Modic Changes Are Associated With Increased Pain Intensity, Greater Disability, and Reduced Quality of Life in Low Back Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Daishui Yang, Bernhard U Hoehl, Lukas Schönnagel, Lukas Mödl, Tianwei Zhang, Sihai Liu, Sandra Reitmaier, Lena Fleig, Matthias Pumberger, Hendrik Schmidt
{"title":"Modic Changes Are Associated With Increased Pain Intensity, Greater Disability, and Reduced Quality of Life in Low Back Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Daishui Yang, Bernhard U Hoehl, Lukas Schönnagel, Lukas Mödl, Tianwei Zhang, Sihai Liu, Sandra Reitmaier, Lena Fleig, Matthias Pumberger, Hendrik Schmidt","doi":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low back pain (LBP) is a common health problem and a major contributor to disability. Modic changes, or vertebral marrow changes visible on MRI, are frequently observed in individuals with LBP. However, there is inconsistent evidence assessing the relationship between Modic changes and LBP, pain-related disability, and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Questions/purposes: </strong>(1) Are Modic change parameters, including their type, number, and extent, positively associated with the characteristics of LBP, particularly when classified into intermittent LBP and chronic LBP? (2) Are Modic change parameters associated with participant-reported longer duration and higher intensity of LBP? (3) Are Modic change parameters associated with worsened pain-related disability and poorer quality of life?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a Phase III, single-center, cross-sectional analysis drawing its data from the ongoing Berlin Back Study (research unit FOR5177). A total of 1218 participants who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were recruited between January 2022 and January 2024. Of these, 18% (217 of 1218) were excluded because of the lack of results from orthopaedic clinical examination and MRI evaluation. After clinical examination and completion of questionnaires, another 24% (289 of 1218) were excluded because of pain in other locations or pain experienced in the past, leaving 58% (712 of 1218) of participants in our study. The individuals included in this study had a mean age of 42 ± 11 years, with 57% women and 43% men. Data on demographic characteristics, LBP features, pain-related disability, and quality of life were collected using structured questionnaires and clinical evaluations. Three independent evaluators, blinded to the participants' demographic information and health status, assessed the Modic change parameters, referring to signal alterations in the vertebrae's endplate. The relationship between Modic change parameters and individual health status was assessed using multiple regression analysis after adjustment for age, gender, BMI, smoking and alcohol consumption, disc herniation, facet joint degeneration, and spinal instability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the common Modic change parameters, when Type I Modic changes were observed, we found higher odds of chronic LBP (OR 7.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.1 to 17.0]; p < 0.001) and intermittent LBP (OR 4.9 [95% CI 1.7 to 14.0]; p = 0.003) after adjusting for potential confounders. However, when greater depth and area of Modic changes were observed, we found higher odds of chronic LBP (OR 3.1 [95% CI 1.3 to 7.3]; p = 0.01 and OR 1.3 [95% CI 1.0 to 1.7]; p = 0.03, respectively) but not of intermittent LBP (OR 1.2 [95% CI 0.4 to 4.1]; p = 0.72 and OR 1.0 [95% CI 0.7 to 1.3]; p = 0.86, respectively). In the chronic LBP subgroup, we found that Type I Modic changes were associated with slightly higher maximum pain intensity (β 1.1 [95% CI 0.4 to 1.7]; p = 0.001), and multiple Modic changes were associated with modestly longer duration of chronic LBP (β 5.1 [95% CI 1.2 to 9.0]; p = 0.01). Increased Modic change depth and area were associated with slightly higher pain intensity in the chronic LBP group but not in the intermittent LBP group. In addition, Type II and single Modic changes were associated with slightly worsened pain-related disability (β 1.1 [95% CI 0.1 to 2.0]; p = 0.03 and β 1.5 [95% CI 0.6 to 2.4]; p = 0.001, respectively). The presence of Modic changes was also associated with slightly poorer quality of life, particularly in terms of physical health.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Modic changes were found to be associated with higher odds of LBP, greater pain intensity, worsened pain-related disability, and reduced quality of life. The Type I and larger Modic changes were associated with slightly higher intensity of chronic LBP and slightly reduced physical function. Our study associated Modic changes with these findings, but it was not designed to demonstrate a causal relationship. Future studies will need to explore the causal relationship between Modic changes and health conditions, as well as whether targeting Modic changes could offer a potential approach to alleviating LBP.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, prognostic study.</p>","PeriodicalId":10404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000003565","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Low back pain (LBP) is a common health problem and a major contributor to disability. Modic changes, or vertebral marrow changes visible on MRI, are frequently observed in individuals with LBP. However, there is inconsistent evidence assessing the relationship between Modic changes and LBP, pain-related disability, and quality of life.

Questions/purposes: (1) Are Modic change parameters, including their type, number, and extent, positively associated with the characteristics of LBP, particularly when classified into intermittent LBP and chronic LBP? (2) Are Modic change parameters associated with participant-reported longer duration and higher intensity of LBP? (3) Are Modic change parameters associated with worsened pain-related disability and poorer quality of life?

Methods: This study was a Phase III, single-center, cross-sectional analysis drawing its data from the ongoing Berlin Back Study (research unit FOR5177). A total of 1218 participants who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were recruited between January 2022 and January 2024. Of these, 18% (217 of 1218) were excluded because of the lack of results from orthopaedic clinical examination and MRI evaluation. After clinical examination and completion of questionnaires, another 24% (289 of 1218) were excluded because of pain in other locations or pain experienced in the past, leaving 58% (712 of 1218) of participants in our study. The individuals included in this study had a mean age of 42 ± 11 years, with 57% women and 43% men. Data on demographic characteristics, LBP features, pain-related disability, and quality of life were collected using structured questionnaires and clinical evaluations. Three independent evaluators, blinded to the participants' demographic information and health status, assessed the Modic change parameters, referring to signal alterations in the vertebrae's endplate. The relationship between Modic change parameters and individual health status was assessed using multiple regression analysis after adjustment for age, gender, BMI, smoking and alcohol consumption, disc herniation, facet joint degeneration, and spinal instability.

Results: Among the common Modic change parameters, when Type I Modic changes were observed, we found higher odds of chronic LBP (OR 7.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.1 to 17.0]; p < 0.001) and intermittent LBP (OR 4.9 [95% CI 1.7 to 14.0]; p = 0.003) after adjusting for potential confounders. However, when greater depth and area of Modic changes were observed, we found higher odds of chronic LBP (OR 3.1 [95% CI 1.3 to 7.3]; p = 0.01 and OR 1.3 [95% CI 1.0 to 1.7]; p = 0.03, respectively) but not of intermittent LBP (OR 1.2 [95% CI 0.4 to 4.1]; p = 0.72 and OR 1.0 [95% CI 0.7 to 1.3]; p = 0.86, respectively). In the chronic LBP subgroup, we found that Type I Modic changes were associated with slightly higher maximum pain intensity (β 1.1 [95% CI 0.4 to 1.7]; p = 0.001), and multiple Modic changes were associated with modestly longer duration of chronic LBP (β 5.1 [95% CI 1.2 to 9.0]; p = 0.01). Increased Modic change depth and area were associated with slightly higher pain intensity in the chronic LBP group but not in the intermittent LBP group. In addition, Type II and single Modic changes were associated with slightly worsened pain-related disability (β 1.1 [95% CI 0.1 to 2.0]; p = 0.03 and β 1.5 [95% CI 0.6 to 2.4]; p = 0.001, respectively). The presence of Modic changes was also associated with slightly poorer quality of life, particularly in terms of physical health.

Conclusion: Modic changes were found to be associated with higher odds of LBP, greater pain intensity, worsened pain-related disability, and reduced quality of life. The Type I and larger Modic changes were associated with slightly higher intensity of chronic LBP and slightly reduced physical function. Our study associated Modic changes with these findings, but it was not designed to demonstrate a causal relationship. Future studies will need to explore the causal relationship between Modic changes and health conditions, as well as whether targeting Modic changes could offer a potential approach to alleviating LBP.

Level of evidence: Level III, prognostic study.

一项横断面研究表明,轻度改变与腰痛患者疼痛强度增加、残疾加重和生活质量下降有关。
背景:腰痛(LBP)是一种常见的健康问题,也是导致残疾的主要原因。在腰痛患者中经常观察到轻微改变或MRI可见的椎髓改变。然而,评估Modic变化与LBP、疼痛相关残疾和生活质量之间关系的证据并不一致。问题/目的:(1)Modic change parameters,包括其类型、数量和程度,是否与LBP的特征呈正相关,特别是当分为间歇性LBP和慢性LBP时?(2) Modic变化参数是否与参与者报告的LBP持续时间更长和强度更高有关?(3) Modic改变参数是否与疼痛相关残疾恶化和生活质量下降相关?方法:本研究是一项III期、单中心、横断面分析,数据来自正在进行的柏林背部研究(研究单位FOR5177)。在2022年1月至2024年1月期间,总共招募了1218名符合纳入和排除标准的参与者。其中,18%(1218例中的217例)因缺乏骨科临床检查和MRI评估结果而被排除。在临床检查和完成问卷后,另外24%(1218人中的289人)因其他部位疼痛或过去经历过疼痛而被排除,剩下58%(1218人中的712人)的参与者留在我们的研究中。本研究纳入的个体平均年龄为42±11岁,其中57%为女性,43%为男性。通过结构化问卷调查和临床评估收集了人口统计学特征、腰痛特征、疼痛相关残疾和生活质量的数据。三名独立的评估者,不知道参与者的人口统计信息和健康状况,评估Modic变化参数,指的是椎体终板的信号改变。在调整年龄、性别、BMI、吸烟和饮酒、椎间盘突出、小关节退变和脊柱不稳定等因素后,采用多元回归分析评估Modic变化参数与个体健康状况的关系。结果:在常见的Modic改变参数中,当观察到I型Modic改变时,我们发现慢性腰痛的几率更高(OR 7.3[95%可信区间(CI) 3.1至17.0];p < 0.001)和间歇性腰痛(OR 4.9 [95% CI 1.7 ~ 14.0];P = 0.003)。然而,当观察到更大的深度和面积的Modic变化时,我们发现慢性腰痛的几率更高(OR 3.1 [95% CI 1.3至7.3];p = 0.01, OR为1.3 [95% CI 1.0 ~ 1.7];p = 0.03),但间歇性腰痛不存在(OR为1.2 [95% CI为0.4 ~ 4.1];p = 0.72, OR 1.0 [95% CI 0.7 ~ 1.3];P = 0.86)。在慢性腰痛亚组中,我们发现I型Modic变化与最大疼痛强度略高相关(β 1.1 [95% CI 0.4至1.7];p = 0.001),多重Modic变化与慢性腰痛持续时间较长相关(β 5.1 [95% CI 1.2 - 9.0];P = 0.01)。慢性LBP组的Modic变化深度和面积增加与疼痛强度升高有关,而间歇性LBP组则没有。此外,II型和单一Modic变化与疼痛相关功能障碍轻微恶化相关(β 1.1 [95% CI 0.1至2.0];p = 0.03, β = 1.5 [95% CI 0.6 ~ 2.4];P = 0.001)。Modic变化的存在也与稍差的生活质量有关,特别是在身体健康方面。结论:轻度改变与腰痛发生率增高、疼痛强度增大、疼痛相关残疾恶化和生活质量下降有关。I型和更大的Modic变化与慢性腰痛强度略高和身体功能略有下降相关。我们的研究将Modic变化与这些发现联系起来,但并不是为了证明两者之间存在因果关系。未来的研究将需要探索Modic变化与健康状况之间的因果关系,以及针对Modic变化是否可以提供缓解LBP的潜在方法。证据等级:III级,预后研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
11.90%
发文量
722
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® is a leading peer-reviewed journal devoted to the dissemination of new and important orthopaedic knowledge. CORR® brings readers the latest clinical and basic research, along with columns, commentaries, and interviews with authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信