How often does a mixed type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm on imaging indicate pathological involvement of the main pancreatic duct?

Kosuke Takahashi, Ichiro Yasuda, Toshiki Entani, Iori Motoo, Nobuhiko Hayashi, Takayuki Ando, Haruka Fujinami, Kazuto Tajiri, Johji Imura, Kenichi Hirabayashi, Eisuke Ozawa, Hisamitsu Miyaaki, Kazuhiko Nakao
{"title":"How often does a mixed type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm on imaging indicate pathological involvement of the main pancreatic duct?","authors":"Kosuke Takahashi, Ichiro Yasuda, Toshiki Entani, Iori Motoo, Nobuhiko Hayashi, Takayuki Ando, Haruka Fujinami, Kazuto Tajiri, Johji Imura, Kenichi Hirabayashi, Eisuke Ozawa, Hisamitsu Miyaaki, Kazuhiko Nakao","doi":"10.1111/den.15051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>A pancreatic cyst >5 mm in diameter that communicates with the dilated main pancreatic duct (MPD) ≥5 mm on imaging is defined as mixed type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (MX-IPMN). However, the frequency of tumor involvement of the MPD in MX-IPMN remains unknown. This study investigated how often MX-IPMNs involve the MPD and whether MPD involvement can be diagnosed by peroral pancreatoscopy (POPS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent POPS for MX-IPMN followed by surgical resection between July 2018 and December 2021. The pathological features of MX-IPMN, including tumor extension to the MPD, were analyzed. Additionally, the diagnostic performance of various imaging modalities in detecting tumor extension to the MPD was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among a total of 15 patients, 10 (67%) had pathologically confirmed tumor extension to the MPD. In most cases with pathologically confirmed MPD involvement, the main tumor was diagnosed as high-grade dysplasia (60%) or invasive carcinoma (10%). Conversely, low-grade dysplasia was the main lesion in most cases without MPD involvement (low-grade dysplasia 80%; high-grade dysplasia 20%, invasive carcinoma 0%). The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of POPS with or without biopsy was 93.3%, 90.0%, and 100%, respectively. POPS demonstrated higher accuracy and sensitivity than computed tomography, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and endoscopic ultrasonography (accuracy: 93.3%, 40%, 60%, and 80%; sensitivity: 93.3%, 10%, 40%, and 70%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, 67% of MX-IPMNs had pathologically proven MPD involvement. Tumor extension to the MPD is highly suspicious of malignancy, and POPS may be useful for evaluating MPD involvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":72813,"journal":{"name":"Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/den.15051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: A pancreatic cyst >5 mm in diameter that communicates with the dilated main pancreatic duct (MPD) ≥5 mm on imaging is defined as mixed type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (MX-IPMN). However, the frequency of tumor involvement of the MPD in MX-IPMN remains unknown. This study investigated how often MX-IPMNs involve the MPD and whether MPD involvement can be diagnosed by peroral pancreatoscopy (POPS).

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent POPS for MX-IPMN followed by surgical resection between July 2018 and December 2021. The pathological features of MX-IPMN, including tumor extension to the MPD, were analyzed. Additionally, the diagnostic performance of various imaging modalities in detecting tumor extension to the MPD was evaluated.

Results: Among a total of 15 patients, 10 (67%) had pathologically confirmed tumor extension to the MPD. In most cases with pathologically confirmed MPD involvement, the main tumor was diagnosed as high-grade dysplasia (60%) or invasive carcinoma (10%). Conversely, low-grade dysplasia was the main lesion in most cases without MPD involvement (low-grade dysplasia 80%; high-grade dysplasia 20%, invasive carcinoma 0%). The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of POPS with or without biopsy was 93.3%, 90.0%, and 100%, respectively. POPS demonstrated higher accuracy and sensitivity than computed tomography, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and endoscopic ultrasonography (accuracy: 93.3%, 40%, 60%, and 80%; sensitivity: 93.3%, 10%, 40%, and 70%, respectively).

Conclusions: Overall, 67% of MX-IPMNs had pathologically proven MPD involvement. Tumor extension to the MPD is highly suspicious of malignancy, and POPS may be useful for evaluating MPD involvement.

混合型导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤在影像学上显示胰腺主管病变的频率是多少?
目的:胰腺囊肿直径≥5mm,与扩张的主胰管(MPD)连通,影像学≥5mm,定义为混合型导管内乳头状粘液瘤(MX-IPMN)。然而,MX-IPMN中MPD累及肿瘤的频率尚不清楚。本研究探讨了MX-IPMNs累及MPD的频率,以及MPD累及是否可以通过经口胰镜(POPS)诊断。方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入了2018年7月至2021年12月期间因MX-IPMN接受持久性有机污染物治疗并手术切除的患者。我们分析了MX-IPMN的病理特征,包括肿瘤向MPD的扩展。此外,评估了各种成像方式在检测肿瘤向MPD扩展方面的诊断性能。结果:15例患者中,10例(67%)病理证实肿瘤向MPD扩散。在大多数病理证实MPD累及的病例中,主要肿瘤诊断为高度不典型增生(60%)或浸润性癌(10%)。相反,在大多数没有MPD累及的病例中,低级别发育不良是主要病变(低级别发育不良占80%;高度不典型增生20%,浸润性癌0%)。活检前后对持久性有机污染物的诊断准确性、敏感性和特异性分别为93.3%、90.0%和100%。与计算机断层扫描、磁共振胰胆管造影和超声内镜检查相比,POPS具有更高的准确性和灵敏度(准确率分别为93.3%、40%、60%和80%;灵敏度:分别为93.3%、10%、40%和70%)。结论:总体而言,67%的MX-IPMNs有病理证实的MPD累及。肿瘤扩展到MPD是高度可疑的恶性肿瘤,持久性有机污染物可能有助于评估MPD的累及。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信