Technology-Facilitated Sexual Exploitation Module of the SES-V: Prevalence and Differential Vulnerability Across Two U.S. National Samples.

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Martie P Thompson, Robin M Kowalski, Zoë D Peterson, RaeAnn Anderson, Mary P Koss
{"title":"Technology-Facilitated Sexual Exploitation Module of the SES-V: Prevalence and Differential Vulnerability Across Two U.S. National Samples.","authors":"Martie P Thompson, Robin M Kowalski, Zoë D Peterson, RaeAnn Anderson, Mary P Koss","doi":"10.1080/00224499.2025.2509085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sexual exploitation represents a significant public health problem. One form of sexual exploitation that warrants urgent attention is technology-facilitated sexual exploitation (TFSE), especially given rapid increases in digital technology and social media usage, particularly among young people. The newly updated Sexual Experiences Survey (SES-V), a measure of sexual exploitation, now includes a module to measure TFSE. Using data from an online sample of US college students (<i>n</i> = 460, <i>M</i><sub><i>age</i></sub> = 24.17) and an online sample of U.S. adults (<i>n</i> = 347, <i>M</i><sub><i>age</i></sub> = 45.42), we examined the prevalence of TFSE, determined risk for TFSE among different demographic groups, and evaluated its overlap with other forms of sexual exploitation. Results indicated high rates of TFSE; the college student sample had a higher prevalence than the community adult sample on eight of the 10 TFSE items. In the online sample of adults, younger and LGBQ+ participants were more likely to experience TFSE, and, in the online sample of college students, those who were female, white, identified as LGBQ+, and were older were more likely than their respective counterparts to experience TFSE. In both samples, those who experienced TFSE were more likely to have experienced other forms of sexual exploitation. Findings support the inclusion of a TFSE module when assessing sexual exploitation that will enable researchers to make comparisons across different samples, assess the co-occurrence of in-person and online sexual exploitation, and determine differential vulnerability factors and consequences of online and offline sexual exploitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":51361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sex Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sex Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2025.2509085","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sexual exploitation represents a significant public health problem. One form of sexual exploitation that warrants urgent attention is technology-facilitated sexual exploitation (TFSE), especially given rapid increases in digital technology and social media usage, particularly among young people. The newly updated Sexual Experiences Survey (SES-V), a measure of sexual exploitation, now includes a module to measure TFSE. Using data from an online sample of US college students (n = 460, Mage = 24.17) and an online sample of U.S. adults (n = 347, Mage = 45.42), we examined the prevalence of TFSE, determined risk for TFSE among different demographic groups, and evaluated its overlap with other forms of sexual exploitation. Results indicated high rates of TFSE; the college student sample had a higher prevalence than the community adult sample on eight of the 10 TFSE items. In the online sample of adults, younger and LGBQ+ participants were more likely to experience TFSE, and, in the online sample of college students, those who were female, white, identified as LGBQ+, and were older were more likely than their respective counterparts to experience TFSE. In both samples, those who experienced TFSE were more likely to have experienced other forms of sexual exploitation. Findings support the inclusion of a TFSE module when assessing sexual exploitation that will enable researchers to make comparisons across different samples, assess the co-occurrence of in-person and online sexual exploitation, and determine differential vulnerability factors and consequences of online and offline sexual exploitation.

SES-V的技术促进性剥削模块:两个美国国家样本的患病率和差异脆弱性。
性剥削是一个重大的公共卫生问题。需要紧急关注的一种性剥削形式是技术促进的性剥削(TFSE),特别是考虑到数字技术和社交媒体的使用迅速增加,特别是在年轻人中。新近更新的性经验调查(SES-V)是衡量性剥削的一项指标,现在包含了一个衡量TFSE的模块。利用美国大学生在线样本(n = 460, Mage = 24.17)和美国成年人在线样本(n = 347, Mage = 45.42)的数据,我们检查了TFSE的患病率,确定了不同人口群体中TFSE的风险,并评估了其与其他形式的性剥削的重叠程度。结果表明:TFSE发生率高;大学生样本在10个TFSE项目中的8个项目的患病率高于社区成人样本。在成年人的在线样本中,年轻人和LGBQ+参与者更有可能经历TFSE,而在大学生的在线样本中,那些女性、白人、LGBQ+和年龄较大的人比他们的同龄人更有可能经历TFSE。在这两个样本中,经历过TFSE的人更有可能经历过其他形式的性剥削。研究结果支持在评估性剥削时纳入TFSE模块,这将使研究人员能够对不同样本进行比较,评估当面性剥削和在线性剥削的共同发生情况,并确定在线和离线性剥削的不同脆弱性因素和后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sex Research (JSR) is a scholarly journal devoted to the publication of articles relevant to the variety of disciplines involved in the scientific study of sexuality. JSR is designed to stimulate research and promote an interdisciplinary understanding of the diverse topics in contemporary sexual science. JSR publishes empirical reports, theoretical essays, literature reviews, methodological articles, historical articles, teaching papers, book reviews, and letters to the editor. JSR actively seeks submissions from researchers outside of North America.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信