Capillary refill time as an additional triage criterion to decide ICU admission of deteriorating obstetric patients

IF 8.8 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Enrique Monares Zepeda, Sebastian Morales, Marco Antonio Heras Garate, Annanda Márquez, Jesús Carlos Briones Garduño, Ricardo Castro, Gustavo Ospina-Tascón, Glenn Hernández, Eduardo Kattan
{"title":"Capillary refill time as an additional triage criterion to decide ICU admission of deteriorating obstetric patients","authors":"Enrique Monares Zepeda, Sebastian Morales, Marco Antonio Heras Garate, Annanda Márquez, Jesús Carlos Briones Garduño, Ricardo Castro, Gustavo Ospina-Tascón, Glenn Hernández, Eduardo Kattan","doi":"10.1186/s13054-025-05404-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Reduction of maternal mortality remains a global public health priority, of particular interest in the developing world [1]. Prompt detection and treatment of physiological derangements are critical to avoid adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with obstetric emergencies, such as hemorrhage, hypertensive disorders, and sepsis. Indeed, the implementation of rapid response teams has been shown to improve outcomes in the obstetric population [2]. Simple and cost-effective monitoring tools for triage are essential not only for the early identification of patients but also for facilitating the initiation of supportive treatment and optimization of resource allocation [3]. However, such tools are currently lacking for this population.</p><p>Capillary refill time (CRT) is a simple diagnostic test that reflects skin perfusion and has been proposed as a marker of tissue hypoperfusion in both shock states and other conditions [4]. It has become a widely used clinical parameter as it is cost-free, universally available, and easily performed at the bedside. Unfortunately, there is a paucity of data regarding the role of CRT in the obstetric triage scenario. This study aimed to evaluate the potential usefulness of CRT as an additional triage criterion to identify the risk of ICU admission among obstetric patients assessed by a rapid response team (RRT) in an obstetric hospital.</p><p>We conducted a prospective observational study at a tertiary obstetric hospital in Ciudad de México, México. Consecutive patients in the third trimester of pregnancy or early postpartum period in the obstetric ward, for whom the RRT was activated between November 2021 and March 2024, were included. Exclusion criteria comprised patients admitted directly to the ICU from the ED or operating room, as well as pregnant patients who deteriorated in the wards following non-obstetric surgical interventions. We recorded physiological variables and commonly used severity scores, including the MEOWS score, universal vital assessment (UVA), and the obstetrically modified quick SOFA (omqSOFA) score. CRT was measured using a standardized method recommended in the literature, with a cutoff of 3.5 s [4]. The primary outcome of this study was ICU admission. ICU admission was decided on a case-by-case basis by the RRT team leader, considering the clinical context, bed availability, and their clinical gestalt, without predefined admission criteria.</p><p>During the study period, the RRT assessed 1448 obstetric patients hospitalized in the obstetric ward (Supplemental Fig. 1). Among the study population, 891 (61.5%) patients were pregnant, while 557 (38.5%) were in the postpartum period. A total of 110 patients (7.6%) were finally admitted to the ICU. The primary causes for admission were hypertensive disorders (51%), hemorrhage (17%), and septic shock (15%).</p><figure><figcaption><b data-test=\"figure-caption-text\">Fig. 1</b></figcaption><picture><source srcset=\"//media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs13054-025-05404-9/MediaObjects/13054_2025_5404_Fig1_HTML.png?as=webp\" type=\"image/webp\"/><img alt=\"figure 1\" aria-describedby=\"Fig1\" height=\"368\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"//media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs13054-025-05404-9/MediaObjects/13054_2025_5404_Fig1_HTML.png\" width=\"685\"/></picture><p>Impact of integrating capillary refill time into frequently used severity scoring on the relative risk of intensive care unit admission of deteriorating obstetric patients. omqSOFA: obstetrically modified quick sequential organ failure assessment; MEOWS: Modified Early Obstetric Warning System; UVA: universal vital assessment</p><span>Full size image</span><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"16\" role=\"img\" width=\"16\"><use xlink:href=\"#icon-eds-i-chevron-right-small\" xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\"></use></svg></figure><p>Supplemental Table 1 compares the prevalence of baseline physiological derangements between patients admitted to ICU and those who stayed in the wards. At RRT assessment, prolonged CRT was observed in 47.3% of patients admitted to ICU, compared to only 2.5% of those who were not (p &lt; 0.001). Among ICU-admitted patients, those with abnormal CRT at triage required more life support interventions (23% vs 8%, p = 0.039). Furthermore, 56 patients (51%) with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy that required ICU admission had an abnormal CRT at triage.</p><figure><figcaption><b data-test=\"table-caption\">Table 1 Relative risk of deranged physiological variables and their area under curve (AUC) to predict ICU admission</b></figcaption><span>Full size table</span><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"16\" role=\"img\" width=\"16\"><use xlink:href=\"#icon-eds-i-chevron-right-small\" xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\"></use></svg></figure><p>Table 1 shows the univariate relative risk (RR) and the area under receiver operating curve (AUROC) of physiological variables to predict ICU admission, while multivariate analysis of statistically significant variables is shown in Supplemental Table 2. When analyzing their diagnostic characteristics, only an altered CRT and estimated bleeding &gt; 1000 cc had a positive likelihood ratio (LR +) &gt; 10, as shown in Supplemental Table 3. Supplemental Table 4 shows that CRT maintains its overall diagnostic accuracy in both hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and hypotensive syndromes. Supplemental Table 5 shows the diagnostic accuracy of different severity scoring systems to predict ICU admission, along with the impact of incorporating CRT to improve their diagnostic yield. Figure 1 depicts the impact of integrating CRT into the RR of ICU admission for each of these scores.</p><p>Our study showed that no single vital sign at triage had adequate diagnostic accuracy to identify patients requiring ICU admission, besides an altered CRT and an estimated bleeding &gt; 1000 cc. Notably, frequently used scores for obstetric emergencies, such as omqSOFA and MEOWS, did not perform adequately either. These findings align with results from other emergency triage scenarios, where clinical gestalt has been shown to outperform scoring systems [5]. However, integrating CRT with these scores significantly enhanced their predictive accuracy. Consequently, CRT may serve as an early and specific indicator for clinical deterioration.</p><p>Pregnancy is associated with distinct hemodynamic changes. Interestingly, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy—a disease characterized by an altered microcirculation—have been shown to exhibit sublingual microcirculatory derangements, including a decreased percentage of perfused vessels, total capillary density, and functional vessel density, similar to those derangements found in septic shock [6]. In the latter, strong correlations have been established between prolonged CRT and sublingual microcirculatory abnormalities [7]. Thus, CRT could provide valuable insights into the microcirculatory status of the deteriorating obstetric patient. Given its simplicity, reproducibility, and zero cost, CRT has the potential to be seamlessly integrated into routine obstetric care. Nevertheless, further research is needed to validate its utility and optimize its implementation.</p><p>In conclusion, in a cohort of deteriorating obstetric patients in which a rapid response team was activated, an altered CRT was an accurate predictor of ICU admission and enhanced the predictive capacity of commonly used clinical scores used for triage. Bedside evaluation of CRT in obstetric emergencies emerges as a costless, simple and valuable tool for risk stratification. Future studies should further explore the utility and applications of CRT in this context.</p><p>De-identified patient data will be available with publication, upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.</p><dl><dt style=\"min-width:50px;\"><dfn>CRT:</dfn></dt><dd>\n<p>Capillary Refill Time</p>\n</dd><dt style=\"min-width:50px;\"><dfn>ICU:</dfn></dt><dd>\n<p>Intensive Care Unit</p>\n</dd><dt style=\"min-width:50px;\"><dfn>qSOFA:</dfn></dt><dd>\n<p>Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment</p>\n</dd><dt style=\"min-width:50px;\"><dfn>MEOWS:</dfn></dt><dd>\n<p>Modified Early Obstetric Warning Score</p>\n</dd><dt style=\"min-width:50px;\"><dfn>UVA:</dfn></dt><dd>\n<p>Universal Vital Assessment</p>\n</dd><dt style=\"min-width:50px;\"><dfn>ED:</dfn></dt><dd>\n<p>Emergency Department</p>\n</dd><dt style=\"min-width:50px;\"><dfn>RRT:</dfn></dt><dd>\n<p>Rapid Response Team</p>\n</dd><dt style=\"min-width:50px;\"><dfn>omqSOFA:</dfn></dt><dd>\n<p>Obstetrically modified qSOFA</p>\n</dd><dt style=\"min-width:50px;\"><dfn>SD:</dfn></dt><dd>\n<p>Standard Deviation</p>\n</dd><dt style=\"min-width:50px;\"><dfn>RR:</dfn></dt><dd>\n<p>Relative Risks</p>\n</dd><dt style=\"min-width:50px;\"><dfn>OR:</dfn></dt><dd>\n<p>Odds Ratio</p>\n</dd><dt style=\"min-width:50px;\"><dfn>AUC:</dfn></dt><dd>\n<p>Area Under the Curve</p>\n</dd></dl><ol data-track-component=\"outbound reference\" data-track-context=\"references section\"><li data-counter=\"1.\"><p>Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, Tunçalp Ö, Moller A-B, Daniels J, et al. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2:e323–33.</p><p>Article PubMed Google Scholar </p></li><li data-counter=\"2.\"><p>Dalby PL, Gosman G. Crisis teams for obstetric patients. Crit Care Clin. 2018;34:221–38.</p><p>Article PubMed Google Scholar </p></li><li data-counter=\"3.\"><p>Maharaj R, Raffaele I, Wendon J. Rapid response systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2015;19:254.</p><p>Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar </p></li><li data-counter=\"4.\"><p>Hernandez G, Carmona P, Ait-Oufella H. Monitoring capillary refill time in septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2024;50:580–2.</p><p>Article PubMed Google Scholar </p></li><li data-counter=\"5.\"><p>Knack SKS, Scott N, Driver BE, Prekker ME, Black LP, Hopson C, et al. Early physician gestalt versus usual screening tools for the prediction of sepsis in critically Ill emergency patients. Ann Emerg Med. 2024;84:246–58.</p><p>Article PubMed Google Scholar </p></li><li data-counter=\"6.\"><p>Ospina-Tascón GA, Nieto Calvache AJ, Quiñones E, Madriñan HJ, Valencia JD, Bermúdez WF, et al. Microcirculatory blood flow derangements during severe preeclampsia and HELLP syndrome. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2017;10:124–30.</p><p>Article PubMed Google Scholar </p></li><li data-counter=\"7.\"><p>De Backer D, Ricottilli F, Ospina-Tascón GA. Septic shock: a microcirculation disease. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2021;34:85–91.</p><p>Article PubMed Google Scholar </p></li></ol><p>Download references<svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"16\" role=\"img\" width=\"16\"><use xlink:href=\"#icon-eds-i-download-medium\" xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\"></use></svg></p><p>Not applicable.</p><p>This study received no funding.</p><h3>Authors and Affiliations</h3><ol><li><p>Servicio de Ginecología y Obstetricia, Hospital General de México “Dr. Eduardo Liceaga”, Ciudad de Mexico, México</p><p>Enrique Monares Zepeda, Annanda Márquez &amp; Jesús Carlos Briones Garduño</p></li><li><p>The Latin American Intensive Care Network (LIVEN), Santiago, Chile</p><p>Enrique Monares Zepeda, Ricardo Castro, Gustavo Ospina-Tascón, Glenn Hernández &amp; Eduardo Kattan</p></li><li><p>Departamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Avenida Diagonal, Paraguay 362, 6510260, Santiago, Chile</p><p>Sebastian Morales, Ricardo Castro, Glenn Hernández &amp; Eduardo Kattan</p></li><li><p>Hospital Gineco Obstétrico Pediátrico de Nueva Aurora Luz Elena Arismendi, Quito, Ecuador</p><p>Marco Antonio Heras Garate</p></li><li><p>Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia</p><p>Gustavo Ospina-Tascón</p></li><li><p>Translational Research Laboratory in Critical Care Medicine (TransLab-CCM), Universidad Icesi, Cali, Colombia</p><p>Gustavo Ospina-Tascón</p></li></ol><span>Authors</span><ol><li><span>Enrique Monares Zepeda</span>View author publications<p><span>You can also search for this author in</span><span>PubMed<span> </span>Google Scholar</span></p></li><li><span>Sebastian Morales</span>View author publications<p><span>You can also search for this author in</span><span>PubMed<span> </span>Google Scholar</span></p></li><li><span>Marco Antonio Heras Garate</span>View author publications<p><span>You can also search for this author in</span><span>PubMed<span> </span>Google Scholar</span></p></li><li><span>Annanda Márquez</span>View author publications<p><span>You can also search for this author in</span><span>PubMed<span> </span>Google Scholar</span></p></li><li><span>Jesús Carlos Briones Garduño</span>View author publications<p><span>You can also search for this author in</span><span>PubMed<span> </span>Google Scholar</span></p></li><li><span>Ricardo Castro</span>View author publications<p><span>You can also search for this author in</span><span>PubMed<span> </span>Google Scholar</span></p></li><li><span>Gustavo Ospina-Tascón</span>View author publications<p><span>You can also search for this author in</span><span>PubMed<span> </span>Google Scholar</span></p></li><li><span>Glenn Hernández</span>View author publications<p><span>You can also search for this author in</span><span>PubMed<span> </span>Google Scholar</span></p></li><li><span>Eduardo Kattan</span>View author publications<p><span>You can also search for this author in</span><span>PubMed<span> </span>Google Scholar</span></p></li></ol><h3>Contributions</h3><p>EMZ and EK conceived and designed the study. EMZ, MAHG, AM, JCBG, collected and verified the data. SM and EK did the statistical analysis. EMZ, MAHG, SM, GH and EK interpreted the data. EMZ, SM, RC, GOT, GH and EK drafted the initial manuscript. All authors critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content and agreed to submit the final version for publication.</p><h3>Corresponding author</h3><p>Correspondence to Eduardo Kattan.</p><h3>Ethics approval and consent to participate</h3>\n<p>This study was conducted in line with the principles of the Delcaration of Helsinki. The Institutional Ethical Review Board of the site approved this study (project ID DECS/JPO-CT-1140-2021) and informed consent was waived due to the observational nature of the study.</p>\n<h3>Consent for publication</h3>\n<p>Not applicable.</p>\n<h3>Competing interests</h3>\n<p>The authors declare no competing interests.</p><h3>Publisher's Note</h3><p>Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p><h3>Additional file1 (DOCX 103 KB)</h3><p><b>Open Access</b> This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.</p>\n<p>Reprints and permissions</p><img alt=\"Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark\" height=\"81\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"\" width=\"57\"/><h3>Cite this article</h3><p>Monares Zepeda, E., Morales, S., Heras Garate, M.A. <i>et al.</i> Capillary refill time as an additional triage criterion to decide ICU admission of deteriorating obstetric patients. <i>Crit Care</i> <b>29</b>, 231 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05404-9</p><p>Download citation<svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"16\" role=\"img\" width=\"16\"><use xlink:href=\"#icon-eds-i-download-medium\" xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\"></use></svg></p><ul data-test=\"publication-history\"><li><p>Received<span>: </span><span><time datetime=\"2025-03-24\">24 March 2025</time></span></p></li><li><p>Accepted<span>: </span><span><time datetime=\"2025-04-04\">04 April 2025</time></span></p></li><li><p>Published<span>: </span><span><time datetime=\"2025-06-06\">06 June 2025</time></span></p></li><li><p>DOI</abbr><span>: </span><span>https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05404-9</span></p></li></ul><h3>Share this article</h3><p>Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:</p><button data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"get shareable link\" data-track-external=\"\" data-track-label=\"button\" type=\"button\">Get shareable link</button><p>Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.</p><p data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"select share url\" data-track-label=\"button\"></p><button data-track=\"click\" data-track-action=\"copy share url\" data-track-external=\"\" data-track-label=\"button\" type=\"button\">Copy to clipboard</button><p> Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative </p>","PeriodicalId":10811,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care","volume":"402 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05404-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reduction of maternal mortality remains a global public health priority, of particular interest in the developing world [1]. Prompt detection and treatment of physiological derangements are critical to avoid adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with obstetric emergencies, such as hemorrhage, hypertensive disorders, and sepsis. Indeed, the implementation of rapid response teams has been shown to improve outcomes in the obstetric population [2]. Simple and cost-effective monitoring tools for triage are essential not only for the early identification of patients but also for facilitating the initiation of supportive treatment and optimization of resource allocation [3]. However, such tools are currently lacking for this population.

Capillary refill time (CRT) is a simple diagnostic test that reflects skin perfusion and has been proposed as a marker of tissue hypoperfusion in both shock states and other conditions [4]. It has become a widely used clinical parameter as it is cost-free, universally available, and easily performed at the bedside. Unfortunately, there is a paucity of data regarding the role of CRT in the obstetric triage scenario. This study aimed to evaluate the potential usefulness of CRT as an additional triage criterion to identify the risk of ICU admission among obstetric patients assessed by a rapid response team (RRT) in an obstetric hospital.

We conducted a prospective observational study at a tertiary obstetric hospital in Ciudad de México, México. Consecutive patients in the third trimester of pregnancy or early postpartum period in the obstetric ward, for whom the RRT was activated between November 2021 and March 2024, were included. Exclusion criteria comprised patients admitted directly to the ICU from the ED or operating room, as well as pregnant patients who deteriorated in the wards following non-obstetric surgical interventions. We recorded physiological variables and commonly used severity scores, including the MEOWS score, universal vital assessment (UVA), and the obstetrically modified quick SOFA (omqSOFA) score. CRT was measured using a standardized method recommended in the literature, with a cutoff of 3.5 s [4]. The primary outcome of this study was ICU admission. ICU admission was decided on a case-by-case basis by the RRT team leader, considering the clinical context, bed availability, and their clinical gestalt, without predefined admission criteria.

During the study period, the RRT assessed 1448 obstetric patients hospitalized in the obstetric ward (Supplemental Fig. 1). Among the study population, 891 (61.5%) patients were pregnant, while 557 (38.5%) were in the postpartum period. A total of 110 patients (7.6%) were finally admitted to the ICU. The primary causes for admission were hypertensive disorders (51%), hemorrhage (17%), and septic shock (15%).

Fig. 1
Abstract Image

Impact of integrating capillary refill time into frequently used severity scoring on the relative risk of intensive care unit admission of deteriorating obstetric patients. omqSOFA: obstetrically modified quick sequential organ failure assessment; MEOWS: Modified Early Obstetric Warning System; UVA: universal vital assessment

Full size image

Supplemental Table 1 compares the prevalence of baseline physiological derangements between patients admitted to ICU and those who stayed in the wards. At RRT assessment, prolonged CRT was observed in 47.3% of patients admitted to ICU, compared to only 2.5% of those who were not (p < 0.001). Among ICU-admitted patients, those with abnormal CRT at triage required more life support interventions (23% vs 8%, p = 0.039). Furthermore, 56 patients (51%) with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy that required ICU admission had an abnormal CRT at triage.

Table 1 Relative risk of deranged physiological variables and their area under curve (AUC) to predict ICU admission
Full size table

Table 1 shows the univariate relative risk (RR) and the area under receiver operating curve (AUROC) of physiological variables to predict ICU admission, while multivariate analysis of statistically significant variables is shown in Supplemental Table 2. When analyzing their diagnostic characteristics, only an altered CRT and estimated bleeding > 1000 cc had a positive likelihood ratio (LR +) > 10, as shown in Supplemental Table 3. Supplemental Table 4 shows that CRT maintains its overall diagnostic accuracy in both hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and hypotensive syndromes. Supplemental Table 5 shows the diagnostic accuracy of different severity scoring systems to predict ICU admission, along with the impact of incorporating CRT to improve their diagnostic yield. Figure 1 depicts the impact of integrating CRT into the RR of ICU admission for each of these scores.

Our study showed that no single vital sign at triage had adequate diagnostic accuracy to identify patients requiring ICU admission, besides an altered CRT and an estimated bleeding > 1000 cc. Notably, frequently used scores for obstetric emergencies, such as omqSOFA and MEOWS, did not perform adequately either. These findings align with results from other emergency triage scenarios, where clinical gestalt has been shown to outperform scoring systems [5]. However, integrating CRT with these scores significantly enhanced their predictive accuracy. Consequently, CRT may serve as an early and specific indicator for clinical deterioration.

Pregnancy is associated with distinct hemodynamic changes. Interestingly, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy—a disease characterized by an altered microcirculation—have been shown to exhibit sublingual microcirculatory derangements, including a decreased percentage of perfused vessels, total capillary density, and functional vessel density, similar to those derangements found in septic shock [6]. In the latter, strong correlations have been established between prolonged CRT and sublingual microcirculatory abnormalities [7]. Thus, CRT could provide valuable insights into the microcirculatory status of the deteriorating obstetric patient. Given its simplicity, reproducibility, and zero cost, CRT has the potential to be seamlessly integrated into routine obstetric care. Nevertheless, further research is needed to validate its utility and optimize its implementation.

In conclusion, in a cohort of deteriorating obstetric patients in which a rapid response team was activated, an altered CRT was an accurate predictor of ICU admission and enhanced the predictive capacity of commonly used clinical scores used for triage. Bedside evaluation of CRT in obstetric emergencies emerges as a costless, simple and valuable tool for risk stratification. Future studies should further explore the utility and applications of CRT in this context.

De-identified patient data will be available with publication, upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.

CRT:

Capillary Refill Time

ICU:

Intensive Care Unit

qSOFA:

Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment

MEOWS:

Modified Early Obstetric Warning Score

UVA:

Universal Vital Assessment

ED:

Emergency Department

RRT:

Rapid Response Team

omqSOFA:

Obstetrically modified qSOFA

SD:

Standard Deviation

RR:

Relative Risks

OR:

Odds Ratio

AUC:

Area Under the Curve

  1. Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, Tunçalp Ö, Moller A-B, Daniels J, et al. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2:e323–33.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dalby PL, Gosman G. Crisis teams for obstetric patients. Crit Care Clin. 2018;34:221–38.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Maharaj R, Raffaele I, Wendon J. Rapid response systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2015;19:254.

    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  4. Hernandez G, Carmona P, Ait-Oufella H. Monitoring capillary refill time in septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2024;50:580–2.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Knack SKS, Scott N, Driver BE, Prekker ME, Black LP, Hopson C, et al. Early physician gestalt versus usual screening tools for the prediction of sepsis in critically Ill emergency patients. Ann Emerg Med. 2024;84:246–58.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ospina-Tascón GA, Nieto Calvache AJ, Quiñones E, Madriñan HJ, Valencia JD, Bermúdez WF, et al. Microcirculatory blood flow derangements during severe preeclampsia and HELLP syndrome. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2017;10:124–30.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

  7. De Backer D, Ricottilli F, Ospina-Tascón GA. Septic shock: a microcirculation disease. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2021;34:85–91.

    Article PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Not applicable.

This study received no funding.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Servicio de Ginecología y Obstetricia, Hospital General de México “Dr. Eduardo Liceaga”, Ciudad de Mexico, México

    Enrique Monares Zepeda, Annanda Márquez & Jesús Carlos Briones Garduño

  2. The Latin American Intensive Care Network (LIVEN), Santiago, Chile

    Enrique Monares Zepeda, Ricardo Castro, Gustavo Ospina-Tascón, Glenn Hernández & Eduardo Kattan

  3. Departamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Avenida Diagonal, Paraguay 362, 6510260, Santiago, Chile

    Sebastian Morales, Ricardo Castro, Glenn Hernández & Eduardo Kattan

  4. Hospital Gineco Obstétrico Pediátrico de Nueva Aurora Luz Elena Arismendi, Quito, Ecuador

    Marco Antonio Heras Garate

  5. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia

    Gustavo Ospina-Tascón

  6. Translational Research Laboratory in Critical Care Medicine (TransLab-CCM), Universidad Icesi, Cali, Colombia

    Gustavo Ospina-Tascón

Authors
  1. Enrique Monares ZepedaView author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sebastian MoralesView author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marco Antonio Heras GarateView author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Annanda MárquezView author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jesús Carlos Briones GarduñoView author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ricardo CastroView author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  7. Gustavo Ospina-TascónView author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  8. Glenn HernándezView author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  9. Eduardo KattanView author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

EMZ and EK conceived and designed the study. EMZ, MAHG, AM, JCBG, collected and verified the data. SM and EK did the statistical analysis. EMZ, MAHG, SM, GH and EK interpreted the data. EMZ, SM, RC, GOT, GH and EK drafted the initial manuscript. All authors critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content and agreed to submit the final version for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eduardo Kattan.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was conducted in line with the principles of the Delcaration of Helsinki. The Institutional Ethical Review Board of the site approved this study (project ID DECS/JPO-CT-1140-2021) and informed consent was waived due to the observational nature of the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional file1 (DOCX 103 KB)

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

Abstract Image

Cite this article

Monares Zepeda, E., Morales, S., Heras Garate, M.A. et al. Capillary refill time as an additional triage criterion to decide ICU admission of deteriorating obstetric patients. Crit Care 29, 231 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05404-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05404-9

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

毛细血管再充血时间作为决定病情恶化的产科患者是否入住ICU的附加分诊标准
降低孕产妇死亡率仍然是全球公共卫生的一个优先事项,发展中国家对此尤其感兴趣。及时发现和治疗生理紊乱对于避免与产科急诊相关的孕产妇和新生儿不良结局(如出血、高血压疾病和败血症)至关重要。事实上,快速反应小组的实施已被证明可以改善产科人口保健的结果。简单和具有成本效益的分诊监测工具不仅对于早期识别患者,而且对于促进启动支持性治疗和优化资源分配至关重要。然而,这类工具目前还缺乏。毛细血管再灌注时间(CRT)是一种反映皮肤灌注的简单诊断试验,已被提出作为休克状态和其他情况下组织灌注不足的标志。由于它是免费的,普遍可用的,并且易于在床边进行,它已成为一个广泛使用的临床参数。不幸的是,缺乏关于CRT在产科分诊中的作用的数据。本研究旨在评估CRT作为产科医院快速反应小组(RRT)评估的产科患者进入ICU风险的额外分诊标准的潜在用途。我们在姆姆希科市的一家三级产科医院进行了一项前瞻性观察研究。纳入了在2021年11月至2024年3月期间启动RRT的连续妊娠晚期或产后早期的产科病房患者。排除标准包括从急诊科或手术室直接入住ICU的患者,以及在病房接受非产科手术干预后病情恶化的孕妇。我们记录了生理变量和常用的严重程度评分,包括MEOWS评分、通用生命评估(UVA)和产科修正快速SOFA评分(omqSOFA)。CRT采用文献中推荐的标准化方法测量,截止值为3.5 s[4]。本研究的主要结局是ICU住院。ICU住院由RRT小组组长根据具体情况决定,考虑临床情况、床位可用性和临床完型,没有预先确定的住院标准。在研究期间,RRT评估了1448名产科病房住院的产科患者(补充图1)。研究人群中,891例(61.5%)为孕妇,557例(38.5%)为产后。110例(7.6%)患者最终入住ICU。入院的主要原因是高血压疾病(51%)、出血(17%)和感染性休克(15%)。将毛细血管再充血时间纳入常用严重程度评分对恶化产科患者入住重症监护病房的相对风险的影响。omqSOFA:产科改良的器官衰竭快速序贯评估;MEOWS:改进的早期产科预警系统;表1比较了ICU住院患者和非ICU住院患者基线生理紊乱的发生率。在RRT评估中,47.3%的ICU患者观察到CRT延长,而非ICU患者仅2.5% (p &lt; 0.001)。在icu住院的患者中,分诊时CRT异常的患者需要更多的生命支持干预(23%对8%,p = 0.039)。此外,56例(51%)妊娠期高血压疾病患者在分诊时CRT异常。表1生理变量异常预测ICU入院的相对风险及其曲线下面积(AUC)全尺寸表表1显示了生理变量预测ICU入院的单因素相对风险(RR)和受试者工作曲线下面积(AUROC),对有统计学意义的变量的多因素分析见补充表2。在分析他们的诊断特征时,只有改变的CRT和估计的出血&gt; 1000 cc具有阳性的似然比(LR +) &gt; 10,如补充表3所示。补充表4显示,CRT对妊娠期高血压疾病和低血压综合征的总体诊断准确性保持不变。补充表5显示了不同严重程度评分系统预测ICU入院的诊断准确性,以及合并CRT对提高其诊断率的影响。图1描述了将CRT纳入ICU入院RR对这些评分的影响。我们的研究表明,除了改变的CRT和估计出血1000毫升外,分诊时没有任何一个生命体征具有足够的诊断准确性来确定需要ICU的患者。 值得注意的是,经常使用的产科急诊评分,如omqSOFA和MEOWS,也没有充分发挥作用。这些发现与其他紧急分诊情况的结果一致,在这些情况下,临床格式塔已被证明优于[5]评分系统。然而,将CRT与这些分数相结合可显著提高其预测准确性。因此,CRT可作为临床恶化的早期特异性指标。妊娠与明显的血流动力学改变有关。有趣的是,妊娠高血压疾病——以微循环改变为特征的疾病——已被证明表现出舌下微循环紊乱,包括灌注血管百分比、总毛细血管密度和功能血管密度下降,类似于感染性休克bbb中发现的紊乱。在后者中,已建立了长时间CRT与舌下微循环异常[7]之间的强相关性。因此,CRT可以为恶化的产科患者的微循环状态提供有价值的见解。由于其简单、可重复性和零成本,CRT具有无缝集成到常规产科护理的潜力。然而,需要进一步的研究来验证其效用并优化其实现。总之,在一组病情恶化的产科患者中,快速反应小组被激活,改变的CRT是ICU入院的准确预测指标,并增强了用于分诊的常用临床评分的预测能力。在产科急诊中对CRT进行床边评估是一种无成本、简单和有价值的风险分层工具。未来的研究应进一步探索CRT在此背景下的效用和应用。在向通讯作者提出合理要求后,将在出版时提供未识别的患者数据。CRT:毛细血管再灌注时间icu:重症监护病房sofa:快速顺序器官衰竭评估meows:改进的产科早期预警评分va:通用生命评估:急诊科trrt:快速反应小组sofa:产科改进的qSOFASD:标准差rr:相对风险rr:优势比auc:曲线下面积ay L, Chou D, Gemmill A, tun<s:1> alp Ö, Moller A- b, Daniels J,等。全球孕产妇死亡原因:世卫组织系统分析。全球医学杂志,2014;2:323 - 33。文章PubMed b谷歌学者Dalby PL, Gosman G.危机小组产科患者。危重症护理,2018;34:221-38。学者Maharaj R, Raffaele I, Wendon J.快速反应系统:系统回顾和荟萃分析。危重症护理,2015;19:254。学者Hernandez G, Carmona P, Ait-Oufella H.监测感染性休克的毛细血管再充血时间。重症监护医学。2024;50:58 - 2。[文献]Scholar Knack SKS, Scott N, Driver BE, Prekker ME, Black LP, Hopson C,等。早期医师格式塔与常规筛查工具预测危重急诊患者败血症的比较[j] .中华医学杂志。2009;44(4):444 - 444。文章PubMed谷歌Scholar Ospina-Tascón GA, Nieto Calvache AJ, Quiñones E, Madriñan HJ, Valencia JD, Bermúdez WF等。微循环血流紊乱在严重子痫前期和HELLP综合征。妊娠高血压[j] . 2017; 10:24 - 30。文章PubMed谷歌学者De Backer D, Ricottilli F, Ospina-Tascón GA。感染性休克:一种微循环疾病。麻醉学杂志,2011;34:85-91。文章PubMed b谷歌学者下载参考不适用。这项研究没有得到资助。作者和附属机构服务部门Ginecología与产科,总医院de msamicxico " Dr. Eduardo Liceaga ",墨西哥城,msamicxico enrique Monares Zepeda, Annanda Márquez &;Jesús Carlos Briones GarduñoThe拉丁美洲重症监护网络(LIVEN),圣地亚哥,智利enrique Monares Zepeda, Ricardo Castro, Gustavo Ospina-Tascón, Glenn Hernández &amp;爱德华多·卡坦智利教皇大学Católica医学部强化医学系。 巴拉圭斜街大道362号,6510260号,智利圣地亚哥塞巴斯蒂安·莫拉莱斯,里卡多·卡斯特罗,格伦Hernández &;Eduardo kattan医院Gineco obst<s:1> trico Pediátrico de Nueva Aurora Luz Elena Arismendi,厄瓜多尔基多marco Antonio Heras garte重症医学系,Fundación哥伦比亚卡利Lili山谷agustavo Ospina-TascónTranslational卡利Icesi大学重症医学研究实验室(translabs - ccm)哥伦比亚agustavo Ospina-TascónAuthorsEnrique Monares ZepedaView作者出版物您也可以在pubmed谷歌ScholarSebastian MoralesView作者出版物您也可以在pubmed谷歌ScholarMarco Antonio Heras GarateView作者出版物您也可以在pubmed谷歌ScholarAnnanda MárquezView作者出版物中搜索此作者您也可以在pubmed谷歌ScholarJesús Carlos Briones GarduñoView作者中搜索此作者publations你也可以搜索这个作者在pubmed谷歌ScholarRicardo CastroView作者出版物你也可以搜索这个作者在pubmed谷歌ScholarGustavo Ospina-TascónView作者出版物你也可以搜索这个作者在pubmed谷歌ScholarGlenn HernándezView作者出版物你也可以搜索这个作者在pubmed谷歌ScholarEduardo KattanView作者出版物你也可以搜索这个作者在pubmed谷歌ScholarContributionsEMZ和EK设想并设计了这项研究。EMZ, MAHG, AM, JCBG,收集并验证数据。SM和EK进行了统计分析。EMZ、MAHG、SM、GH和EK对数据进行了解释。EMZ, SM, RC, GOT, GH和EK起草了最初的手稿。所有作者都对重要的知识内容进行了严格的修改,并同意提交最终版本发表。通讯作者:Eduardo Kattan伦理批准和同意参与本研究是按照赫尔辛基宣言的原则进行的。该网站的机构伦理审查委员会批准了这项研究(项目ID DECS/JPO-CT-1140-2021),由于该研究的观察性性质,知情同意被放弃。发表同意不适用。利益竞争作者声明没有利益竞争。出版商声明:对于已出版的地图和机构关系中的管辖权要求,普林格·自然保持中立。开放获取本文遵循知识共享署名-非商业-非衍生品4.0国际许可协议,该协议允许以任何媒介或格式进行非商业使用、共享、分发和复制,只要您适当注明原作者和来源,提供知识共享许可协议的链接,并注明您是否修改了许可材料。根据本许可协议,您无权分享源自本文或其部分内容的改编材料。本文中的图像或其他第三方材料包含在文章的知识共享许可协议中,除非在材料的署名中另有说明。如果材料未包含在文章的知识共享许可中,并且您的预期用途不被法律法规允许或超过允许的用途,您将需要直接获得版权所有者的许可。要查看该许可协议的副本,请访问http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.Reprints和permission.com,并引用本文ares Zepeda, E., Morales, S., Heras Garate, ma .等人。毛细血管再充血时间作为决定病情恶化的产科患者是否入住ICU的附加分诊标准。危重症护理29,231(2025)。https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05404-9Download citation:收稿日期:2025年3月24日接受日期:2025年4月4日发布日期:2025年6月6日doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05404-9Share这篇文章任何你分享以下链接的人都可以阅读到这篇文章:获取可共享链接对不起,这篇文章目前没有可共享链接。复制到剪贴板由施普林格自然共享内容倡议提供
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Care
Critical Care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
20.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
348
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care is an esteemed international medical journal that undergoes a rigorous peer-review process to maintain its high quality standards. Its primary objective is to enhance the healthcare services offered to critically ill patients. To achieve this, the journal focuses on gathering, exchanging, disseminating, and endorsing evidence-based information that is highly relevant to intensivists. By doing so, Critical Care seeks to provide a thorough and inclusive examination of the intensive care field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信