Quantifying Healthcare Provider Perceptions of a Novel Deep Learning Algorithm to Predict Sepsis: Electronic Survey.

Q4 Medicine
Critical care explorations Pub Date : 2025-06-04 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000001276
Karthik Ramesh, Aaron Boussina, Supreeth P Shashikumar, Atul Malhotra, Christopher A Longhurst, Christopher S Josef, Kimberly Quintero, Jake Del Rosso, Shamim Nemati, Gabriel Wardi
{"title":"Quantifying Healthcare Provider Perceptions of a Novel Deep Learning Algorithm to Predict Sepsis: Electronic Survey.","authors":"Karthik Ramesh, Aaron Boussina, Supreeth P Shashikumar, Atul Malhotra, Christopher A Longhurst, Christopher S Josef, Kimberly Quintero, Jake Del Rosso, Shamim Nemati, Gabriel Wardi","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Sepsis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, with early intervention shown to improve outcomes. Predictive modeling and artificial intelligence (AI) can aid in early sepsis recognition, but there remains a gap between algorithm development and clinical use. Despite the importance of user experience in adopting clinical predictive models, few studies have focused on provider acceptance and feedback.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate healthcare worker perception and acceptance of a deep learning sepsis prediction model in the emergency department (ED).</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>COnformal Multidimensional Prediction Of SEpsis Risk (COMPOSER), a deep learning algorithm, is used at two EDs of a large academic medical center to predict sepsis before clear clinical presentation. An internally developed survey following the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys was distributed to team members who received a COMPOSER alert.</p><p><strong>Analysis: </strong>Mann-Whitney U testing was performed on results stratified by provider experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 114 responses were received: 76 from doctors of medicine/doctors of osteopathic medicine, 34 from registered nurses, and four from nurse practicioners/physician assistants. Of these, 53% were from providers with fewer than 5 years of experience. Seventy-seven percent of respondents had a positive or neutral perception of the alert's usefulness. Providers with 0-5 years of experience were more likely to expect sepsis after the alert (p = 0.021) and found the alert more useful (p = 0.016) compared with those with 6+ years of experience. Additionally, physicians with 0-5 years of experience were more likely to say the alert changed their patient management (p = 0.048).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Less experienced providers were more likely to perceive benefit from the alert, which was overall received favorably. Future AI implementations might consider tailored alert patterns and education to enhance reception and reduce fatigue.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":"7 6","pages":"e1276"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12140755/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Sepsis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, with early intervention shown to improve outcomes. Predictive modeling and artificial intelligence (AI) can aid in early sepsis recognition, but there remains a gap between algorithm development and clinical use. Despite the importance of user experience in adopting clinical predictive models, few studies have focused on provider acceptance and feedback.

Objectives: To evaluate healthcare worker perception and acceptance of a deep learning sepsis prediction model in the emergency department (ED).

Design, setting, and participants: COnformal Multidimensional Prediction Of SEpsis Risk (COMPOSER), a deep learning algorithm, is used at two EDs of a large academic medical center to predict sepsis before clear clinical presentation. An internally developed survey following the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys was distributed to team members who received a COMPOSER alert.

Analysis: Mann-Whitney U testing was performed on results stratified by provider experience.

Results: A total of 114 responses were received: 76 from doctors of medicine/doctors of osteopathic medicine, 34 from registered nurses, and four from nurse practicioners/physician assistants. Of these, 53% were from providers with fewer than 5 years of experience. Seventy-seven percent of respondents had a positive or neutral perception of the alert's usefulness. Providers with 0-5 years of experience were more likely to expect sepsis after the alert (p = 0.021) and found the alert more useful (p = 0.016) compared with those with 6+ years of experience. Additionally, physicians with 0-5 years of experience were more likely to say the alert changed their patient management (p = 0.048).

Conclusions: Less experienced providers were more likely to perceive benefit from the alert, which was overall received favorably. Future AI implementations might consider tailored alert patterns and education to enhance reception and reduce fatigue.

量化医疗保健提供者对一种新型深度学习算法预测败血症的看法:电子调查。
重要性:败血症是发病率和死亡率的主要原因,早期干预可改善预后。预测建模和人工智能(AI)可以帮助早期败血症识别,但算法开发与临床应用之间仍存在差距。尽管在采用临床预测模型时用户体验很重要,但很少有研究关注提供者的接受度和反馈。目的:评估急诊科(ED)医护人员对深度学习脓毒症预测模型的认知和接受程度。设计、设置和参与者:一种深度学习算法——适形多维脓毒症风险预测(COMPOSER),在一家大型学术医疗中心的两个急诊科使用,在明确的临床表现之前预测脓毒症。根据互联网电子调查报告结果清单,内部开发的调查被分发给收到COMPOSER警报的团队成员。分析:Mann-Whitney U检验对结果按提供者经验分层。结果:共收到114份回复,其中76份来自内科医生/骨科医生,34份来自注册护士,4份来自执业护士/医师助理。其中,53%来自经验不足5年的医疗机构。77%的受访者对警报的有用性持积极或中立的看法。与具有6年以上经验的提供者相比,具有0-5年经验的提供者更有可能在警报后预测败血症(p = 0.021),并且发现警报更有用(p = 0.016)。此外,拥有0-5年经验的医生更有可能说警报改变了他们的患者管理(p = 0.048)。结论:经验不足的提供者更有可能从警报中获益,总的来说,这是有利的。未来的人工智能实施可能会考虑量身定制的警报模式和教育,以增强接收能力并减少疲劳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信