Patterns of Medical Care Cost by Service Type Associated With Lung Cancer Screening.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Kris Wain, Mahesh Maiyani, Nikki M Carroll, Rafael Meza, Robert T Greenlee, Christine Neslund-Dudas, Michelle R Odelberg, Caryn Oshiro, Debra P Ritzwoller
{"title":"Patterns of Medical Care Cost by Service Type Associated With Lung Cancer Screening.","authors":"Kris Wain, Mahesh Maiyani, Nikki M Carroll, Rafael Meza, Robert T Greenlee, Christine Neslund-Dudas, Michelle R Odelberg, Caryn Oshiro, Debra P Ritzwoller","doi":"10.1097/MLR.0000000000002169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lung cancer screening (LCS) enhances early stage cancer detection; however, its impact on health care costs in real-world clinical settings is not well understood. The objective of this study was to assess changes in health care costs during the 12 months before LCS compared with the 12 months after.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed health care costs based upon Medicare's fee-for-service reimbursement system using data from the Population-based Research to Optimize the Screening Process Lung Consortium. We included individuals who met age and smoking LCS eligibility criteria and were engaged within 4 health care systems between February 5, 2015, and December 31, 2021. Generalized linear models estimated health care costs from the payer perspective during 12 months prior and 12 months post baseline LCS. We compared these costs to eligible individuals who did not receive LCS. Secondary analyses examined costs among the sample who completed LCS by positive versus negative scan results. We reported mean predicted costs with average values for all other explanatory variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 10,049 eligible individuals who received baseline LCS and 15,233 who did not receive LCS. Receipt of LCS was associated with additional costs of $3698 compared with individuals not receiving LCS. Secondary analyses found costs increased by $11,664 among individuals with positive scans; however, no increases occurred among individuals with negative scans.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest LCS was only associated with increased health care costs among patients with a positive scan. LCS is a potentially cost-effective approach to identify early stage lung cancer. Healthcare systems should prioritize strategies to improve LCS participation.</p>","PeriodicalId":18364,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000002169","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Lung cancer screening (LCS) enhances early stage cancer detection; however, its impact on health care costs in real-world clinical settings is not well understood. The objective of this study was to assess changes in health care costs during the 12 months before LCS compared with the 12 months after.

Methods: This retrospective study analyzed health care costs based upon Medicare's fee-for-service reimbursement system using data from the Population-based Research to Optimize the Screening Process Lung Consortium. We included individuals who met age and smoking LCS eligibility criteria and were engaged within 4 health care systems between February 5, 2015, and December 31, 2021. Generalized linear models estimated health care costs from the payer perspective during 12 months prior and 12 months post baseline LCS. We compared these costs to eligible individuals who did not receive LCS. Secondary analyses examined costs among the sample who completed LCS by positive versus negative scan results. We reported mean predicted costs with average values for all other explanatory variables.

Results: We identified 10,049 eligible individuals who received baseline LCS and 15,233 who did not receive LCS. Receipt of LCS was associated with additional costs of $3698 compared with individuals not receiving LCS. Secondary analyses found costs increased by $11,664 among individuals with positive scans; however, no increases occurred among individuals with negative scans.

Conclusion: These findings suggest LCS was only associated with increased health care costs among patients with a positive scan. LCS is a potentially cost-effective approach to identify early stage lung cancer. Healthcare systems should prioritize strategies to improve LCS participation.

不同服务类型与肺癌筛查相关的医疗费用模式。
肺癌筛查(LCS)提高了早期癌症的检测;然而,在现实世界的临床环境中,它对医疗保健成本的影响尚不清楚。本研究的目的是评估LCS前12个月与LCS后12个月医疗保健费用的变化。方法:本回顾性研究分析了基于医疗保险按服务收费报销系统的医疗保健成本,使用了基于人群的研究优化筛查过程肺联盟的数据。我们纳入了符合年龄和吸烟LCS资格标准的个人,并在2015年2月5日至2021年12月31日期间参与了4个医疗保健系统。广义线性模型从付款人的角度估计了基线LCS之前和之后12个月的医疗保健费用。我们将这些费用与未接受LCS的符合条件的个体进行了比较。第二次分析通过扫描结果为阳性和阴性来检查完成LCS的样本的成本。我们用所有其他解释变量的平均值报告平均预测成本。结果:我们确定了10,049名接受基线LCS的符合条件的个体和15,233名未接受LCS的个体。与未接受LCS的人相比,接受LCS的人的额外费用为3698美元。二次分析发现,扫描呈阳性的人的成本增加了11,664美元;然而,在阴性扫描的个体中没有增加。结论:这些发现表明,LCS仅与扫描呈阳性的患者的医疗费用增加有关。LCS是一种潜在的具有成本效益的方法来识别早期肺癌。医疗保健系统应优先考虑提高LCS参与的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Care
Medical Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
228
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Rated as one of the top ten journals in healthcare administration, Medical Care is devoted to all aspects of the administration and delivery of healthcare. This scholarly journal publishes original, peer-reviewed papers documenting the most current developments in the rapidly changing field of healthcare. This timely journal reports on the findings of original investigations into issues related to the research, planning, organization, financing, provision, and evaluation of health services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信