The digital mundane and the experiential production of public space

Robert Lundberg
{"title":"The digital mundane and the experiential production of public space","authors":"Robert Lundberg","doi":"10.1016/j.diggeo.2025.100125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The role that our engagements with digital technology play in producing urban public space are often and easily taken for granted. Seeking to remedy this, there has been a groundswell of scholarship in digital geography that explores how various digital technologies are experienced as part of everyday life in public space. In this article I extend this scholarship by arguing that digital technology is not only an important experiential phenomenon, but that, through our mundane engagements, it also configures together with the urban bodies, mass, and matter to produce public space. To account for the spatially productive role of digital technology I develop an understanding of public space as contingent and dynamic, and show how this allows us to understand space as <em>becoming</em> public when it is experienced as such, by locating the everyday material and affective engagements with digital technology that contribute to those experiences. This orientation towards everyday life offers an important counterpoint to narratives that relate the production of public space to top-down engagements with digital technologies, as in smart and platform cities. It also contributes to the critical evaluation of public space by showing how digital technology is part of the ongoing configuration of that space, through the everyday life that takes place there.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100377,"journal":{"name":"Digital Geography and Society","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Geography and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666378325000145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The role that our engagements with digital technology play in producing urban public space are often and easily taken for granted. Seeking to remedy this, there has been a groundswell of scholarship in digital geography that explores how various digital technologies are experienced as part of everyday life in public space. In this article I extend this scholarship by arguing that digital technology is not only an important experiential phenomenon, but that, through our mundane engagements, it also configures together with the urban bodies, mass, and matter to produce public space. To account for the spatially productive role of digital technology I develop an understanding of public space as contingent and dynamic, and show how this allows us to understand space as becoming public when it is experienced as such, by locating the everyday material and affective engagements with digital technology that contribute to those experiences. This orientation towards everyday life offers an important counterpoint to narratives that relate the production of public space to top-down engagements with digital technologies, as in smart and platform cities. It also contributes to the critical evaluation of public space by showing how digital technology is part of the ongoing configuration of that space, through the everyday life that takes place there.
数字世俗和公共空间的体验生产
我们与数字技术的接触在创造城市公共空间中所起的作用往往很容易被视为理所当然。为了解决这一问题,数字地理学领域出现了一股学术热潮,探索各种数字技术如何成为公共空间日常生活的一部分。在这篇文章中,我通过论证数字技术不仅是一种重要的体验现象,而且通过我们的世俗参与,它还与城市主体、大众和物质一起配置,以产生公共空间,从而扩展了这一学术研究。为了解释数字技术在空间上的生产性作用,我将公共空间理解为偶然的和动态的,并通过定位有助于这些体验的日常材料和与数字技术的情感接触,展示这如何使我们理解空间在经历这种体验时变得公共。这种对日常生活的取向为公共空间的生产与自上而下的数字技术(如智能和平台城市)联系起来的叙述提供了一个重要的对比。它还通过展示数字技术如何成为公共空间持续配置的一部分,通过在那里发生的日常生活,有助于对公共空间进行批判性评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信