Impact of Iterative Development and Beta-Testing on the Usability and Acceptability of a Novel Just-in-Time Adaptive Digital Physical Activity Intervention.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Corneel Vandelanotte, Carol Maher, Danya Hodgetts, Tasadduq Imam, Mamunur Rashid, Quyen G To, Stewart Trost
{"title":"Impact of Iterative Development and Beta-Testing on the Usability and Acceptability of a Novel Just-in-Time Adaptive Digital Physical Activity Intervention.","authors":"Corneel Vandelanotte, Carol Maher, Danya Hodgetts, Tasadduq Imam, Mamunur Rashid, Quyen G To, Stewart Trost","doi":"10.1123/jpah.2025-0107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The search for cost-effective population-based physical activity interventions continues. Therefore, we developed a novel just-in-time adaptive digital assistant supported by machine learning (ie, MoveMentor). Beta-testing is essential to evaluate both technical performance and user acceptance. The aim of this study was to assess app usability, acceptability, and technical performance through iterative rounds of beta-testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Insufficiently active people (age: 39.8 [10.2]; 86% female) participated in 2 rounds of beta-testing (round 1, n = 112; round 2, n = 41). Participants downloaded the digital assistant app onto their phone to use during the study period (round 1: 12 wk, round 2: 4 wk). Participants were asked complete at least 4 educational and 5 chat conversations, rate over 50 notifications, and complete an online follow-up survey at week 4 examining aspects of app usability and acceptability. Descriptive statistics and t tests were used to analyze outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across both rounds, the app demonstrated good overall usability scores (System Usability Scale: 75.3 out of 100) but lower usefulness ratings. Round 2 participants showed increased engagement with features including action plans (P < .001), educational conversations (P < .001), and personalization features (P < .001), and they appreciated the educational conversations more (P < .05). Technical issues including data syncing problems and chat limitations persisted across both rounds. The notification system received mixed feedback, though customization options in round 2 reduced complaints (12.2%-7.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The app demonstrated good acceptability and usability but low usefulness. The iterative beta-testing successfully identified areas for improvement and enabled meaningful enhancements to content and user engagement features. While some technical challenges persisted, the beta-testing provided clear direction for ongoing improvements.</p>","PeriodicalId":16812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of physical activity & health","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of physical activity & health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2025-0107","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The search for cost-effective population-based physical activity interventions continues. Therefore, we developed a novel just-in-time adaptive digital assistant supported by machine learning (ie, MoveMentor). Beta-testing is essential to evaluate both technical performance and user acceptance. The aim of this study was to assess app usability, acceptability, and technical performance through iterative rounds of beta-testing.

Methods: Insufficiently active people (age: 39.8 [10.2]; 86% female) participated in 2 rounds of beta-testing (round 1, n = 112; round 2, n = 41). Participants downloaded the digital assistant app onto their phone to use during the study period (round 1: 12 wk, round 2: 4 wk). Participants were asked complete at least 4 educational and 5 chat conversations, rate over 50 notifications, and complete an online follow-up survey at week 4 examining aspects of app usability and acceptability. Descriptive statistics and t tests were used to analyze outcomes.

Results: Across both rounds, the app demonstrated good overall usability scores (System Usability Scale: 75.3 out of 100) but lower usefulness ratings. Round 2 participants showed increased engagement with features including action plans (P < .001), educational conversations (P < .001), and personalization features (P < .001), and they appreciated the educational conversations more (P < .05). Technical issues including data syncing problems and chat limitations persisted across both rounds. The notification system received mixed feedback, though customization options in round 2 reduced complaints (12.2%-7.3%).

Conclusions: The app demonstrated good acceptability and usability but low usefulness. The iterative beta-testing successfully identified areas for improvement and enabled meaningful enhancements to content and user engagement features. While some technical challenges persisted, the beta-testing provided clear direction for ongoing improvements.

迭代开发和beta测试对一种新型即时适应性数字体育活动干预的可用性和可接受性的影响
背景:寻找具有成本效益的基于人群的身体活动干预措施仍在继续。因此,我们开发了一种由机器学习支持的新型即时自适应数字助理(即MoveMentor)。beta测试对于评估技术性能和用户接受度都是必不可少的。这项研究的目的是通过反复的beta测试来评估应用的可用性、可接受性和技术性能。方法:运动不足人群(年龄:39.8 [10.2];86%女性)参加了2轮beta测试(第1轮,n = 112;第2轮,n = 41)。参与者将数字助理应用程序下载到他们的手机上,在研究期间(第1:12周,第2:4周)使用。参与者被要求完成至少4次教育和5次聊天对话,对50多个通知进行评分,并在第4周完成一项在线跟踪调查,以检查应用的可用性和可接受性。采用描述性统计和t检验对结果进行分析。结果:在两轮测试中,该应用程序显示出良好的总体可用性得分(系统可用性量表:75.3 / 100),但实用性评分较低。第二轮的参与者对包括行动计划(P < .001)、教育对话(P < .001)和个性化功能(P < .001)在内的功能表现出更高的参与度,他们更欣赏教育对话(P < .05)。包括数据同步问题和聊天限制在内的技术问题在两轮比赛中都持续存在。通知系统收到的反馈褒贬不一,不过第二轮的定制选项减少了投诉(12.2%-7.3%)。结论:该应用具有良好的可接受性和可用性,但实用性较低。迭代的beta测试成功地确定了需要改进的领域,并对内容和用户参与特性进行了有意义的增强。虽然一些技术挑战仍然存在,但beta测试为持续改进提供了明确的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of physical activity & health
Journal of physical activity & health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: The Journal of Physical Activity and Health (JPAH) publishes original research and review papers examining the relationship between physical activity and health, studying physical activity as an exposure as well as an outcome. As an exposure, the journal publishes articles examining how physical activity influences all aspects of health. As an outcome, the journal invites papers that examine the behavioral, community, and environmental interventions that may affect physical activity on an individual and/or population basis. The JPAH is an interdisciplinary journal published for researchers in fields of chronic disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信