on the image reconstruction method. Grey matter CBF varied between 0.52 and 0.57 mL/cm3/min, and central white matter CBF between 0.20 and 0.28 mL/cm3/min. Regional CBF showed great dependence on effective spatial resolution with a negative correlation between grey matter CBF and resolution (r = -0.96) and a positive correlation between central white matter and resolution (r = 0.93).

Conclusion: This study concludes that grey matter and central white matter CBF, but not whole brain CBF measured with quantitative 15O-water PET is reconstruction method dependent, mainly due to varying spatial resolution with consequent partial volume effects. Variations in published CBF values cannot be explained solely by reconstruction methods or spatial resolution.

图像重建对15o -水正电子发射断层扫描测量脑血流的影响。
背景:15o -水正电子发射断层扫描(PET)被认为是无创测量脑血流量(CBF)的金标准方法。然而,先前公布的健康受试者的平均CBF值差异很大,这些差异的原因尚不清楚。本研究探讨了图像重建方法和空间分辨率对15O-water PET测量CBF的影响。方法:对8名健康受试者进行动态15o水PET扫描,并连续动脉采血。使用两种不同的算法重构图像;具有不同重构参数的有序子集期望最大化和块顺序正则化期望最大化。估计全脑、灰质和中央白质的CBF。重建特定的有效空间分辨率估计使用幻像测量和模拟。结果:全脑CBF均值为0.48 mL/cm3/min,对图像重建方法的依赖性较小。灰质CBF在0.52 ~ 0.57 mL/cm3/min之间,中央白质CBF在0.20 ~ 0.28 mL/cm3/min之间。区域脑流量对有效空间分辨率的依赖程度较高,灰质脑流量与分辨率呈负相关(r = -0.96),而中央白质脑流量与分辨率呈正相关(r = 0.93)。结论:定量15o -水PET测量的灰质和中央白质脑CBF依赖于重建方法,但不依赖于全脑脑CBF,主要是由于空间分辨率不同导致部分体积效应。公布的CBF值的变化不能仅仅用重建方法或空间分辨率来解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EJNMMI Physics
EJNMMI Physics Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
78
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: EJNMMI Physics is an international platform for scientists, users and adopters of nuclear medicine with a particular interest in physics matters. As a companion journal to the European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, this journal has a multi-disciplinary approach and welcomes original materials and studies with a focus on applied physics and mathematics as well as imaging systems engineering and prototyping in nuclear medicine. This includes physics-driven approaches or algorithms supported by physics that foster early clinical adoption of nuclear medicine imaging and therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信