Real-World Evidence in FDA Approvals for Labeling Expansion of Small Molecules and Biologics.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Yung-Fang Deng, Cynthia J Girman, Mary E Ritchey
{"title":"Real-World Evidence in FDA Approvals for Labeling Expansion of Small Molecules and Biologics.","authors":"Yung-Fang Deng, Cynthia J Girman, Mary E Ritchey","doi":"10.1007/s43441-025-00816-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Real-world evidence (RWE) can support the evaluation of safety and efficacy for medical products, but its extent of use in labeling expansion submissions remains unclear. This study aimed to characterize the RWE used in labeling expansion or likely used, as identified through literature search, for drugs and biologics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified RWE used in FDA-approved labeling expansion for drug and biologic supplemental applications from January 2022 to May 2024 (Drugs@FDA), using FDA prescribing information and review documents. We also searched ClinicalTrials.gov and PubMed to identify RWE not included in the FDA approval letter and labeling but could have been incorporated into submissions by sponsors. Characteristics of the RWE were extracted and summarized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 218 labeling expansions granted, RWE was found in FDA documents for 3 approvals and elsewhere for 52 approvals. The proportion of approvals with RWE was 23.3%, 27.7%, and 23.7% in 2022, 2023, and 2024, respectively. RWE was most commonly found in submissions for oncology (43.6%), infection (9.1%), and dermatology (7.3%). Greater use of RWE was identified in submissions for drugs (69.1%) and to expand indications (78.2%). RWE came from 88 studies, with 48.9% addressing both safety and efficacy. Most of the RWE studies were retrospective (65.9%), employed a cohort study design (87.5%), and used electronic health records (EHR) data (75.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We observed limited RWE use in granted labeling expansion, and the reason is unclear due to incomplete FDA documentation of supplemental approvals-RWE may not have been submitted, may have been submitted but determined by FDA to be of limited use, may have contributed substantively to the supplemental approval, or some combination of these across submissions. Improving accessibility and transparency in RWE's acceptability within review documents can enhance our understanding of the extent and quality of RWE used for labeling expansion.</p>","PeriodicalId":23084,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","volume":" ","pages":"982-992"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12446098/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-025-00816-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Real-world evidence (RWE) can support the evaluation of safety and efficacy for medical products, but its extent of use in labeling expansion submissions remains unclear. This study aimed to characterize the RWE used in labeling expansion or likely used, as identified through literature search, for drugs and biologics.

Methods: We identified RWE used in FDA-approved labeling expansion for drug and biologic supplemental applications from January 2022 to May 2024 (Drugs@FDA), using FDA prescribing information and review documents. We also searched ClinicalTrials.gov and PubMed to identify RWE not included in the FDA approval letter and labeling but could have been incorporated into submissions by sponsors. Characteristics of the RWE were extracted and summarized.

Results: Among 218 labeling expansions granted, RWE was found in FDA documents for 3 approvals and elsewhere for 52 approvals. The proportion of approvals with RWE was 23.3%, 27.7%, and 23.7% in 2022, 2023, and 2024, respectively. RWE was most commonly found in submissions for oncology (43.6%), infection (9.1%), and dermatology (7.3%). Greater use of RWE was identified in submissions for drugs (69.1%) and to expand indications (78.2%). RWE came from 88 studies, with 48.9% addressing both safety and efficacy. Most of the RWE studies were retrospective (65.9%), employed a cohort study design (87.5%), and used electronic health records (EHR) data (75.0%).

Conclusion: We observed limited RWE use in granted labeling expansion, and the reason is unclear due to incomplete FDA documentation of supplemental approvals-RWE may not have been submitted, may have been submitted but determined by FDA to be of limited use, may have contributed substantively to the supplemental approval, or some combination of these across submissions. Improving accessibility and transparency in RWE's acceptability within review documents can enhance our understanding of the extent and quality of RWE used for labeling expansion.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

FDA批准小分子和生物制剂标签扩展的真实证据。
真实证据(RWE)可以支持医疗产品的安全性和有效性评价,但其在标签扩展申请中的使用程度尚不清楚。本研究旨在描述通过文献检索确定的用于药物和生物制剂的标签扩展或可能使用的RWE。方法:我们利用FDA处方信息和审查文件,确定了2022年1月至2024年5月FDA批准的药物和生物制剂补充申请的标签扩展中使用的RWE (Drugs@FDA)。我们还检索了ClinicalTrials.gov和PubMed,以确定RWE没有包括在FDA的批准信和标签中,但可以纳入赞助商提交的材料中。提取并总结了RWE的特征。结果:在批准的218个标签扩展中,RWE在FDA文件中被发现3个批准,在其他地方被发现52个批准。2022年、2023年和2024年,RWE的批准比例分别为23.3%、27.7%和23.7%。RWE最常见于肿瘤学(43.6%)、感染(9.1%)和皮肤病学(7.3%)。在药品申报(69.1%)和扩大适应症(78.2%)中发现了更多的RWE使用。RWE来自88项研究,其中48.9%涉及安全性和有效性。大多数RWE研究为回顾性研究(65.9%),采用队列研究设计(87.5%),并使用电子健康记录(EHR)数据(75.0%)。结论:我们观察到RWE在批准的标签扩展中使用有限,原因尚不清楚,因为FDA补充批准文件不完整-RWE可能没有提交,可能已经提交但被FDA确定为使用有限,可能对补充批准有实质性贡献,或者这些提交的组合。在审核文件中提高RWE可接受性的可及性和透明度可以增强我们对RWE用于标签扩展的程度和质量的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science MEDICAL INFORMATICS-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science (TIRS) is the official scientific journal of DIA that strives to advance medical product discovery, development, regulation, and use through the publication of peer-reviewed original and review articles, commentaries, and letters to the editor across the spectrum of converting biomedical science into practical solutions to advance human health. The focus areas of the journal are as follows: Biostatistics Clinical Trials Product Development and Innovation Global Perspectives Policy Regulatory Science Product Safety Special Populations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信