Assessment of CDKN2A homozygous and heterozygous deletions in gliomas across multiple detection platforms.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Hainan Li, Ningning Luo, Chongzhu Fan, Tiantian Han, Xuemin Wei, Xing Zhang, Lijun Dai, Lei Ye, Dongsheng Chen, Linbo Cai, Zhi Li
{"title":"Assessment of CDKN2A homozygous and heterozygous deletions in gliomas across multiple detection platforms.","authors":"Hainan Li, Ningning Luo, Chongzhu Fan, Tiantian Han, Xuemin Wei, Xing Zhang, Lijun Dai, Lei Ye, Dongsheng Chen, Linbo Cai, Zhi Li","doi":"10.1186/s12885-025-14266-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurately identification of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A) status is of paramount important, as it has been reported as an unfavorable prognostic biomarker in diffuse gliomas, both IDH-mutant and IDH-wild type. Various methods are available for identifying CDKN2A deletion, with fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) being the most used. However, there is currently no established threshold for identifying CDKN2A homozygous and heterozygous deletions using FISH. Herein, we retrospectively collected formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples from 100 patients with diffuse gliomas, and DNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS), FISH, immunohistochemistry (IHC)-p16, and IHC-methylthioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP) were used to assess the CDKN2A status. The correlations and consistency of CDKN2A status identification across different platforms were compared, and inconsistencies and potential reasons were analyzed.. Our findings revealed a relatively high accuracy between FISH- and NGS-assessment results for CDKN2A deletion status, with an AUC value 0.937 for assessing homozygous deletion and an AUC value of 0.980 for assessment deletion overall. However, each detection method has its own advantages and limitations. Therefore, a precise detection scheme is crucial for accurately assessing of CDKN2A deletion status. Finally, we analyzed the clinical significance of CDKN2A status. In conclusion, our study utilized four platforms to comprehensively assess the status of CDKN2A in gliomas and evaluated the performance of each platform. We established cutoff values of FISH to confirm CDKN2A status. Our findings propose methodological guidance for detection of CDKN2A deletion status in different scenarios and provide valuable insights and references for different clinical methodologies used to detect and determine CDKN2A status.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"25 1","pages":"1007"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12143045/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-14266-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurately identification of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A) status is of paramount important, as it has been reported as an unfavorable prognostic biomarker in diffuse gliomas, both IDH-mutant and IDH-wild type. Various methods are available for identifying CDKN2A deletion, with fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) being the most used. However, there is currently no established threshold for identifying CDKN2A homozygous and heterozygous deletions using FISH. Herein, we retrospectively collected formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples from 100 patients with diffuse gliomas, and DNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS), FISH, immunohistochemistry (IHC)-p16, and IHC-methylthioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP) were used to assess the CDKN2A status. The correlations and consistency of CDKN2A status identification across different platforms were compared, and inconsistencies and potential reasons were analyzed.. Our findings revealed a relatively high accuracy between FISH- and NGS-assessment results for CDKN2A deletion status, with an AUC value 0.937 for assessing homozygous deletion and an AUC value of 0.980 for assessment deletion overall. However, each detection method has its own advantages and limitations. Therefore, a precise detection scheme is crucial for accurately assessing of CDKN2A deletion status. Finally, we analyzed the clinical significance of CDKN2A status. In conclusion, our study utilized four platforms to comprehensively assess the status of CDKN2A in gliomas and evaluated the performance of each platform. We established cutoff values of FISH to confirm CDKN2A status. Our findings propose methodological guidance for detection of CDKN2A deletion status in different scenarios and provide valuable insights and references for different clinical methodologies used to detect and determine CDKN2A status.

通过多种检测平台评估胶质瘤中CDKN2A纯合和杂合缺失。
细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶抑制剂2A (CDKN2A)状态的准确鉴定至关重要,因为它已被报道为弥漫性胶质瘤(idh突变型和idh野生型)的不利预后生物标志物。有多种方法可用于鉴定CDKN2A缺失,荧光原位杂交(FISH)是最常用的方法。然而,目前还没有使用FISH识别CDKN2A纯合和杂合缺失的确定阈值。在此,我们回顾性地收集了100例弥漫性胶质瘤患者的福尔马林固定石蜡包埋组织样本,并使用基于dna的下一代测序(NGS)、FISH、免疫组织化学(IHC)-p16和IHC-甲基硫代腺苷磷酸化酶(MTAP)来评估CDKN2A的状态。比较不同平台间CDKN2A状态识别的相关性和一致性,分析不一致性及其潜在原因。我们的研究结果显示,FISH-和ngs -评估CDKN2A缺失状态的结果具有相对较高的准确性,评估纯合缺失的AUC值为0.937,评估整体缺失的AUC值为0.980。然而,每种检测方法都有自己的优点和局限性。因此,精确的检测方案对于准确评估CDKN2A缺失状态至关重要。最后我们分析了CDKN2A状态的临床意义。综上所述,我们的研究使用了四个平台来综合评估CDKN2A在胶质瘤中的状态,并评估了每个平台的性能。我们建立了FISH的截止值来确认CDKN2A的状态。我们的研究结果为不同情况下CDKN2A缺失状态的检测提供了方法学指导,并为用于检测和确定CDKN2A状态的不同临床方法提供了有价值的见解和参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Cancer
BMC Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1204
审稿时长
6.8 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The journal welcomes submissions concerning molecular and cellular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信