Surgical, Hybrid, or Delayed Surgical Stage 1: Single-Ventricle Palliation Pathway Utilization and Outcome Trends.

IF 5 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Journal of the American Heart Association Pub Date : 2025-06-17 Epub Date: 2025-06-05 DOI:10.1161/JAHA.124.039616
Michael Kuntz, Steven Staffa, Eleonore Valencia, Aditya Kaza, Viviane G Nasr
{"title":"Surgical, Hybrid, or Delayed Surgical Stage 1: Single-Ventricle Palliation Pathway Utilization and Outcome Trends.","authors":"Michael Kuntz, Steven Staffa, Eleonore Valencia, Aditya Kaza, Viviane G Nasr","doi":"10.1161/JAHA.124.039616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pathways for single-ventricle palliation include traditional neonatal surgical stage 1 palliation (SP), hybrid stage 1 palliation (HP; pulmonary artery flow restriction with ductal stenting), and delayed surgical stage 1 palliation (DSP), preceded by pulmonary artery flow restriction and prostaglandins. Findings from studies aiming to determine the optimal pathway are conflicting. We aimed to describe current pathway utilization and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the Pediatric Health Information System between January 2016 and August 2023, we identified 1872 patients who underwent single-ventricle palliation (1573 SP, 123 DSP, and 176 HP).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prematurity or low birth weight (<2.5 kg) were most common for DSP (52.9%) compared with SP (15.3%) and HP (36.4%) (<i>P</i><0.001). Comorbid conditions were most common for DSP. Case selection varied based on hospital volume; centers in the lowest volume quintile performed relatively more HP and DSP. In-hospital mortality and index hospitalization transplant were highest among HP (25.6%, 8.5%) compared with DSP (13.8%, 0.8%) and SP (11.3%, 0.9%) (<i>P</i><0.001). Hospital and intensive care unit length of stay were highest for DSP (both <i>P</i><0.001). Patients born prematurely or with low birth weight showed the highest in-hospital mortality for HP (35.9%) compared with DSP (16.9%) and SP (19.9%) (<i>P</i>=0.012); postprocedure length of stay was longest for DSP (<i>P</i>=0.026). The costs per day did not vary.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DSP was used for patients with a higher rate of prematurity, lower birth weight, and more noncardiac comorbid conditions. HP, however, was associated with higher in-hospital mortality and index hospitalization transplant. Further study to determine the potential benefit of DSP for high-risk patients is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":54370,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":" ","pages":"e039616"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.124.039616","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pathways for single-ventricle palliation include traditional neonatal surgical stage 1 palliation (SP), hybrid stage 1 palliation (HP; pulmonary artery flow restriction with ductal stenting), and delayed surgical stage 1 palliation (DSP), preceded by pulmonary artery flow restriction and prostaglandins. Findings from studies aiming to determine the optimal pathway are conflicting. We aimed to describe current pathway utilization and outcomes.

Methods: Using the Pediatric Health Information System between January 2016 and August 2023, we identified 1872 patients who underwent single-ventricle palliation (1573 SP, 123 DSP, and 176 HP).

Results: Prematurity or low birth weight (<2.5 kg) were most common for DSP (52.9%) compared with SP (15.3%) and HP (36.4%) (P<0.001). Comorbid conditions were most common for DSP. Case selection varied based on hospital volume; centers in the lowest volume quintile performed relatively more HP and DSP. In-hospital mortality and index hospitalization transplant were highest among HP (25.6%, 8.5%) compared with DSP (13.8%, 0.8%) and SP (11.3%, 0.9%) (P<0.001). Hospital and intensive care unit length of stay were highest for DSP (both P<0.001). Patients born prematurely or with low birth weight showed the highest in-hospital mortality for HP (35.9%) compared with DSP (16.9%) and SP (19.9%) (P=0.012); postprocedure length of stay was longest for DSP (P=0.026). The costs per day did not vary.

Conclusions: DSP was used for patients with a higher rate of prematurity, lower birth weight, and more noncardiac comorbid conditions. HP, however, was associated with higher in-hospital mortality and index hospitalization transplant. Further study to determine the potential benefit of DSP for high-risk patients is warranted.

手术,混合或延迟手术1期:单心室姑息途径的使用和结果趋势。
背景:单心室姑息的途径包括传统的新生儿手术1期姑息(SP)、混合1期姑息(HP;肺动脉血流限制(导管支架置入术)和延迟手术1期缓解(DSP),之前是肺动脉血流限制和前列腺素。旨在确定最佳途径的研究结果相互矛盾。我们的目的是描述当前途径的利用和结果。方法:利用2016年1月至2023年8月的儿科健康信息系统,我们确定了1872例接受单心室姑息治疗的患者(1573例SP, 123例DSP和176例HP)。结果:早产或低出生体重(PPPP=0.012);术后住院时间以DSP组最长(P=0.026)。每天的费用没有变化。结论:DSP适用于早产率较高、出生体重较低、非心脏合并症较多的患者。然而,HP与较高的住院死亡率和住院移植指数相关。进一步研究确定DSP对高危患者的潜在益处是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the American Heart Association
Journal of the American Heart Association CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
1749
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: As an Open Access journal, JAHA - Journal of the American Heart Association is rapidly and freely available, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice. JAHA is an authoritative, peer-reviewed Open Access journal focusing on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. JAHA provides a global forum for basic and clinical research and timely reviews on cardiovascular disease and stroke. As an Open Access journal, its content is free on publication to read, download, and share, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信