Lessons Learned from a Vitreoretinal Virtual Service in a Tertiary Referral Center.

Bence Tasnadi, Anthony Gigon, Huda Al-Hayouti, Shohista Saidkasimova
{"title":"Lessons Learned from a Vitreoretinal Virtual Service in a Tertiary Referral Center.","authors":"Bence Tasnadi, Anthony Gigon, Huda Al-Hayouti, Shohista Saidkasimova","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2025.0042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> We present our experience in telemedicine in a tertiary referral hospital covering the west of Scotland, from November 29, 2021, to June 27, 2022. We piloted vitreoretinal virtual clinics where patients were directly referred by community optometrists or by general ophthalmologists. Most patients were referred with an accompanying Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) scan. A consultant vitreoretinal surgeon reviewed the scans with any accompanying-colored pictures and conducted a telephone consultation with the patients. This study aimed to analyze the efficacy of this virtual service to improve delivery of future care. <b>Methods</b>: This was a retrospective audit study. All patients booked into the virtual telephone clinics for one consultant were identified through the electronic referral pathway and health care records. The total number of patients booked into these virtual clinics was 284, of which 258 attended. Each patient's referral letter and clinic letter were reviewed. Patients were also sent a questionnaire to assess their experience accessing the virtual clinic. <b>Results</b>: Of the 258 patients who attended the virtual clinic, 55 patients were listed for surgical intervention, 6 were sent for outpatient treatment, 38 were invited for a face-to-face consultation, 10 were offered surgery but declined, and 149 were discharged from the clinic. Our patient questionnaire found that 86% of attendees were satisfied with the accessibility of the appointment and 63% were confident in the quality of care provided. <b>Conclusions</b>: The combination of patients requiring no further treatment and those declining treatment demonstrated a 62% reduction in the number of face-to-face hospital appointments required. We believe the use of imaging such as OCT and wide-field colored fundus photography proves to be an excellent tool for assessment of patients in combination with a telephone discussion of symptomatology and management plans. This approach can also prove cost-effective for both the health care systems and the patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":520784,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2025.0042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We present our experience in telemedicine in a tertiary referral hospital covering the west of Scotland, from November 29, 2021, to June 27, 2022. We piloted vitreoretinal virtual clinics where patients were directly referred by community optometrists or by general ophthalmologists. Most patients were referred with an accompanying Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) scan. A consultant vitreoretinal surgeon reviewed the scans with any accompanying-colored pictures and conducted a telephone consultation with the patients. This study aimed to analyze the efficacy of this virtual service to improve delivery of future care. Methods: This was a retrospective audit study. All patients booked into the virtual telephone clinics for one consultant were identified through the electronic referral pathway and health care records. The total number of patients booked into these virtual clinics was 284, of which 258 attended. Each patient's referral letter and clinic letter were reviewed. Patients were also sent a questionnaire to assess their experience accessing the virtual clinic. Results: Of the 258 patients who attended the virtual clinic, 55 patients were listed for surgical intervention, 6 were sent for outpatient treatment, 38 were invited for a face-to-face consultation, 10 were offered surgery but declined, and 149 were discharged from the clinic. Our patient questionnaire found that 86% of attendees were satisfied with the accessibility of the appointment and 63% were confident in the quality of care provided. Conclusions: The combination of patients requiring no further treatment and those declining treatment demonstrated a 62% reduction in the number of face-to-face hospital appointments required. We believe the use of imaging such as OCT and wide-field colored fundus photography proves to be an excellent tool for assessment of patients in combination with a telephone discussion of symptomatology and management plans. This approach can also prove cost-effective for both the health care systems and the patients.

三级转诊中心玻璃体视网膜虚拟服务的经验教训。
背景:我们介绍了从2021年11月29日至2022年6月27日在覆盖苏格兰西部的一家三级转诊医院进行远程医疗的经验。我们试点了玻璃体视网膜虚拟诊所,病人由社区验光师或普通眼科医生直接转诊。大多数患者都进行了光学相干断层扫描(OCT)。一位玻璃体视网膜外科医生复查了扫描结果和相关彩色图片,并与患者进行了电话咨询。本研究旨在分析该虚拟服务对改善未来护理的效果。方法:回顾性审计研究。通过电子转诊途径和医疗保健记录确定所有预约虚拟电话诊所的一位咨询师的患者。预约这些虚拟诊所的患者总数为284人,其中258人出席了会议。对每位患者的转诊信和门诊信进行了审查。患者还被发送了一份问卷,以评估他们访问虚拟诊所的体验。结果:258例虚拟门诊患者中,手术干预55例,门诊治疗6例,会诊38例,拒绝手术10例,出院149例。我们的患者问卷调查发现,86%的参与者对预约的可及性感到满意,63%的人对所提供的护理质量充满信心。结论:不需要进一步治疗的患者和拒绝治疗的患者的组合表明,所需的面对面医院预约次数减少了62%。我们相信使用OCT和大视场彩色眼底摄影等成像技术,结合电话讨论症状和治疗方案,是评估患者的一种极好的工具。这种方法对卫生保健系统和患者都具有成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信