Key laboratory changes in severe trauma, a different pattern for each clinical phenotype.

Adrián Marcos-Morales, Jesús Abelardo Barea Mendoza, Marcos Valiente Fernández, Carlos García Fuentes, Fernando Calvo Boyero, Cecilia Cueto-Felgueroso, Judith Gutiérrez Gutiérrez, Francisco de Paula Delgado Moya, Carolina Mudarra Reche, Susana Bermejo Aznárez, Alfonso Lagares, Mario Chico Fernández
{"title":"Key laboratory changes in severe trauma, a different pattern for each clinical phenotype.","authors":"Adrián Marcos-Morales, Jesús Abelardo Barea Mendoza, Marcos Valiente Fernández, Carlos García Fuentes, Fernando Calvo Boyero, Cecilia Cueto-Felgueroso, Judith Gutiérrez Gutiérrez, Francisco de Paula Delgado Moya, Carolina Mudarra Reche, Susana Bermejo Aznárez, Alfonso Lagares, Mario Chico Fernández","doi":"10.1016/j.medine.2025.502227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>to compare the different evolution of conventional laboratory parameters between three severe trauma phenotypes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Observational study of a prospectively collected cohort of severe trauma patients, with retrospective database completion, studied between 2012 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A trauma intensive care unit (ICU).</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Severe trauma patients were defined by an Abbreviated Injury Scale of ≥ 3 in at least one aspect. Three groups were stablished according to hemodynamic status and Glasgow coma scale (GCS), and they were subsequently subdivided in prematurely deceased and survivors after > 72 h (h). Laboratory parameters were followed up to 96 h, statistical analysis between groups and subgroups was performed at 0 and 24 h.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Main variables of interest: </strong>Prehospital, clinical variables on admission, prognostic variables (prospective gathering); blood count, biochemistry, coagulation, blood gas analysis (retrospectively collected).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1631 patients were included, 8% prematurely deceased. Initial leukocytosis and hyperglycemia were common in all groups. Hemodynamically stable patients with a GCS < 14 stood out due to a high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and hypernatremia, both of them at 24 h, together with initial coagulopathy in the prematurely deceased. Hemodynamically unstable patients exhibited an initial pattern of lactic acidosis, coagulopathy, and decreased platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, hemoglobin, albumin and calcium, all these changes being most prominent in the prematurely deceased. A 24 h peak in NLR was found in both the hemodynamically unstable and GCS < 14 groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Evolution of laboratory parameters differ according to the patient's phenotype. They complete the initial severity evaluation and in hemodynamically stable patients they act as a warning for potential neurological damage.</p>","PeriodicalId":94139,"journal":{"name":"Medicina intensiva","volume":" ","pages":"502227"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medine.2025.502227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: to compare the different evolution of conventional laboratory parameters between three severe trauma phenotypes.

Design: Observational study of a prospectively collected cohort of severe trauma patients, with retrospective database completion, studied between 2012 and 2022.

Setting: A trauma intensive care unit (ICU).

Patients: Severe trauma patients were defined by an Abbreviated Injury Scale of ≥ 3 in at least one aspect. Three groups were stablished according to hemodynamic status and Glasgow coma scale (GCS), and they were subsequently subdivided in prematurely deceased and survivors after > 72 h (h). Laboratory parameters were followed up to 96 h, statistical analysis between groups and subgroups was performed at 0 and 24 h.

Interventions: None.

Main variables of interest: Prehospital, clinical variables on admission, prognostic variables (prospective gathering); blood count, biochemistry, coagulation, blood gas analysis (retrospectively collected).

Results: 1631 patients were included, 8% prematurely deceased. Initial leukocytosis and hyperglycemia were common in all groups. Hemodynamically stable patients with a GCS < 14 stood out due to a high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and hypernatremia, both of them at 24 h, together with initial coagulopathy in the prematurely deceased. Hemodynamically unstable patients exhibited an initial pattern of lactic acidosis, coagulopathy, and decreased platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, hemoglobin, albumin and calcium, all these changes being most prominent in the prematurely deceased. A 24 h peak in NLR was found in both the hemodynamically unstable and GCS < 14 groups.

Conclusion: Evolution of laboratory parameters differ according to the patient's phenotype. They complete the initial severity evaluation and in hemodynamically stable patients they act as a warning for potential neurological damage.

关键实验室变化严重创伤,不同的模式为每个临床表型。
目的:比较三种严重创伤表型间常规实验室参数的演变差异。设计:对2012年至2022年期间前瞻性收集的严重创伤患者队列进行观察性研究,并完成回顾性数据库。环境:创伤重症监护病房(ICU)。患者:严重创伤患者以至少一个方面≥3的简略损伤量表定义。根据血流动力学状态和格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)分为三组,再分为早亡组和> 72 h (h)后的存活组。随访实验室参数至96 h, 0、24 h组间及亚组间进行统计学分析。主要感兴趣的变量:院前、入院时临床变量、预后变量(前瞻性收集);血细胞计数,生化,凝血,血气分析(回顾性收集)。结果:共纳入1631例患者,其中8%过早死亡。各组均有初始白细胞增多和高血糖。GCS < 14的血流动力学稳定的患者由于高中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR)和高钠血症而突出,这两种情况都发生在24小时,以及过早死亡的初始凝血功能障碍。血流动力学不稳定的患者表现为乳酸性酸中毒、凝血功能障碍、血小板/淋巴细胞比率、血红蛋白、白蛋白和钙降低,所有这些变化在过早死亡的患者中最为突出。血流动力学不稳定组和GCS < 14组NLR均出现24 h峰值。结论:实验室参数的演变根据患者的表型不同而不同。它们完成了最初的严重程度评估,在血流动力学稳定的患者中,它们作为潜在神经损伤的警告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信