Comparing self-construal scales: Cultural implications for the United States, East Asia, Southeast Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East

Q2 Psychology
Jon Lim, Christine Ma-Kellams
{"title":"Comparing self-construal scales: Cultural implications for the United States, East Asia, Southeast Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East","authors":"Jon Lim,&nbsp;Christine Ma-Kellams","doi":"10.1016/j.metip.2025.100189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Contemporary self-construal research indicates that people define themselves either as independent or interdependent. We review self-construal scales across the United States, East Asia, Southeast Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East to compare/contrast their operationalizations of interdependence (or independence). Taken together, this body of research suggests that, consistent with findings on American and East Asian selves, Southeast Asian cultures also exhibit interdependent self-construal. Latin Americans, however, display independent self-construal despite their long-standing characterization as a collectivist culture, while Arabs display both independence and interdependence. Future directions—including the improved validity of multidimensional measures of the self over dichotomous scales, cultural differences on distinctiveness, research on bicultural individuals, within-cultural comparisons, and the role of polyculturalism—are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93338,"journal":{"name":"Methods in Psychology (Online)","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100189"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods in Psychology (Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590260125000153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Contemporary self-construal research indicates that people define themselves either as independent or interdependent. We review self-construal scales across the United States, East Asia, Southeast Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East to compare/contrast their operationalizations of interdependence (or independence). Taken together, this body of research suggests that, consistent with findings on American and East Asian selves, Southeast Asian cultures also exhibit interdependent self-construal. Latin Americans, however, display independent self-construal despite their long-standing characterization as a collectivist culture, while Arabs display both independence and interdependence. Future directions—including the improved validity of multidimensional measures of the self over dichotomous scales, cultural differences on distinctiveness, research on bicultural individuals, within-cultural comparisons, and the role of polyculturalism—are discussed.
比较自我解释的尺度:美国、东亚、东南亚、拉丁美洲和中东的文化影响
当代的自我建构研究表明,人们要么将自己定义为独立的,要么是相互依存的。我们回顾了美国、东亚、东南亚、拉丁美洲和中东的自我解释量表,以比较/对比他们相互依存(或独立)的运作方式。综上所述,这些研究表明,与对美国和东亚自我的研究结果一致,东南亚文化也表现出相互依存的自我建构。然而,拉丁美洲人表现出独立的自我解释,尽管他们长期被定性为集体主义文化,而阿拉伯人则表现出独立和相互依存。未来的研究方向,包括提高自我的多维度测量的有效性,对独特性的文化差异,双文化个体的研究,文化内比较,以及多元文化主义的作用,进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Methods in Psychology (Online)
Methods in Psychology (Online) Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信