{"title":"How often does a mixed type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm on imaging indicate pathological involvement of the main pancreatic duct?","authors":"Kosuke Takahashi, Ichiro Yasuda, Toshiki Entani, Iori Motoo, Nobuhiko Hayashi, Takayuki Ando, Haruka Fujinami, Kazuto Tajiri, Johji Imura, Kenichi Hirabayashi, Eisuke Ozawa, Hisamitsu Miyaaki, Kazuhiko Nakao","doi":"10.1111/den.15051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>A pancreatic cyst >5 mm in diameter that communicates with the dilated main pancreatic duct (MPD) ≥5 mm on imaging is defined as mixed type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (MX-IPMN). However, the frequency of tumor involvement of the MPD in MX-IPMN remains unknown. This study investigated how often MX-IPMNs involve the MPD and whether MPD involvement can be diagnosed by peroral pancreatoscopy (POPS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent POPS for MX-IPMN followed by surgical resection between July 2018 and December 2021. The pathological features of MX-IPMN, including tumor extension to the MPD, were analyzed. Additionally, the diagnostic performance of various imaging modalities in detecting tumor extension to the MPD was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among a total of 15 patients, 10 (67%) had pathologically confirmed tumor extension to the MPD. In most cases with pathologically confirmed MPD involvement, the main tumor was diagnosed as high-grade dysplasia (60%) or invasive carcinoma (10%). Conversely, low-grade dysplasia was the main lesion in most cases without MPD involvement (low-grade dysplasia 80%; high-grade dysplasia 20%, invasive carcinoma 0%). The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of POPS with or without biopsy was 93.3%, 90.0%, and 100%, respectively. POPS demonstrated higher accuracy and sensitivity than computed tomography, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and endoscopic ultrasonography (accuracy: 93.3%, 40%, 60%, and 80%; sensitivity: 93.3%, 10%, 40%, and 70%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, 67% of MX-IPMNs had pathologically proven MPD involvement. Tumor extension to the MPD is highly suspicious of malignancy, and POPS may be useful for evaluating MPD involvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":72813,"journal":{"name":"Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/den.15051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: A pancreatic cyst >5 mm in diameter that communicates with the dilated main pancreatic duct (MPD) ≥5 mm on imaging is defined as mixed type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (MX-IPMN). However, the frequency of tumor involvement of the MPD in MX-IPMN remains unknown. This study investigated how often MX-IPMNs involve the MPD and whether MPD involvement can be diagnosed by peroral pancreatoscopy (POPS).
Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent POPS for MX-IPMN followed by surgical resection between July 2018 and December 2021. The pathological features of MX-IPMN, including tumor extension to the MPD, were analyzed. Additionally, the diagnostic performance of various imaging modalities in detecting tumor extension to the MPD was evaluated.
Results: Among a total of 15 patients, 10 (67%) had pathologically confirmed tumor extension to the MPD. In most cases with pathologically confirmed MPD involvement, the main tumor was diagnosed as high-grade dysplasia (60%) or invasive carcinoma (10%). Conversely, low-grade dysplasia was the main lesion in most cases without MPD involvement (low-grade dysplasia 80%; high-grade dysplasia 20%, invasive carcinoma 0%). The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of POPS with or without biopsy was 93.3%, 90.0%, and 100%, respectively. POPS demonstrated higher accuracy and sensitivity than computed tomography, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and endoscopic ultrasonography (accuracy: 93.3%, 40%, 60%, and 80%; sensitivity: 93.3%, 10%, 40%, and 70%, respectively).
Conclusions: Overall, 67% of MX-IPMNs had pathologically proven MPD involvement. Tumor extension to the MPD is highly suspicious of malignancy, and POPS may be useful for evaluating MPD involvement.