Poor side-to-side symmetry limits the use of the contralateral limb as a reliable reference for guiding coronal positioning and alignment in total knee arthroplasty.

Oriol Pujol, Pedro Hinarejos, Albert Pons, Ernest Famada, Angela Zumel, Juan Erquicia, Joan Leal-Blanquet
{"title":"Poor side-to-side symmetry limits the use of the contralateral limb as a reliable reference for guiding coronal positioning and alignment in total knee arthroplasty.","authors":"Oriol Pujol, Pedro Hinarejos, Albert Pons, Ernest Famada, Angela Zumel, Juan Erquicia, Joan Leal-Blanquet","doi":"10.1002/ksa.12714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the symmetry of coronal alignment in the lower limbs of patients with knee osteoarthritis to evaluate whether the contralateral lower limb can serve as a reliable reference for guiding coronal positioning and alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a multicentric cross-sectional observational study. Preoperative full-leg weight-bearing radiographies from patients with knee osteoarthritis treated with a TKA between 2022 and 2024 were analyzed. Radiological parameters were measured in both lower limbs: medial proximal tibial angle, tibial mechanical angle (TMA), lateral distal femoral angle, femoral mechanical angle (FMA), hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) and Kellgren-Lawrence. Lower limb coronal symmetry was assessed using the HKA, coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) and phenotypes classifications. The relationship between concordance rates and osteoarthritis severity and symmetry was also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-six patients were included. The operated-to-contralateral concordance for the HKA classification was 57%. It was higher when the operated knee was neutral (81%), compared to varus (58%) or valgus (27%). The CPAK concordance was 38%; it was similar across different CPAK types. The phenotype classification concordance was only 11%; 30% for the HKA parameter, 39% for FMA and 34% for TMA. There was no relationship between osteoarthritis severity or symmetry and coronal concordance rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with knee osteoarthritis have poor side-to-side symmetry in lower limb coronal alignment. The concordance rate was 56% for the HKA classification, 39% for the CPAK classification and 11% for the phenotype classification. Therefore, the contralateral lower limb may not be a reliable reference for guiding coronal positioning and alignment in TKA surgery.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":520702,"journal":{"name":"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12714","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the symmetry of coronal alignment in the lower limbs of patients with knee osteoarthritis to evaluate whether the contralateral lower limb can serve as a reliable reference for guiding coronal positioning and alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery.

Methods: This is a multicentric cross-sectional observational study. Preoperative full-leg weight-bearing radiographies from patients with knee osteoarthritis treated with a TKA between 2022 and 2024 were analyzed. Radiological parameters were measured in both lower limbs: medial proximal tibial angle, tibial mechanical angle (TMA), lateral distal femoral angle, femoral mechanical angle (FMA), hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) and Kellgren-Lawrence. Lower limb coronal symmetry was assessed using the HKA, coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) and phenotypes classifications. The relationship between concordance rates and osteoarthritis severity and symmetry was also analyzed.

Results: Seventy-six patients were included. The operated-to-contralateral concordance for the HKA classification was 57%. It was higher when the operated knee was neutral (81%), compared to varus (58%) or valgus (27%). The CPAK concordance was 38%; it was similar across different CPAK types. The phenotype classification concordance was only 11%; 30% for the HKA parameter, 39% for FMA and 34% for TMA. There was no relationship between osteoarthritis severity or symmetry and coronal concordance rates.

Conclusions: Patients with knee osteoarthritis have poor side-to-side symmetry in lower limb coronal alignment. The concordance rate was 56% for the HKA classification, 39% for the CPAK classification and 11% for the phenotype classification. Therefore, the contralateral lower limb may not be a reliable reference for guiding coronal positioning and alignment in TKA surgery.

Level of evidence: Level III.

在全膝关节置换术中,对侧肢体作为指导冠状位定位和对齐的可靠参考,由于两侧对称性差,限制了对侧肢体的使用。
目的:评估膝关节骨性关节炎患者下肢冠状位对齐的对称性,以评价对侧下肢是否可以作为指导全膝关节置换术(TKA)中冠状位对齐的可靠参考。方法:这是一项多中心横断面观察性研究。分析了2022年至2024年间接受TKA治疗的膝关节骨性关节炎患者的术前全腿负重x线片。测量双下肢放射学参数:胫骨内侧近端角、胫骨机械角(TMA)、股骨外侧远端角、股骨机械角(FMA)、髋关节-膝关节-踝关节角(HKA)和Kellgren-Lawrence角。采用HKA、膝关节冠状面排列(CPAK)和表型分类评估下肢冠状面对称性。分析了一致性率与骨关节炎严重程度和对称性之间的关系。结果:纳入76例患者。手术-对侧HKA分类的一致性为57%。与内翻(58%)或外翻(27%)相比,手术膝关节中性时(81%)的发生率更高。CPAK的一致性为38%;在不同的CPAK类型中是相似的。表型分类一致性仅为11%;HKA参数占30%,FMA占39%,TMA占34%。骨关节炎的严重程度或对称性与冠状一致率之间没有关系。结论:膝关节骨性关节炎患者下肢冠状位侧对侧对称性较差。HKA分类的一致性率为56%,CPAK分类的一致性率为39%,表型分类的一致性率为11%。因此,在TKA手术中,对侧下肢可能不是指导冠状定位和对准的可靠参考。证据等级:三级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信