Letter to the Editor: The Availability of Midwifery Care in Rural United States Communities

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Myra DeLuca CNM, MSN
{"title":"Letter to the Editor: The Availability of Midwifery Care in Rural United States Communities","authors":"Myra DeLuca CNM, MSN","doi":"10.1111/jmwh.13763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To the Editor:</p><p>In “The Availability of Midwifery Care in Rural United States Communities,” Sheffield et al state that 75% of rural hospitals that recently closed their maternity services had no midwifery care component present.<span><sup>1</sup></span> The article was informative and eye-opening.</p><p>The findings that rural birthing people have obstacles to obtaining maternity care and even more difficulty having choices in their care providers highlight an important area for further research that, understandably, was not within the scope of this study to explore. The article inspired further thinking about the reasons for the lack of midwifery care in rural America.</p><p>Educational, legislative, and economic barriers inhibit the growth of midwifery, especially in rural communities, where more than one-third of the rural counties lack trained perinatal providers.<span><sup>2, 3</sup></span> Midwives may face unique difficulties with interprofessional collaboration due to health care provider shortages or maldistribution of the providers who are available as consultants. Lengthy geographic distance to access care is also an inherent barrier to rural health care. Finally, established institutions may lack the infrastructure to integrate midwives into their systems.<span><sup>4</sup></span> Due to these barriers, and because of the tremendous shortage of perinatal resources available in rural communities, further studies looking at other potential barriers to midwifery care are warranted, especially in rural communities.</p><p>One factor that researchers could examine is whether current or past interprofessional relationships between physicians and midwives affect the availability of midwifery care to rural birthing people. For midwifery to reach the full potential impact possible, midwives must be well-supported and integrated into health care systems and teams everywhere.</p><p>Further research on interprofessional collaboration could create opportunities for innovative strategies for meeting the needs of rural communities. This could begin with resident physician education that focuses on integrating midwives into physicians’ early careers by using experienced midwives as teachers in residency programs. Midwives work closely with resident physicians at my practice setting, teaching hands-on skills and running simulations together. Reading this article has made me curious about the potential long-term consequences of a teaching strategy like this. Some research already focused on this type of interprofessional education model showing greater collaboration as a result. The recently published article, “Certified Nurse-Midwives as Teachers: Expanding Interprofessional Collaboration Learning Opportunities for Medical Students on the Obstetrics and Gynecology Clerkship,” is an exemplar; however, research on this topic is limited.<span><sup>5</sup></span></p><p>Given the findings of the Sheffield et al article, including the number of closed maternity departments where midwifery services were absent, all factors affecting the availability of midwifery care are worthy of being explored.<span><sup>1</sup></span> My thanks to the authors. I hope the article along with these thoughts will foster further discussions and research.</p><p>The author has no personal, professional, or financial conflicts of interest to disclose related to this submission.</p>","PeriodicalId":16468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","volume":"70 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jmwh.13763","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jmwh.13763","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To the Editor:

In “The Availability of Midwifery Care in Rural United States Communities,” Sheffield et al state that 75% of rural hospitals that recently closed their maternity services had no midwifery care component present.1 The article was informative and eye-opening.

The findings that rural birthing people have obstacles to obtaining maternity care and even more difficulty having choices in their care providers highlight an important area for further research that, understandably, was not within the scope of this study to explore. The article inspired further thinking about the reasons for the lack of midwifery care in rural America.

Educational, legislative, and economic barriers inhibit the growth of midwifery, especially in rural communities, where more than one-third of the rural counties lack trained perinatal providers.2, 3 Midwives may face unique difficulties with interprofessional collaboration due to health care provider shortages or maldistribution of the providers who are available as consultants. Lengthy geographic distance to access care is also an inherent barrier to rural health care. Finally, established institutions may lack the infrastructure to integrate midwives into their systems.4 Due to these barriers, and because of the tremendous shortage of perinatal resources available in rural communities, further studies looking at other potential barriers to midwifery care are warranted, especially in rural communities.

One factor that researchers could examine is whether current or past interprofessional relationships between physicians and midwives affect the availability of midwifery care to rural birthing people. For midwifery to reach the full potential impact possible, midwives must be well-supported and integrated into health care systems and teams everywhere.

Further research on interprofessional collaboration could create opportunities for innovative strategies for meeting the needs of rural communities. This could begin with resident physician education that focuses on integrating midwives into physicians’ early careers by using experienced midwives as teachers in residency programs. Midwives work closely with resident physicians at my practice setting, teaching hands-on skills and running simulations together. Reading this article has made me curious about the potential long-term consequences of a teaching strategy like this. Some research already focused on this type of interprofessional education model showing greater collaboration as a result. The recently published article, “Certified Nurse-Midwives as Teachers: Expanding Interprofessional Collaboration Learning Opportunities for Medical Students on the Obstetrics and Gynecology Clerkship,” is an exemplar; however, research on this topic is limited.5

Given the findings of the Sheffield et al article, including the number of closed maternity departments where midwifery services were absent, all factors affecting the availability of midwifery care are worthy of being explored.1 My thanks to the authors. I hope the article along with these thoughts will foster further discussions and research.

The author has no personal, professional, or financial conflicts of interest to disclose related to this submission.

助产护理在美国农村社区的可用性。
致编辑:在“美国农村社区助产护理的可得性”中,Sheffield等人指出,最近关闭产科服务的75%的农村医院不存在助产护理成分这篇文章内容丰富,令人大开眼界。农村分娩人群在获得产科护理方面存在障碍,在选择护理提供者方面更有困难,这一发现突出了一个值得进一步研究的重要领域,可以理解的是,这一领域不在本研究的探讨范围之内。这篇文章激发了人们对美国农村缺乏助产护理的原因的进一步思考。教育、立法和经济障碍阻碍了助产的发展,特别是在农村社区,超过三分之一的农村县缺乏训练有素的围产期服务提供者。2,3由于医疗保健提供者短缺或作为顾问的提供者分布不均,助产士在跨专业合作方面可能面临独特的困难。获得保健的地理距离较远也是农村保健的一个固有障碍。最后,已建立的机构可能缺乏将助产士纳入其系统的基础设施由于这些障碍,以及农村社区围产期资源的严重短缺,有必要进一步研究助产护理的其他潜在障碍,特别是在农村社区。研究人员可以研究的一个因素是,医生和助产士之间目前或过去的跨专业关系是否会影响农村分娩人群获得助产护理的机会。为了使助产发挥最大的潜在影响,助产士必须得到良好的支持,并融入各地的卫生保健系统和团队。对专业间合作的进一步研究可以为满足农村社区需要的创新战略创造机会。这可以从住院医师教育开始,重点是通过在住院医师项目中使用经验丰富的助产士作为教师,将助产士融入医生的早期职业生涯。在我的实习环境中,助产士与住院医师密切合作,教授实践技能并一起进行模拟。阅读这篇文章让我对这种教学策略的潜在长期后果感到好奇。一些研究已经集中在这种跨专业教育模式上,结果显示出更大的合作。最近发表的文章《作为教师的注册护士-助产士:扩大医学生在妇产科见习方面的跨专业合作学习机会》就是一个范例;然而,这方面的研究是有限的。考虑到Sheffield等人文章的发现,包括缺少助产服务的关闭产科部门的数量,所有影响助产护理可用性的因素都值得探索感谢作者。我希望这篇文章以及这些想法将促进进一步的讨论和研究。作者没有个人、专业或财务利益冲突要披露与此提交相关的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Midwifery & Women''s Health (JMWH) is a bimonthly, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the publication of original research and review articles that focus on midwifery and women''s health. JMWH provides a forum for interdisciplinary exchange across a broad range of women''s health issues. Manuscripts that address midwifery, women''s health, education, evidence-based practice, public health, policy, and research are welcomed
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信