Strategies to overcome barriers to LCA adoption in additive manufacturing

IF 10.1 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES
Jocelyn Ke Yin Lee , Hamed Gholami , Anas A. Salameh , Angappa Gunasekaran
{"title":"Strategies to overcome barriers to LCA adoption in additive manufacturing","authors":"Jocelyn Ke Yin Lee ,&nbsp;Hamed Gholami ,&nbsp;Anas A. Salameh ,&nbsp;Angappa Gunasekaran","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As additive manufacturing advances within Industry 4.0, concerns over its environmental impact have motivated this study to investigate the application of life cycle assessment (LCA) in additive manufacturing operations. While LCA offers significant benefits, its adoption is hindered by multiple barriers; however, existing research lacks a thorough discussion and analysis of these challenges and effective strategies to overcome them, highlighting a critical gap in the literature. Thus, the primary objective of this study is to scrutinize strategies for overcoming key barriers to LCA adoption in additive manufacturing within developed economies. To achieve this, a multi-method approach was employed, consisting of four sequential phases incorporating a comprehensive literature review and analysis techniques—analytical hierarchy process to examine barriers and the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution to analyze strategies in a fuzzy environment. The research findings revealed twenty-seven barriers, systematically analyzed and ranked into five main categories in descending order: support barriers, data-related barriers, resource barriers, methodology barriers, and complexity barriers. Among the seventeen set strategic solutions, ‘commitment and support from top management’ emerged as the most prominent, followed by ‘research study on LCA training and manuals’ and ‘pre-processing of information for LCA study’. Hence, the study bridges the identified research gap by providing actionable insights that empower policymakers and industry leaders to develop targeted mitigation strategies and enhance the sustainability performance of additive manufacturing operations. It can serve as an invaluable reference, as it is the first to explore this topic.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"83 ","pages":"Article 102980"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25001708","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As additive manufacturing advances within Industry 4.0, concerns over its environmental impact have motivated this study to investigate the application of life cycle assessment (LCA) in additive manufacturing operations. While LCA offers significant benefits, its adoption is hindered by multiple barriers; however, existing research lacks a thorough discussion and analysis of these challenges and effective strategies to overcome them, highlighting a critical gap in the literature. Thus, the primary objective of this study is to scrutinize strategies for overcoming key barriers to LCA adoption in additive manufacturing within developed economies. To achieve this, a multi-method approach was employed, consisting of four sequential phases incorporating a comprehensive literature review and analysis techniques—analytical hierarchy process to examine barriers and the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution to analyze strategies in a fuzzy environment. The research findings revealed twenty-seven barriers, systematically analyzed and ranked into five main categories in descending order: support barriers, data-related barriers, resource barriers, methodology barriers, and complexity barriers. Among the seventeen set strategic solutions, ‘commitment and support from top management’ emerged as the most prominent, followed by ‘research study on LCA training and manuals’ and ‘pre-processing of information for LCA study’. Hence, the study bridges the identified research gap by providing actionable insights that empower policymakers and industry leaders to develop targeted mitigation strategies and enhance the sustainability performance of additive manufacturing operations. It can serve as an invaluable reference, as it is the first to explore this topic.
在增材制造中克服LCA采用障碍的策略
随着增材制造在工业4.0中的发展,对其环境影响的担忧促使本研究调查了生命周期评估(LCA)在增材制造业务中的应用。虽然LCA提供了巨大的好处,但它的采用受到多种障碍的阻碍;然而,现有的研究缺乏对这些挑战的深入讨论和分析以及克服这些挑战的有效策略,这突出了文献中的一个关键空白。因此,本研究的主要目的是仔细研究在发达经济体中克服增材制造采用LCA的主要障碍的策略。为了实现这一目标,采用了一种多方法方法,包括四个连续阶段,结合全面的文献综述和分析技术-分析层次分析法来检查障碍,以及通过与理想解的相似性来分析模糊环境中的策略的顺序偏好技术。研究结果揭示了27个障碍,系统地分析并按降序将其分为五大类:支持障碍、数据相关障碍、资源障碍、方法障碍和复杂性障碍。在17套战略解决方案中,“最高管理层的承诺和支持”是最突出的,其次是“LCA培训和手册的研究”和“LCA研究的信息预处理”。因此,该研究通过提供可操作的见解,使政策制定者和行业领导者能够制定有针对性的缓解战略,并提高增材制造业务的可持续性绩效,弥合了已确定的研究差距。它可以作为一个宝贵的参考,因为它是第一个探讨这个主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
14.10%
发文量
316
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信