Real World Performance of an Individualized Antitachycardia Pacing Algorithm.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Troy Jackson, Raymond Yee, Robert Taepke, Alan Cheng, Ulrika Birgersdotter-Green, Yong-Mei Cha, Jagmeet Singh
{"title":"Real World Performance of an Individualized Antitachycardia Pacing Algorithm.","authors":"Troy Jackson, Raymond Yee, Robert Taepke, Alan Cheng, Ulrika Birgersdotter-Green, Yong-Mei Cha, Jagmeet Singh","doi":"10.1111/jce.16747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A novel individualized antitachycardia pacing (IATP) algorithm using the post-pacing interval for real-time control has been introduced. Performance information is limited to a small safety and feasibility study with additional single-center and case studies. A larger-scale analysis is needed to better understand algorithm performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Deidentified remote monitoring transmissions from devices with the IATP therapy applied were randomly selected. Rhythms were classified and effects of the novel algorithm were assessed. For monomorphic ventricular tachycardias (MVTs) proportions of successful therapy, shock-free episodes, and acceleration were calculated using generalized estimating equations to correct for multiple episodes and compute statistics of the algorithm's performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 2259 MVT episodes in 336 patients. IATP succeeded in 87.1% of MVT episodes with 89.9% of MVT episodes ultimately free of shock therapy. Based on multivariate analysis, significant factors in therapy success were programming of at least the recommended number of sequences (90% at least recommended vs 73%, p = 0.00088) and female sex (95% for females vs 86%, p = 0.002). A trend to higher success was found for MVT with a cycle length of 320 ms or greater (90% vs. 83%, p = 0.10). The IATP accelerated 3.6% of MVT episodes. None of the available factors was significantly associated with acceleration in the multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The IATP algorithm succeeded in a large proportion of MVT episodes and with low acceleration in patients randomly selected from remote monitoring transmissions. Using at least the recommended number of sequences had the strongest association with successful therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":15178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.16747","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A novel individualized antitachycardia pacing (IATP) algorithm using the post-pacing interval for real-time control has been introduced. Performance information is limited to a small safety and feasibility study with additional single-center and case studies. A larger-scale analysis is needed to better understand algorithm performance.

Methods: Deidentified remote monitoring transmissions from devices with the IATP therapy applied were randomly selected. Rhythms were classified and effects of the novel algorithm were assessed. For monomorphic ventricular tachycardias (MVTs) proportions of successful therapy, shock-free episodes, and acceleration were calculated using generalized estimating equations to correct for multiple episodes and compute statistics of the algorithm's performance.

Results: There were 2259 MVT episodes in 336 patients. IATP succeeded in 87.1% of MVT episodes with 89.9% of MVT episodes ultimately free of shock therapy. Based on multivariate analysis, significant factors in therapy success were programming of at least the recommended number of sequences (90% at least recommended vs 73%, p = 0.00088) and female sex (95% for females vs 86%, p = 0.002). A trend to higher success was found for MVT with a cycle length of 320 ms or greater (90% vs. 83%, p = 0.10). The IATP accelerated 3.6% of MVT episodes. None of the available factors was significantly associated with acceleration in the multivariate analysis.

Conclusions: The IATP algorithm succeeded in a large proportion of MVT episodes and with low acceleration in patients randomly selected from remote monitoring transmissions. Using at least the recommended number of sequences had the strongest association with successful therapy.

个体化抗心动过速起搏算法的实际性能。
背景:介绍了一种新的个体化抗心动过速起搏(IATP)算法,该算法利用起搏后间隔进行实时控制。性能信息仅限于一个小的安全性和可行性研究与额外的单中心和案例研究。为了更好地理解算法的性能,需要进行更大规模的分析。方法:随机选择应用IATP治疗的设备中已识别的远程监测传输。对节律进行了分类,并对新算法的效果进行了评估。对于单纯性室性心动过速(mvt),使用广义估计方程计算成功治疗、无休克发作和加速的比例,以校正多次发作并计算算法性能的统计数据。结果:336例患者发生MVT 2259次。IATP治疗87.1%的MVT发作成功,89.9%的MVT发作最终不需要休克治疗。基于多变量分析,治疗成功的重要因素是至少推荐的序列数(90%至少推荐vs 73%, p = 0.00088)和女性性别(95%女性vs 86%, p = 0.002)。周期长度为320 ms或更长的MVT有更高成功率的趋势(90%对83%,p = 0.10)。IATP加速了3.6%的MVT发作。在多变量分析中,没有一个可用的因素与加速度显著相关。结论:从远程监测传输中随机选择的患者,IATP算法在MVT发作中成功率高,加速度低。至少使用推荐数量的序列与成功的治疗有最强的关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
14.80%
发文量
433
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (JCE) keeps its readership well informed of the latest developments in the study and management of arrhythmic disorders. Edited by Bradley P. Knight, M.D., and a distinguished international editorial board, JCE is the leading journal devoted to the study of the electrophysiology of the heart.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信