A Novel Ultrafiltration Rate Feedback Controller for Use in Hemodialysis First Clinical Experience: First Clinical Experience: An Interventional Pilot Study.

IF 3.2 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Kidney360 Pub Date : 2025-06-04 DOI:10.34067/KID.0000000839
Stephan Thijssen, Lemuel Rivera Fuentes, Leticia Mirell Tapia Silva, Xiaoling Ye, Sabrina Casper, Doris H Fuertinger, Stefan Fuertinger, Peter Kotanko
{"title":"A Novel Ultrafiltration Rate Feedback Controller for Use in Hemodialysis First Clinical Experience: First Clinical Experience: An Interventional Pilot Study.","authors":"Stephan Thijssen, Lemuel Rivera Fuentes, Leticia Mirell Tapia Silva, Xiaoling Ye, Sabrina Casper, Doris H Fuertinger, Stefan Fuertinger, Peter Kotanko","doi":"10.34067/KID.0000000839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Relative blood volume (RBV) monitors are increasingly being used during hemodialysis. Manual ultrafiltration rate (UFR) adjustments to establish a favorable RBV trajectory are not feasible in routine practice. The goal of this study was to characterize the behavior of a new UFR feedback controller in vivo.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this pilot trial, chronic hemodialysis patients were prospectively studied during up to six successful study dialysis treatments each. During each study visit, the feedback controller generated UFR recommendations designed to guide the subject's RBV curve towards a pre-defined target trajectory. Each recommendation was evaluated by licensed healthcare staff and then either implemented or disregarded. Results were compared to standard-of-care treatments in the same subjects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen subjects (age 59 ± 15 years, 8 males) were studied during a total of 63 treatments. The controller functioned as intended and issued a total of 1 037 recommendations. Compared to standard-of-care treatments, its use was associated with a higher probability of RBV target range attainment (69% vs. 47%) and lower nadir systolic (106 vs. 111 mmHg) and diastolic (55 vs. 59 mmHg) blood pressure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The UFR feedback controller operated as intended, and its use led to a substantial increase in the rate of RBV target range attainment. This technology holds promise for improving fluid management in chronic hemodialysis patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":17882,"journal":{"name":"Kidney360","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney360","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34067/KID.0000000839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Relative blood volume (RBV) monitors are increasingly being used during hemodialysis. Manual ultrafiltration rate (UFR) adjustments to establish a favorable RBV trajectory are not feasible in routine practice. The goal of this study was to characterize the behavior of a new UFR feedback controller in vivo.

Methods: In this pilot trial, chronic hemodialysis patients were prospectively studied during up to six successful study dialysis treatments each. During each study visit, the feedback controller generated UFR recommendations designed to guide the subject's RBV curve towards a pre-defined target trajectory. Each recommendation was evaluated by licensed healthcare staff and then either implemented or disregarded. Results were compared to standard-of-care treatments in the same subjects.

Results: Fifteen subjects (age 59 ± 15 years, 8 males) were studied during a total of 63 treatments. The controller functioned as intended and issued a total of 1 037 recommendations. Compared to standard-of-care treatments, its use was associated with a higher probability of RBV target range attainment (69% vs. 47%) and lower nadir systolic (106 vs. 111 mmHg) and diastolic (55 vs. 59 mmHg) blood pressure.

Conclusions: The UFR feedback controller operated as intended, and its use led to a substantial increase in the rate of RBV target range attainment. This technology holds promise for improving fluid management in chronic hemodialysis patients.

一种用于血液透析的新型超滤速率反馈控制器首次临床经验:首次临床经验:一项介入性先导研究。
背景:相对血容量(RBV)监测仪越来越多地用于血液透析。手动调整超滤速率(UFR)以建立良好的RBV轨迹在常规实践中是不可行的。本研究的目的是表征一种新的UFR反馈控制器在体内的行为。方法:在这项试点试验中,慢性血液透析患者在多达六次成功的研究透析治疗中进行前瞻性研究。在每次研究访问期间,反馈控制器生成UFR建议,旨在引导受试者的RBV曲线走向预定的目标轨迹。每项建议都由持牌医护人员评估,然后实施或忽略。将结果与同一受试者的标准护理治疗进行比较。结果:研究对象15例(年龄59±15岁,男性8例),共63例治疗。控制器按预期运作,共发出1037项建议。与标准治疗相比,其使用与RBV目标范围达到的可能性更高(69%对47%)和较低的收缩压(106对111 mmHg)和舒张压(55对59 mmHg)相关。结论:UFR反馈控制器按预期运行,其使用导致RBV目标范围达到率大幅增加。这项技术有望改善慢性血液透析患者的液体管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Kidney360
Kidney360 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信