{"title":"Evaluation of the dosimetric impact and safety of MucoUp as a spacer in gynecologic brachytherapy.","authors":"Kae Okuma, Akane Yoshiba, Hiroyuki Okamoto, Koji Inaba, Tomoya Kaneda, Tairo Kashihara, Kyohei Nakatani, Kana Takahashi, Madoka Sakuramachi, Ayaka Nagao, Yuko Nakayama, Hiroshi Igaki","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2025.04.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gynecologic brachytherapy (BT) is an essential component of definitive radiation therapy, but excessive radiation exposure to organs at risk (OARs) remains a major concern. MucoUp, a hyaluronic acid-based spacer, has been introduced to physically separate the high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) from adjacent OARs. However, its clinical feasibility and dosimetric impact remain underexplored.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the dosimetric impact and clinical feasibility of MucoUp in high-dose-rate (HDR) gynecologic BT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 5 patients with gynecologic malignancies who underwent HDR BT with and without MucoUp injection. Dosimetric parameters, including HR-CTV D90 and OAR D2cc (bladder, rectum), were compared between sessions with and without MucoUp. Spacer volume retention was assessed using pre- and post-treatment CT scans.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MucoUp injection resulted in a significant reduction in rectal D2cc (7.19 Gy vs. 6.73 Gy, p = 0.043), while maintaining HR-CTV dose coverage (D90: 8.82 Gy vs. 9.15 Gy, p = 0.043). A nonsignificant reduction in bladder D2cc was observed (7.51 Gy vs. 7.16 Gy, p = 0.34). Spacer volume retention remained stable throughout treatment. No procedural complications or acute toxicity were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that MucoUp is a promising spacer for gynecologic BT, effectively reducing rectal dose while preserving HR-CTV coverage. Given its high stability and safety, MucoUp may serve as an alternative to existing spacer materials. Further large-scale and long-term studies are warranted to evaluate its impact on late toxicities.</p>","PeriodicalId":93914,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brachytherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2025.04.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Gynecologic brachytherapy (BT) is an essential component of definitive radiation therapy, but excessive radiation exposure to organs at risk (OARs) remains a major concern. MucoUp, a hyaluronic acid-based spacer, has been introduced to physically separate the high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) from adjacent OARs. However, its clinical feasibility and dosimetric impact remain underexplored.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the dosimetric impact and clinical feasibility of MucoUp in high-dose-rate (HDR) gynecologic BT.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 5 patients with gynecologic malignancies who underwent HDR BT with and without MucoUp injection. Dosimetric parameters, including HR-CTV D90 and OAR D2cc (bladder, rectum), were compared between sessions with and without MucoUp. Spacer volume retention was assessed using pre- and post-treatment CT scans.
Results: MucoUp injection resulted in a significant reduction in rectal D2cc (7.19 Gy vs. 6.73 Gy, p = 0.043), while maintaining HR-CTV dose coverage (D90: 8.82 Gy vs. 9.15 Gy, p = 0.043). A nonsignificant reduction in bladder D2cc was observed (7.51 Gy vs. 7.16 Gy, p = 0.34). Spacer volume retention remained stable throughout treatment. No procedural complications or acute toxicity were observed.
Conclusion: This study suggests that MucoUp is a promising spacer for gynecologic BT, effectively reducing rectal dose while preserving HR-CTV coverage. Given its high stability and safety, MucoUp may serve as an alternative to existing spacer materials. Further large-scale and long-term studies are warranted to evaluate its impact on late toxicities.
背景:妇科近距离放射治疗(BT)是明确放射治疗的重要组成部分,但过度辐射暴露于危险器官(OARs)仍然是一个主要问题。MucoUp是一种基于透明质酸的隔离剂,可将高风险临床靶体积(HR-CTV)与相邻的桨叶进行物理分离。然而,其临床可行性和剂量学影响仍未得到充分探讨。目的:评价MucoUp在高剂量率(HDR)妇科BT中的剂量学影响及临床可行性。方法:回顾性分析5例接受高剂量率(HDR)妇科BT治疗的妇科恶性肿瘤患者,分别注射MucoUp和不注射MucoUp。剂量学参数,包括HR-CTV D90和OAR D2cc(膀胱,直肠),在使用和不使用MucoUp的疗程之间进行比较。通过治疗前和治疗后的CT扫描评估间隔器体积保留。结果:MucoUp注射可显著降低直肠D2cc(7.19 Gy vs. 6.73 Gy, p = 0.043),同时保持HR-CTV剂量覆盖(D90: 8.82 Gy vs. 9.15 Gy, p = 0.043)。膀胱D2cc无显著降低(7.51 Gy vs. 7.16 Gy, p = 0.34)。在整个治疗过程中,隔离剂体积保持稳定。无手术并发症及急性毒性。结论:MucoUp是一种很有前景的妇科BT间隔剂,可有效降低直肠剂量,同时保持HR-CTV覆盖。鉴于其高稳定性和安全性,MucoUp可以作为现有隔离材料的替代品。需要进一步的大规模和长期研究来评估其对晚期毒性的影响。