Deprescribing Antipsychotics and Proton Pump Inhibitors in Long-Term Care: A Prescribing Portraits Approach.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Nooreen Haji, Aaron M Tejani, Anthony Tung, Ying Wang, Deborah Heidary, Wade Thompson, Carolyn Bubbar
{"title":"Deprescribing Antipsychotics and Proton Pump Inhibitors in Long-Term Care: A Prescribing Portraits Approach.","authors":"Nooreen Haji, Aaron M Tejani, Anthony Tung, Ying Wang, Deborah Heidary, Wade Thompson, Carolyn Bubbar","doi":"10.1007/s40266-025-01217-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Antipsychotics (APs) and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly prescribed in long-term care (LTC) despite potential risks with prolonged use.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluates the frequency of AP and PPI prescriptions and assesses the impact of \"prescribing portraits\" on deprescribing in LTC residents at 2 LTC facilities in British Columbia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, prospective quality improvement (QI) study was conducted at two LTC homes: Holy Family Hospital (site A) and Queen's Park Care Centre (site B). The QI approach involved collecting data on prescribing appropriateness, implementing a real-time intervention, and tracking its impact. Prescribing portraits-personalized reports detailing individual prescribing patterns, evidence-based indications, and deprescribing recommendations-were presented to prescribers by clinical pharmacists. The primary outcomes were the proportion of prescriptions eligible for deprescribing and the deprescribing rate at 3 months post-intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At site A, 21 of 48 residents receiving AP were identified as eligible for deprescribing, with 31.6% receiving deprescribing orders within 3 months. Among 12 residents previously assessed in our earlier QI study at site A who remained on PPIs, 33% were newly deprescribed after reassessment in this study. At site B, 23 of 48 residents on antipsychotics were eligible, with a deprescribing rate of 20%. For PPIs, 31 of 38 residents were considered eligible at site B, and 36% had deprescribing orders initiated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Integrating prescribing portraits into multidisciplinary medication reviews promotes appropriate deprescribing of APs and PPIs in LTC, encouraging safer prescribing practices and improving medication safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs & Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-025-01217-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Antipsychotics (APs) and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly prescribed in long-term care (LTC) despite potential risks with prolonged use.

Objective: This study evaluates the frequency of AP and PPI prescriptions and assesses the impact of "prescribing portraits" on deprescribing in LTC residents at 2 LTC facilities in British Columbia.

Methods: This multicenter, prospective quality improvement (QI) study was conducted at two LTC homes: Holy Family Hospital (site A) and Queen's Park Care Centre (site B). The QI approach involved collecting data on prescribing appropriateness, implementing a real-time intervention, and tracking its impact. Prescribing portraits-personalized reports detailing individual prescribing patterns, evidence-based indications, and deprescribing recommendations-were presented to prescribers by clinical pharmacists. The primary outcomes were the proportion of prescriptions eligible for deprescribing and the deprescribing rate at 3 months post-intervention.

Results: At site A, 21 of 48 residents receiving AP were identified as eligible for deprescribing, with 31.6% receiving deprescribing orders within 3 months. Among 12 residents previously assessed in our earlier QI study at site A who remained on PPIs, 33% were newly deprescribed after reassessment in this study. At site B, 23 of 48 residents on antipsychotics were eligible, with a deprescribing rate of 20%. For PPIs, 31 of 38 residents were considered eligible at site B, and 36% had deprescribing orders initiated.

Conclusions: Integrating prescribing portraits into multidisciplinary medication reviews promotes appropriate deprescribing of APs and PPIs in LTC, encouraging safer prescribing practices and improving medication safety.

在长期护理中减少抗精神病药物和质子泵抑制剂的处方:处方肖像方法。
抗精神病药(APs)和质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)通常用于长期护理(LTC),尽管长期使用存在潜在风险。目的:本研究评估了不列颠哥伦比亚省2家LTC机构LTC居民的AP和PPI处方频率,并评估了“处方肖像”对处方的影响。方法:这项多中心、前瞻性质量改善(QI)研究在两个LTC家庭进行:圣家医院(地点A)和皇后公园护理中心(地点B)。QI方法包括收集关于处方适当性的数据,实施实时干预,并跟踪其影响。处方画像——详细描述个人处方模式、循证适应症和处方推荐的个性化报告——由临床药剂师提交给处方者。主要观察指标为干预后3个月符合处方减处方条件的处方比例和减处方率。结果:在A点,48名接受AP治疗的居民中有21人符合处方解除条件,其中31.6%的人在3个月内收到处方解除单。在我们先前在A点进行的QI研究中评估的12名仍在使用PPIs的居民中,33%在本研究中重新评估后重新开处方。在B点,48名服用抗精神病药物的居民中有23名符合条件,处方解约率为20%。对于PPIs, 38名居民中有31人被认为符合B点的条件,36%的人已经启动了处方订单。结论:将处方画像整合到多学科药物评价中,可促进LTC中ap和ppi的适当开处方,鼓励更安全的处方做法,提高用药安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drugs & Aging
Drugs & Aging 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Drugs & Aging delivers essential information on the most important aspects of drug therapy to professionals involved in the care of the elderly. The journal addresses in a timely way the major issues relating to drug therapy in older adults including: the management of specific diseases, particularly those associated with aging, age-related physiological changes impacting drug therapy, drug utilization and prescribing in the elderly, polypharmacy and drug interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信