Efficacy of Combined Aerobic Exercise and Coaching on Physical Fitness in People With Neuromuscular Diseases: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 7.7 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurology Pub Date : 2025-07-08 Epub Date: 2025-06-04 DOI:10.1212/WNL.0000000000213781
Sander Oorschot, Merel-Anne Brehm, Annerieke C van Groenestijn, Tim Veneman, Jos Twisk, Camiel Verhamme, Filip Eftimov, Judith G M Jelsma, Vibeke Valkenburg, Esther Kruitwagen, Patrice Tomassen, Heleen van der Wielen, Nicole B M Voet, Nicol Cornelia Voermans, Frans Nollet, Eric L Voorn
{"title":"Efficacy of Combined Aerobic Exercise and Coaching on Physical Fitness in People With Neuromuscular Diseases: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Sander Oorschot, Merel-Anne Brehm, Annerieke C van Groenestijn, Tim Veneman, Jos Twisk, Camiel Verhamme, Filip Eftimov, Judith G M Jelsma, Vibeke Valkenburg, Esther Kruitwagen, Patrice Tomassen, Heleen van der Wielen, Nicole B M Voet, Nicol Cornelia Voermans, Frans Nollet, Eric L Voorn","doi":"10.1212/WNL.0000000000213781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The quality of evidence for improving physical fitness in people with neuromuscular diseases (NMDs) through aerobic exercise is low. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of combined personalized home-based aerobic exercise and coaching on physical fitness in people with NMD, compared with usual care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a multicenter, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial, participants with different types of NMD were randomized (1:1 ratio) to a 6-month intervention (personalized home-based aerobic exercise and coaching) or usual care. Assessments were performed at baseline, directly after intervention, and at 6 and 12 months after intervention. The primary outcome was physical fitness, measured as peak oxygen uptake (VO<sub>2peak</sub>) directly after intervention. Secondary outcomes included daily physical activity, quality of life, physical functioning, metabolic syndrome markers, and creatine kinase level. We conducted intention-to-treat linear mixed-model analyses for all outcomes, with the baseline value of the particular outcome as covariate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-one participants (median age = 64.0, 60% female) were randomized to the intervention (n = 44) or usual care (n = 47) group. The mean group difference in VO<sub>2peak</sub> directly after intervention was 2.2 mL/min/kg (95% CI 0.2-4.1, <i>p</i> = 0.028) and 1.7 mL/min/kg (95% CI 0.1-3.4, <i>p</i> = 0.039) on average over time, in favor of the intervention group. There were no significant between-group differences in the secondary outcomes. Twenty-five and 22 adverse events were reported in the intervention and usual care groups, respectively. Creatine kinase levels remained unchanged.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study provides evidence that combined personalized home-based aerobic exercise and coaching is safe and improves physical fitness in people with NMD, but without evidence of improved physical functioning, daily physical activity, quality of life, or metabolic syndrome markers. This home-based approach has good potential for wider implementation. Future research should explore the association between changes in VO<sub>2peak</sub> and functional outcomes and strategies to counteract the slightly diminishing long-term intervention effect.</p><p><strong>Trial registration information: </strong>The study was registered in the Netherlands Trial Register (ID: NL7344) on November 5, 2018. The first participant enrolled on September 19, 2018. However, the Ethics Review Committee of the Amsterdam Medical Center approved the study protocol on November 7, 2017. No adjustments were made to the approved study protocol, and the register corresponds one on one with the approved study protocol.</p><p><strong>Classification of evidence: </strong>This study provides Class II evidence that a 6-month personalized aerobic exercise program combined with coaching improves maximal aerobic capacity in patients with NMDs without effective cures.</p>","PeriodicalId":19256,"journal":{"name":"Neurology","volume":"105 1","pages":"e213781"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12141421/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000213781","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: The quality of evidence for improving physical fitness in people with neuromuscular diseases (NMDs) through aerobic exercise is low. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of combined personalized home-based aerobic exercise and coaching on physical fitness in people with NMD, compared with usual care.

Methods: In a multicenter, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial, participants with different types of NMD were randomized (1:1 ratio) to a 6-month intervention (personalized home-based aerobic exercise and coaching) or usual care. Assessments were performed at baseline, directly after intervention, and at 6 and 12 months after intervention. The primary outcome was physical fitness, measured as peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) directly after intervention. Secondary outcomes included daily physical activity, quality of life, physical functioning, metabolic syndrome markers, and creatine kinase level. We conducted intention-to-treat linear mixed-model analyses for all outcomes, with the baseline value of the particular outcome as covariate.

Results: Ninety-one participants (median age = 64.0, 60% female) were randomized to the intervention (n = 44) or usual care (n = 47) group. The mean group difference in VO2peak directly after intervention was 2.2 mL/min/kg (95% CI 0.2-4.1, p = 0.028) and 1.7 mL/min/kg (95% CI 0.1-3.4, p = 0.039) on average over time, in favor of the intervention group. There were no significant between-group differences in the secondary outcomes. Twenty-five and 22 adverse events were reported in the intervention and usual care groups, respectively. Creatine kinase levels remained unchanged.

Discussion: This study provides evidence that combined personalized home-based aerobic exercise and coaching is safe and improves physical fitness in people with NMD, but without evidence of improved physical functioning, daily physical activity, quality of life, or metabolic syndrome markers. This home-based approach has good potential for wider implementation. Future research should explore the association between changes in VO2peak and functional outcomes and strategies to counteract the slightly diminishing long-term intervention effect.

Trial registration information: The study was registered in the Netherlands Trial Register (ID: NL7344) on November 5, 2018. The first participant enrolled on September 19, 2018. However, the Ethics Review Committee of the Amsterdam Medical Center approved the study protocol on November 7, 2017. No adjustments were made to the approved study protocol, and the register corresponds one on one with the approved study protocol.

Classification of evidence: This study provides Class II evidence that a 6-month personalized aerobic exercise program combined with coaching improves maximal aerobic capacity in patients with NMDs without effective cures.

有氧运动与训练相结合对神经肌肉疾病患者身体健康的影响:一项随机临床试验
背景和目的:通过有氧运动改善神经肌肉疾病(NMDs)患者身体健康的证据质量很低。本研究的目的是评估与常规护理相比,个性化家庭有氧运动和指导相结合对NMD患者身体健康的影响。方法:在一项多中心、评估盲、随机对照试验中,不同类型NMD的参与者被随机(1:1比例)分配到6个月的干预(个性化的家庭有氧运动和指导)或常规护理。评估分别在基线、干预后直接、干预后6个月和12个月进行。主要终点是身体健康,在干预后直接以峰值摄氧量(vo2峰值)测量。次要结局包括每日体力活动、生活质量、身体功能、代谢综合征标志物和肌酸激酶水平。我们对所有结果进行了意向治疗线性混合模型分析,将特定结果的基线值作为协变量。结果:91名参与者(中位年龄为64.0岁,60%为女性)随机分为干预组(n = 44)和常规护理组(n = 47)。干预后两组VO2peak随时间平均差异分别为2.2 mL/min/kg (95% CI 0.2 ~ 4.1, p = 0.028)和1.7 mL/min/kg (95% CI 0.1 ~ 3.4, p = 0.039),均优于干预组。两组间次要结局无显著差异。干预组和常规护理组分别报告了25例和22例不良事件。肌酸激酶水平保持不变。讨论:本研究提供的证据表明,结合个性化的家庭有氧运动和教练是安全的,可以改善NMD患者的身体健康,但没有证据表明可以改善身体功能、日常身体活动、生活质量或代谢综合征标志物。这种以家庭为基础的方法具有广泛实施的良好潜力。未来的研究应该探索vo2峰值变化与功能结局之间的关系,以及抵消长期干预效果轻微减弱的策略。试验注册信息:该研究于2018年11月5日在荷兰试验注册中心(ID: NL7344)注册。第一名参与者于2018年9月19日注册。然而,阿姆斯特丹医学中心伦理审查委员会于2017年11月7日批准了该研究方案。未对已批准的研究方案进行调整,注册表与已批准的研究方案一一对应。证据分类:这项研究提供了II级证据,表明6个月的个性化有氧运动计划结合教练可以提高无有效治愈的nmd患者的最大有氧能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurology
Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
1973
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurology, the official journal of the American Academy of Neurology, aspires to be the premier peer-reviewed journal for clinical neurology research. Its mission is to publish exceptional peer-reviewed original research articles, editorials, and reviews to improve patient care, education, clinical research, and professionalism in neurology. As the leading clinical neurology journal worldwide, Neurology targets physicians specializing in nervous system diseases and conditions. It aims to advance the field by presenting new basic and clinical research that influences neurological practice. The journal is a leading source of cutting-edge, peer-reviewed information for the neurology community worldwide. Editorial content includes Research, Clinical/Scientific Notes, Views, Historical Neurology, NeuroImages, Humanities, Letters, and position papers from the American Academy of Neurology. The online version is considered the definitive version, encompassing all available content. Neurology is indexed in prestigious databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Biological Abstracts®, PsycINFO®, Current Contents®, Web of Science®, CrossRef, and Google Scholar.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信