Effects of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on Chronic Uncontrolled Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial in a Shared Primary Care Setting.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Medical Care Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-05 DOI:10.1097/MLR.0000000000002170
Ryan Bellacov, Yvonne Novasio
{"title":"Effects of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on Chronic Uncontrolled Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial in a Shared Primary Care Setting.","authors":"Ryan Bellacov, Yvonne Novasio","doi":"10.1097/MLR.0000000000002170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the context of escalating diabetes prevalence worldwide, this study investigates the efficacy of integrating cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) within primary care visits for managing uncontrolled diabetes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The randomized clinical trial in an integrated health care clinic in Oregon involved 72 adults aged 20-89 with uncontrolled diabetes. Participants were enrolled and randomly assigned to 2 groups: one receiving both cognitive behavioral health (n=36) and the other receiving traditional primary care (n=36).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study primarily measured clinical improvements in hemoglobin A1C levels for a year. Results indicated significant improvements in the cognitive behavioral health group compared with the traditional care group at various intervals up to 51 weeks, with notable enhancements in hemoglobin A1C and secondary outcomes of patient satisfaction scores. During the 36 th and 51st weeks, the shared visit group demonstrated significantly lower hemoglobin A1c levels (36 wk: 9.22±0.2 vs. 10.02±0.2, P <0.001; 51 wk: 9.22±0.1 vs. 10.91±0.2, P <0.001), indicating improved long-term glycemic control.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combining cognitive behavioral health with primary care visits significantly outperformed traditional care in improving clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction among adults with uncontrolled diabetes. The percentage of participants with clinically meaningful improvement in 36 weeks was 22.2% in the CBT versus 0.0% in the traditional primary care visit group. The positive outcomes suggest that integrated cognitive behavioral therapy can effectively contribute to diabetes management strategies, highlighting the importance of innovative approaches in addressing the diabetes epidemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":18364,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care","volume":" ","pages":"539-544"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000002170","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the context of escalating diabetes prevalence worldwide, this study investigates the efficacy of integrating cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) within primary care visits for managing uncontrolled diabetes.

Design: The randomized clinical trial in an integrated health care clinic in Oregon involved 72 adults aged 20-89 with uncontrolled diabetes. Participants were enrolled and randomly assigned to 2 groups: one receiving both cognitive behavioral health (n=36) and the other receiving traditional primary care (n=36).

Results: The study primarily measured clinical improvements in hemoglobin A1C levels for a year. Results indicated significant improvements in the cognitive behavioral health group compared with the traditional care group at various intervals up to 51 weeks, with notable enhancements in hemoglobin A1C and secondary outcomes of patient satisfaction scores. During the 36 th and 51st weeks, the shared visit group demonstrated significantly lower hemoglobin A1c levels (36 wk: 9.22±0.2 vs. 10.02±0.2, P <0.001; 51 wk: 9.22±0.1 vs. 10.91±0.2, P <0.001), indicating improved long-term glycemic control.

Conclusions: Combining cognitive behavioral health with primary care visits significantly outperformed traditional care in improving clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction among adults with uncontrolled diabetes. The percentage of participants with clinically meaningful improvement in 36 weeks was 22.2% in the CBT versus 0.0% in the traditional primary care visit group. The positive outcomes suggest that integrated cognitive behavioral therapy can effectively contribute to diabetes management strategies, highlighting the importance of innovative approaches in addressing the diabetes epidemic.

认知行为疗法对慢性未控制糖尿病的影响:一项共享初级保健环境中的随机临床试验。
背景:在全球糖尿病患病率不断上升的背景下,本研究探讨了在初级保健就诊中整合认知行为疗法(CBT)对控制不受控制的糖尿病的疗效。设计:在俄勒冈州一家综合医疗诊所进行的随机临床试验涉及72名年龄在20-89岁之间的未控制的糖尿病患者。参与者被招募并随机分为两组:一组接受认知行为健康(n=36),另一组接受传统的初级保健(n=36)。结果:该研究主要测量了一年内血红蛋白A1C水平的临床改善情况。结果表明,认知行为健康组与传统护理组相比,在长达51周的不同时间间隔内均有显著改善,血红蛋白A1C和患者满意度评分的次要结局均有显著提高。在第36周和第51周,共同就诊组的血红蛋白A1c水平显著降低(36周:9.22±0.2 vs. 10.02±0.2)。结论:在改善未控制的成人糖尿病患者的临床结果和患者满意度方面,将认知行为健康与初级保健就诊相结合明显优于传统护理。在36周内,CBT组有临床意义改善的比例为22.2%,而传统初级保健就诊组为0.0%。这些积极的结果表明,综合认知行为疗法可以有效地促进糖尿病管理策略,突出了创新方法在解决糖尿病流行方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Care
Medical Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
228
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Rated as one of the top ten journals in healthcare administration, Medical Care is devoted to all aspects of the administration and delivery of healthcare. This scholarly journal publishes original, peer-reviewed papers documenting the most current developments in the rapidly changing field of healthcare. This timely journal reports on the findings of original investigations into issues related to the research, planning, organization, financing, provision, and evaluation of health services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信