Hip Strength and Activation in Individuals With Ankle Instability During the Single-Leg Squat Test.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Lindsay A Carroll, Benjamin R Kivlan, RobRoy L Martin, Amy L Phelps, Christopher Carcia
{"title":"Hip Strength and Activation in Individuals With Ankle Instability During the Single-Leg Squat Test.","authors":"Lindsay A Carroll, Benjamin R Kivlan, RobRoy L Martin, Amy L Phelps, Christopher Carcia","doi":"10.1123/jsr.2024-0360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Hip muscle function has been reported to be altered in individuals with chronic ankle instability (CAI). The purpose of this study was to determine whether the single-leg squat test (SLST) could be used to detect differences in proximal muscle activation between individuals with and without CAI and to determine if there were differences in strength of the hip lateral rotators, extensors, and abductors between individuals with and without CAI.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A case-control study design was used to compare hip muscle activation and strength during the SLST between individuals with CAI, lateral ankle sprain copers, and healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-eight participants (14 males, 34 females; median age = 22.00 y) participated in this study. Participants were separated into CAI (n = 18), coper (n = 15), and control (n = 15) groups based on published criteria. Surface electromyography was used to measure muscle activation of the gluteus maximus and gluteus medius during the SLST. Strength of the hip lateral rotators, extensors, and abductors was measured using handheld dynamometry and quantified using maximum isometric body weight normalized torque.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CAI group utilized significantly more gluteus maximus muscle activation during the SLST than both the coper (P < .001) and control (P < .001) groups. The CAI group had weaker hip lateral rotators when compared with the coper (P = .001) and control (P < .001) groups, and weaker hip extensors strength when compared with the control group (P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results support existing literature demonstrating that there are proximal neuromuscular changes in individuals with CAI and suggest that the SLST has potential for use as a clinical measure of gluteus maximus activation in individuals with CAI. Further study is needed to determine whether the differences in activation are clinically detectable.</p>","PeriodicalId":50041,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2024-0360","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Hip muscle function has been reported to be altered in individuals with chronic ankle instability (CAI). The purpose of this study was to determine whether the single-leg squat test (SLST) could be used to detect differences in proximal muscle activation between individuals with and without CAI and to determine if there were differences in strength of the hip lateral rotators, extensors, and abductors between individuals with and without CAI.

Design: A case-control study design was used to compare hip muscle activation and strength during the SLST between individuals with CAI, lateral ankle sprain copers, and healthy controls.

Methods: Forty-eight participants (14 males, 34 females; median age = 22.00 y) participated in this study. Participants were separated into CAI (n = 18), coper (n = 15), and control (n = 15) groups based on published criteria. Surface electromyography was used to measure muscle activation of the gluteus maximus and gluteus medius during the SLST. Strength of the hip lateral rotators, extensors, and abductors was measured using handheld dynamometry and quantified using maximum isometric body weight normalized torque.

Results: The CAI group utilized significantly more gluteus maximus muscle activation during the SLST than both the coper (P < .001) and control (P < .001) groups. The CAI group had weaker hip lateral rotators when compared with the coper (P = .001) and control (P < .001) groups, and weaker hip extensors strength when compared with the control group (P < .001).

Conclusion: The results support existing literature demonstrating that there are proximal neuromuscular changes in individuals with CAI and suggest that the SLST has potential for use as a clinical measure of gluteus maximus activation in individuals with CAI. Further study is needed to determine whether the differences in activation are clinically detectable.

在单腿深蹲试验中,踝关节不稳定个体的髋关节力量和激活。
背景:据报道,慢性踝关节不稳定(CAI)患者的髋关节肌肉功能发生改变。本研究的目的是确定单腿深蹲试验(SLST)是否可以用于检测患有和不患有CAI的个体之间近端肌肉激活的差异,以及确定患有和不患有CAI的个体之间髋侧旋肌、伸肌和外展肌的力量是否存在差异。设计:采用病例对照研究设计,比较CAI患者、踝关节外侧扭伤患者和健康对照者在SLST期间的髋关节肌肉激活和力量。方法:48例受试者(男14例,女34例;中位年龄= 22.00岁)参加本研究。根据已公布的标准,将参与者分为CAI组(n = 18)、铜组(n = 15)和对照组(n = 15)。表面肌电图用于测量SLST期间臀大肌和臀中肌的肌肉激活。使用手持式测力仪测量髋侧旋肌、伸肌和外展肌的强度,并使用最大等距体重归一化扭矩进行量化。结果:CAI组在SLST期间臀大肌的激活明显高于铜组(P < 0.001)和对照组(P < 0.001)。CAI组髋侧旋肌强度较铜组(P = .001)和对照组(P < .001)弱,髋关节伸肌强度较对照组(P < .001)弱。结论:结果支持现有文献,表明CAI个体存在近端神经肌肉变化,并提示SLST有可能用于临床测量CAI个体的臀大肌激活。需要进一步的研究来确定在临床上是否可以检测到激活的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
143
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sport Rehabilitation (JSR) is your source for the latest peer-reviewed research in the field of sport rehabilitation. All members of the sports-medicine team will benefit from the wealth of important information in each issue. JSR is completely devoted to the rehabilitation of sport and exercise injuries, regardless of the age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status of the participant. JSR publishes peer-reviewed original research, systematic reviews/meta-analyses, critically appraised topics (CATs), case studies/series, and technical reports that directly affect the management and rehabilitation of injuries incurred during sport-related activities, irrespective of the individual’s age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status. The journal is intended to provide an international, multidisciplinary forum to serve the needs of all members of the sports medicine team, including athletic trainers/therapists, sport physical therapists/physiotherapists, sports medicine physicians, and other health care and medical professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信