Risks associated with early postoperative urinary catheter removal during epidural analgesia: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.9 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-14 DOI:10.4103/ija.ija_101_25
Kazuma Rifu, Jun Watanabe, Homare Ito, Hironori Yamaguchi, Naohiro Sata
{"title":"Risks associated with early postoperative urinary catheter removal during epidural analgesia: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Kazuma Rifu, Jun Watanabe, Homare Ito, Hironori Yamaguchi, Naohiro Sata","doi":"10.4103/ija.ija_101_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The efficacy and safety of early urinary catheter removal during epidural analgesia after surgery remain unclear. The primary objective of this review was whether early removal of urinary catheters within 48 hours after surgery, regardless of ongoing epidural analgesia, affects the incidence of postoperative urinary retention (POUR) in patients undergoing surgery under epidural analgesia, compared to late removal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL in November 2024 to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the impact of early catheter removal. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed, and the certainty of the evidence (CoE) was evaluated using the GRADE approach. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024612683).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of six RCTs involving 707 patients were included. Early urinary catheter removal was associated with an increased risk of postoperative urinary retention compared to late removal (risk difference [RD]: 0.09; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01, 0.17; low CoE). However, no significant differences were observed in the incidence of urinary tract infections (RD: -0.03; 95% CI: -0.09, 0.03; very low CoE) or the length of hospital stay (mean difference: -1.0 day; 95% CI: -3.0, 1.0; very low CoE) between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early removal of urinary catheters during epidural analgesia may increase the POUR without significantly impacting the incidence of urinary tract infections or the length of hospital stay. These findings underscore the importance of carefully weighing the risks and benefits when considering early catheter removal in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":13339,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"69 6","pages":"540-546"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12133045/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_101_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: The efficacy and safety of early urinary catheter removal during epidural analgesia after surgery remain unclear. The primary objective of this review was whether early removal of urinary catheters within 48 hours after surgery, regardless of ongoing epidural analgesia, affects the incidence of postoperative urinary retention (POUR) in patients undergoing surgery under epidural analgesia, compared to late removal.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL in November 2024 to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the impact of early catheter removal. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed, and the certainty of the evidence (CoE) was evaluated using the GRADE approach. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024612683).

Results: A total of six RCTs involving 707 patients were included. Early urinary catheter removal was associated with an increased risk of postoperative urinary retention compared to late removal (risk difference [RD]: 0.09; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01, 0.17; low CoE). However, no significant differences were observed in the incidence of urinary tract infections (RD: -0.03; 95% CI: -0.09, 0.03; very low CoE) or the length of hospital stay (mean difference: -1.0 day; 95% CI: -3.0, 1.0; very low CoE) between the groups.

Conclusion: Early removal of urinary catheters during epidural analgesia may increase the POUR without significantly impacting the incidence of urinary tract infections or the length of hospital stay. These findings underscore the importance of carefully weighing the risks and benefits when considering early catheter removal in clinical practice.

硬膜外镇痛中早期术后尿导管拔除的相关风险:一项最新的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景与目的:术后硬膜外镇痛中早期拔除尿管的有效性和安全性尚不清楚。本综述的主要目的是:术后48小时内早期拔除导尿管,无论是否持续硬膜外镇痛,与晚期拔除相比,是否会影响硬膜外镇痛下手术患者术后尿潴留(POUR)的发生率。方法:我们于2024年11月对MEDLINE、Embase和CENTRAL进行了系统检索,以确定评估早期拔管影响的随机对照试验(rct)。进行随机效应荟萃分析,使用GRADE方法评估证据的确定性(CoE)。该研究方案已在PROSPERO注册(CRD42024612683)。结果:共纳入6项rct,共707例患者。与晚期拔除相比,早期拔除尿管与术后尿潴留的风险增加相关(风险差[RD]: 0.09;95%置信区间[CI]: 0.01, 0.17;低CoE)。然而,两组尿路感染发生率无显著差异(RD: -0.03;95% ci: -0.09, 0.03;非常低的CoE)或住院时间(平均差异:-1.0天;95% ci: -3.0, 1.0;非常低的CoE)。结论:硬膜外镇痛时早期拔除导尿管可增加尿路感染发生率,但对尿路感染发生率及住院时间无明显影响。这些发现强调了在临床实践中考虑早期拔管时仔细权衡风险和收益的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
44.80%
发文量
210
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信