Delphi study on first-time parents’ perceptions of professional support in the early postpartum period

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Elisabeth Schobinger , Antje Horsch , Anne-Sylvie Ramelet
{"title":"Delphi study on first-time parents’ perceptions of professional support in the early postpartum period","authors":"Elisabeth Schobinger ,&nbsp;Antje Horsch ,&nbsp;Anne-Sylvie Ramelet","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2025.104481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Problem and background</h3><div>Professional support during the early postpartum period is crucial for first-time parents, yet little is known about which specific professional support behaviours parents consider most important.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To determine, by consensus, which professional support behaviours are important for first-time parents during the early postpartum period and whether there are differences between mothers and fathers.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An observational modified two-round Delphi was conducted with 90 first-time parents in the postpartum ward of two Swiss hospitals from July to December 2022. In both rounds, participants rated the importance of each item on a Likert response scale. Consensus was defined as items rated &gt; 4 and a coefficient of variation of ≤25 %. Descriptive statistics and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to analyse the data, and thematic analysis for the new items proposed in Round 1.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Response rate was 86.6 % in Round 1 (<em>n</em> = 78), and 70 % in Round 2 (<em>n</em> = 63). Consensus was reached on 64 items (87.7 %) in Round 1 and 65 (78.3 %) in Round 2. Participants prioritised professional support behaviours promoting <em>partnerships with care providers</em> and <em>transition into the new parenting role</em>. Differences between mothers (<em>n</em> = 38) and fathers (<em>n</em> = 27) emerged for two items: “Suggesting different alternatives regarding infant care, breastfeeding position,” and “having a gentle, caring attitude”, with mothers rating them higher.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusion</h3><div>First-time parents identified key professional support behaviours for postpartum care emphasising the importance of personalised, non-judgmental support. Minor differences between mothers and fathers suggest both perspectives should be considered when providing support.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":"148 ","pages":"Article 104481"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613825001998","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Problem and background

Professional support during the early postpartum period is crucial for first-time parents, yet little is known about which specific professional support behaviours parents consider most important.

Objective

To determine, by consensus, which professional support behaviours are important for first-time parents during the early postpartum period and whether there are differences between mothers and fathers.

Methods

An observational modified two-round Delphi was conducted with 90 first-time parents in the postpartum ward of two Swiss hospitals from July to December 2022. In both rounds, participants rated the importance of each item on a Likert response scale. Consensus was defined as items rated > 4 and a coefficient of variation of ≤25 %. Descriptive statistics and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to analyse the data, and thematic analysis for the new items proposed in Round 1.

Findings

Response rate was 86.6 % in Round 1 (n = 78), and 70 % in Round 2 (n = 63). Consensus was reached on 64 items (87.7 %) in Round 1 and 65 (78.3 %) in Round 2. Participants prioritised professional support behaviours promoting partnerships with care providers and transition into the new parenting role. Differences between mothers (n = 38) and fathers (n = 27) emerged for two items: “Suggesting different alternatives regarding infant care, breastfeeding position,” and “having a gentle, caring attitude”, with mothers rating them higher.

Discussion and conclusion

First-time parents identified key professional support behaviours for postpartum care emphasising the importance of personalised, non-judgmental support. Minor differences between mothers and fathers suggest both perspectives should be considered when providing support.
产后早期初为父母者对专业支持认知的德尔菲研究
问题和背景产后早期的专业支持对初为父母的人来说是至关重要的,但很少有人知道父母认为哪种具体的专业支持行为最重要。目的探讨专业支持行为对产后早期初为人父人母的重要性,以及两者之间是否存在差异。方法对瑞士两家医院于2022年7月至12月在产后病房就诊的90名首次产妇进行观察性修正两轮德尔菲法。在这两轮中,参与者用李克特反应量表对每个项目的重要性进行打分。共识被定义为评级为>;4,变异系数≤25%。采用描述性统计和Wilcoxon秩和检验对数据进行分析,并对第一轮提出的新项目进行专题分析。结果:第1轮有效率为86.6% (n = 78),第2轮有效率为70% (n = 63)。在第一轮谈判中,双方分别就64项(87.7%)和65项(78.3%)达成共识。参与者优先考虑专业支持行为,促进与护理提供者的伙伴关系,并过渡到新的育儿角色。母亲(n = 38)和父亲(n = 27)在两个项目上存在差异:“在婴儿护理、母乳喂养姿势方面提出不同的选择”和“拥有温柔、关怀的态度”,母亲对这两个项目的评价更高。讨论与结论:首次为人父母者确定了产后护理的关键专业支持行为,强调了个性化、非评判性支持的重要性。母亲和父亲之间的微小差异表明,在提供支持时应考虑两种观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Midwifery
Midwifery 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
221
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Midwifery publishes the latest peer reviewed international research to inform the safety, quality, outcomes and experiences of pregnancy, birth and maternity care for childbearing women, their babies and families. The journal’s publications support midwives and maternity care providers to explore and develop their knowledge, skills and attitudes informed by best available evidence. Midwifery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and discussion of advances in evidence, controversies and current research, and promotes continuing education through publication of systematic and other scholarly reviews and updates. Midwifery articles cover the cultural, clinical, psycho-social, sociological, epidemiological, education, managerial, workforce, organizational and technological areas of practice in preconception, maternal and infant care. The journal welcomes the highest quality scholarly research that employs rigorous methodology. Midwifery is a leading international journal in midwifery and maternal health with a current impact factor of 1.861 (© Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports 2016) and employs a double-blind peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信