Supervised and unsupervised learning for lung perfusion data segmentation in electrical impedance tomography.

IF 1.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Marcus Victor, Arthur Ribeiro, Monica Matsumoto, Yi Xin, Alice Nova, Timothy Gaulton, Maurizio Cereda
{"title":"Supervised and unsupervised learning for lung perfusion data segmentation in electrical impedance tomography.","authors":"Marcus Victor, Arthur Ribeiro, Monica Matsumoto, Yi Xin, Alice Nova, Timothy Gaulton, Maurizio Cereda","doi":"10.1088/2057-1976/ade158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective</i>: Effective lung gas exchange relies on the balance between alveolar ventilation and perfusion, which can be disrupted in mechanically ventilated patients. Lung perfusion assessment using electrical impedance tomography (EIT) typically involves a sudden injection of a hypertonic saline solution. The large field of view provided by EIT often results in ambivalent behavior of many voxel waveforms following an indicator injection, where some exhibit indicator kinetics solely through the lungs (pulmonary), while others show passage through both the heart and lungs (hybrid). Consequently, a segmentation algorithm is essential for accurate perfusion evaluation.<i>Approach</i>: Sixteen pigs (29-35 kg) were mechanically ventilated and received a 10 ml bolus of 7.5% NaCl solution to assess lung perfusion during a healthy stage and, later, in an injured stage after receiving 3.5 ml kg<sup>-1</sup>of HCl to induce acute lung injury. Supervised (Bagged Trees, Neural Networks, and Support Vector Machine) and unsupervised (K-means, Hierarchical, and Principal Component Analysis) learning methods were employed using 115 saline injections comprising voxel waveforms to label voxels as either hybrid or pulmonary. All segmentation methods were compared to a ground-truth mask manually drawn. A training dataset (81 injections) was used to train and cross-validate (five-fold) the supervised methods using previously extracted features. The test dataset (34 injections) was used to test both supervised and unsupervised learning algorithms.<i>Main Results</i>: A Principal Component Analysis (unsupervised learning) method exhibited the best overall performance, achieving 83% sensitivity, 92% specificity, 89% accuracy, and 84% dice similarity coefficient. No significant difference in performance was observed between healthy and injured subsets. Unsupervised methods consistently yielded more physiologically plausible and less scattered regions of interest.<i>Significance</i>: Accurate voxel labeling is crucial for lung perfusion assessment, as it enables discrimination of the indicator passage through the heart and lungs, thereby improving the estimation of regional pulmonary blood flow.</p>","PeriodicalId":8896,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/ade158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Effective lung gas exchange relies on the balance between alveolar ventilation and perfusion, which can be disrupted in mechanically ventilated patients. Lung perfusion assessment using electrical impedance tomography (EIT) typically involves a sudden injection of a hypertonic saline solution. The large field of view provided by EIT often results in ambivalent behavior of many voxel waveforms following an indicator injection, where some exhibit indicator kinetics solely through the lungs (pulmonary), while others show passage through both the heart and lungs (hybrid). Consequently, a segmentation algorithm is essential for accurate perfusion evaluation.Approach: Sixteen pigs (29-35 kg) were mechanically ventilated and received a 10 ml bolus of 7.5% NaCl solution to assess lung perfusion during a healthy stage and, later, in an injured stage after receiving 3.5 ml kg-1of HCl to induce acute lung injury. Supervised (Bagged Trees, Neural Networks, and Support Vector Machine) and unsupervised (K-means, Hierarchical, and Principal Component Analysis) learning methods were employed using 115 saline injections comprising voxel waveforms to label voxels as either hybrid or pulmonary. All segmentation methods were compared to a ground-truth mask manually drawn. A training dataset (81 injections) was used to train and cross-validate (five-fold) the supervised methods using previously extracted features. The test dataset (34 injections) was used to test both supervised and unsupervised learning algorithms.Main Results: A Principal Component Analysis (unsupervised learning) method exhibited the best overall performance, achieving 83% sensitivity, 92% specificity, 89% accuracy, and 84% dice similarity coefficient. No significant difference in performance was observed between healthy and injured subsets. Unsupervised methods consistently yielded more physiologically plausible and less scattered regions of interest.Significance: Accurate voxel labeling is crucial for lung perfusion assessment, as it enables discrimination of the indicator passage through the heart and lungs, thereby improving the estimation of regional pulmonary blood flow.

电阻抗断层扫描中肺灌注数据分割的监督学习和无监督学习。
目的:有效的肺气体交换依赖于肺泡通气和灌注之间的平衡,而机械通气患者的这种平衡可能被破坏。肺灌注评估使用电阻抗断层扫描(EIT)通常涉及突然注射高渗盐水溶液。EIT提供的大视场通常导致指示剂注射后许多体素波形的矛盾行为,其中一些显示指示剂动力学仅通过肺部(肺),而另一些显示通过心脏和肺部(混合)。因此,分割算法对于准确的灌注评估至关重要。方法:对16头猪(29-35 kg)进行机械通气,并在健康期和随后在损伤期接受3.5 mL/kg HCl诱导急性肺损伤后,给予10 mL 7.5% NaCl溶液,以评估肺灌注。采用有监督(袋装树、神经网络和支持向量机)和无监督(K-means、分层和主成分分析)学习方法,使用115个含体素波形的生理盐水注射,将体素标记为混合体素或肺体素。将所有分割方法与人工绘制的真值掩模进行比较。使用训练数据集(81次注射)来训练和交叉验证(五倍)使用先前提取的特征的监督方法。测试数据集(34次注射)用于测试有监督和无监督学习算法。主要结果:主成分分析(无监督学习)方法表现出最佳的整体性能,达到83%的灵敏度,92%的特异性,89%的准确率和84%的骰子相似系数。在健康亚群和受伤亚群之间没有观察到显著的性能差异。无监督的方法始终产生更多的生理上似是而非的兴趣区域。意义:准确的体素标记对于肺灌注评估至关重要,因为它可以区分指标通过心脏和肺部,从而提高对肺局部血流的估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
153
期刊介绍: BPEX is an inclusive, international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to publishing new research on any application of physics and/or engineering in medicine and/or biology. Characterized by a broad geographical coverage and a fast-track peer-review process, relevant topics include all aspects of biophysics, medical physics and biomedical engineering. Papers that are almost entirely clinical or biological in their focus are not suitable. The journal has an emphasis on publishing interdisciplinary work and bringing research fields together, encompassing experimental, theoretical and computational work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信